Yanbian Longding: Estadísticas de Córners en 2026
Información del equipo
Temporada
País
2026
China
Competición
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
16 | 94% | 81% | 69% | 63% | 56% | 38% | 25% | 12.01 |
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
15 | 100% | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 11.73 |
| 3 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
16 | 88% | 69% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 19% | 10.69 |
| 4 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
16 | 75% | 69% | 56% | 50% | 50% | 31% | 13% | 10.19 |
| 5 |
Dongguan United
|
16 | 75% | 63% | 56% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 19% | 10.13 |
| 6 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 9.86 |
| 7 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 9.8 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
16 | 75% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 6% | 9.63 |
| 9 |
Dalian Huayi
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 9.53 |
| 10 |
Shaanxi Union
|
15 | 73% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9.47 |
| 11 |
Nanjing City
|
16 | 50% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 8.88 |
| 12 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
16 | 69% | 50% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 8.88 |
| 13 |
Yanbian Longding
|
16 | 63% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 8.63 |
| 14 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 8.53 |
| 15 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
16 | 56% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7.62 |
| 16 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
16 | 56% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 7.62 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 12.63 |
| 2 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 71% | 71% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 12.14 |
| 3 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
8 | 100% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 11.51 |
| 4 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 0% | 10.76 |
| 5 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 10.25 |
| 6 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 10 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Union
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 9.86 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 9.75 |
| 9 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 9.67 |
| 10 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
8 | 88% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 9.13 |
| 11 |
Dongguan United
|
9 | 67% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 8.89 |
| 12 |
Yanbian Longding
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.76 |
| 13 |
Dalian Huayi
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 8.51 |
| 14 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.01 |
| 15 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
9 | 56% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 7.45 |
| 16 |
Nanjing City
|
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 6.63 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 71% | 71% | 71% | 57% | 29% | 12 |
| 2 |
Dongguan United
|
7 | 86% | 86% | 86% | 71% | 71% | 43% | 29% | 11.71 |
| 3 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
8 | 100% | 75% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 11.38 |
| 4 |
Nanjing City
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 11.13 |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 10.72 |
| 6 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 10 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
8 | 88% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 9.76 |
| 8 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 9.63 |
| 9 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 9.63 |
| 10 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 33% | 33% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 9.55 |
| 11 |
Shaanxi Union
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 9.13 |
| 12 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 9 |
| 13 |
Yanbian Longding
|
8 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 14 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7.85 |
| 15 |
Changchun Yatai
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 7.15 |
| 16 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
8 | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.13 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
15 | 100% | 100% | 80% | 80% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 7.53 |
| 3 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 87% | 87% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 6.4 |
| 4 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
16 | 94% | 81% | 75% | 56% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 6.38 |
| 5 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
16 | 88% | 81% | 75% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 5.94 |
| 6 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
16 | 81% | 75% | 69% | 56% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 5.19 |
| 7 |
Dalian Huayi
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 8 |
Nanjing City
|
16 | 81% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 13% | 4.75 |
| 9 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
16 | 69% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 67% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
16 | 69% | 56% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 12 |
Shaanxi Union
|
15 | 87% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.2 |
| 13 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
16 | 75% | 56% | 50% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.06 |
| 14 |
Dongguan United
|
16 | 94% | 44% | 19% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 4 |
| 15 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
15 | 87% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 16 |
Yanbian Longding
|
16 | 69% | 50% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.19 |
| 17 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
16 | 44% | 38% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.06 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
7 | 100% | 100% | 71% | 71% | 71% | 43% | 29% | 7.29 |
| 3 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 7.13 |
| 4 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
8 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 7.13 |
| 5 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
8 | 100% | 100% | 88% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 6.88 |
| 6 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 86% | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 6.57 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Union
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 5.57 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 5.5 |
| 9 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 11 |
Dalian Huayi
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 4.63 |
| 12 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
6 | 100% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4.5 |
| 13 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 14 |
Dongguan United
|
9 | 100% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 4.33 |
| 15 |
Nanjing City
|
8 | 75% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.13 |
| 16 |
Yanbian Longding
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 17 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 3.78 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
7 | 100% | 100% | 86% | 86% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 8 |
| 3 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 5.63 |
| 4 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 5.63 |
| 5 |
Dalian Huayi
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 6 |
Nanjing City
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.38 |
| 7 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 8 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 9 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
9 | 67% | 67% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 4.11 |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.86 |
| 11 |
Dongguan United
|
7 | 86% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 12 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
9 | 78% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 13 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 14 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
8 | 63% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 15 |
Shaanxi Union
|
8 | 75% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 16 |
Yanbian Longding
|
8 | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| 17 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
7 | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.14 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Dongguan United
|
16 | 88% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 38% | 6.13 |
| 3 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
15 | 93% | 93% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 5.93 |
| 4 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
16 | 94% | 81% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 25% | 13% | 5.63 |
| 5 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
16 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 5.5 |
| 6 |
Yanbian Longding
|
16 | 81% | 63% | 63% | 63% | 31% | 13% | 13% | 5.44 |
| 7 |
Shaanxi Union
|
15 | 80% | 67% | 60% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.27 |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
16 | 81% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 9 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
16 | 81% | 75% | 63% | 31% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.63 |
| 10 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
16 | 75% | 63% | 56% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 0% | 4.56 |
| 11 |
Dalian Huayi
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 4.53 |
| 12 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
16 | 75% | 56% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 13 |
Changchun Yatai
|
15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.2 |
| 14 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
15 | 67% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.2 |
| 15 |
Nanjing City
|
16 | 63% | 56% | 19% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.13 |
| 16 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
16 | 69% | 50% | 19% | 19% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.56 |
| 17 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
15 | 80% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 5.57 |
| 3 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
8 | 100% | 88% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
6 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 5.17 |
| 5 |
Changchun Yatai
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5 |
| 6 |
Yanbian Longding
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 4.88 |
| 7 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
8 | 75% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 4.75 |
| 8 |
Dongguan United
|
9 | 78% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.56 |
| 9 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.38 |
| 10 |
Shaanxi Union
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 4.29 |
| 11 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 12 |
Dalian Huayi
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 3.88 |
| 14 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
9 | 56% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.63 |
| 16 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
7 | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
| 17 |
Nanjing City
|
8 | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Dongguan United
|
7 | 100% | 100% | 71% | 71% | 71% | 71% | 57% | 8.14 |
| 3 |
Wuxi Wugo
|
9 | 89% | 89% | 78% | 56% | 44% | 33% | 33% | 6.44 |
| 4 |
Shaanxi Union
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 6.13 |
| 5 |
Yanbian Longding
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 75% | 75% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 6 |
| 6 |
Heilongjiang Lava Spring
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 5.75 |
| 7 |
Nanjing City
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 5.75 |
| 8 |
Hebei Kungfu
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 5.71 |
| 9 |
Shanghai Jiading
|
8 | 100% | 100% | 88% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 5.63 |
| 10 |
Meizhou Hakka
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 5.5 |
| 11 |
Shenzhen Juniors
|
9 | 100% | 78% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 5.44 |
| 12 |
Dalian Huayi
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 5.29 |
| 13 |
Guangzhou E-Power
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 4.63 |
| 14 |
Nantong Zhiyun
|
8 | 100% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 15 |
Guangxi Hengchen
|
7 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 4 |
| 16 |
Changchun Yatai
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 17 |
Suzhou Dongwu
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
Estadísticas de Córners de Yanbian Longding
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de en el League One China:
Los partidos de registran un promedio total de 8.63 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 37.5% de los partidos de en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
promedia 3.19 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 6.25% de los encuentros, logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 5.44 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.