North Texas: Estadísticas de Córners en 2021
Información del equipo
Temporada
País
2021
Estados Unidos de América
Competición
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New England II
|
28 | 79% | 61% | 39% | 32% | 29% | 25% | 14% | 10.46 |
| 2 |
Inter Miami II
|
28 | 71% | 54% | 39% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 9.66 |
| 3 |
North Carolina FC
|
28 | 82% | 46% | 39% | 32% | 29% | 18% | 14% | 9.57 |
| 4 |
Toronto II
|
28 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 32% | 14% | 7% | 4% | 9.33 |
| 5 |
Richmond Kickers
|
29 | 72% | 62% | 41% | 31% | 21% | 17% | 10% | 9.25 |
| 6 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
30 | 70% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 9.14 |
| 7 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
28 | 75% | 50% | 32% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 9.04 |
| 8 |
Forward Madison
|
28 | 68% | 43% | 29% | 21% | 11% | 11% | 7% | 8.74 |
| 9 |
Greenville Triumph
|
30 | 60% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 10% | 8.72 |
| 10 |
North Texas
|
29 | 59% | 45% | 34% | 28% | 24% | 14% | 3% | 8.35 |
| 11 |
Union Omaha
|
30 | 50% | 43% | 37% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 10% | 8.17 |
| 12 |
FC Tucson
|
30 | 57% | 43% | 30% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 8.03 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New England II
|
14 | 86% | 64% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 10.31 |
| 2 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
14 | 79% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 10.15 |
| 3 |
Toronto II
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 10 |
| 4 |
Richmond Kickers
|
14 | 86% | 79% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 9.86 |
| 5 |
North Carolina FC
|
14 | 86% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 9.28 |
| 6 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
15 | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 9.2 |
| 7 |
Inter Miami II
|
14 | 57% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 9.07 |
| 8 |
Greenville Triumph
|
15 | 67% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 8.38 |
| 9 |
Forward Madison
|
14 | 57% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 8.15 |
| 10 |
FC Tucson
|
15 | 60% | 53% | 33% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 8.14 |
| 11 |
North Texas
|
14 | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 8.07 |
| 12 |
Union Omaha
|
16 | 38% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 7.81 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
New England II
|
14 | 71% | 57% | 36% | 29% | 29% | 21% | 21% | 10.64 |
| 2 |
Inter Miami II
|
14 | 86% | 71% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 10.22 |
| 3 |
North Carolina FC
|
14 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 9.85 |
| 4 |
Forward Madison
|
14 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 9.29 |
| 5 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
15 | 73% | 47% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 9.08 |
| 6 |
Greenville Triumph
|
15 | 53% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 9 |
| 7 |
Toronto II
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 8.72 |
| 8 |
Richmond Kickers
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 8.64 |
| 9 |
North Texas
|
15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 8.6 |
| 10 |
Union Omaha
|
14 | 64% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 8.57 |
| 11 |
FC Tucson
|
15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.93 |
| 12 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
14 | 71% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.92 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
30 | 83% | 63% | 53% | 37% | 33% | 27% | 17% | 5.75 |
| 3 |
New England II
|
28 | 79% | 68% | 61% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 7% | 5.38 |
| 4 |
Greenville Triumph
|
30 | 83% | 70% | 57% | 37% | 30% | 13% | 7% | 5.29 |
| 5 |
Union Omaha
|
30 | 80% | 63% | 43% | 37% | 27% | 17% | 10% | 4.7 |
| 6 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
28 | 71% | 61% | 46% | 36% | 18% | 7% | 4% | 4.62 |
| 7 |
North Texas
|
29 | 83% | 69% | 45% | 24% | 17% | 14% | 7% | 4.52 |
| 8 |
Richmond Kickers
|
29 | 76% | 62% | 45% | 24% | 17% | 10% | 7% | 4.46 |
| 9 |
Toronto II
|
28 | 71% | 64% | 50% | 29% | 18% | 14% | 7% | 4.44 |
| 10 |
Inter Miami II
|
28 | 71% | 54% | 43% | 18% | 11% | 11% | 7% | 4.22 |
| 11 |
Forward Madison
|
28 | 79% | 50% | 39% | 21% | 11% | 4% | 0% | 4.07 |
| 12 |
FC Tucson
|
30 | 60% | 43% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 3.57 |
| 13 |
North Carolina FC
|
28 | 54% | 39% | 32% | 14% | 7% | 4% | 0% | 3.14 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
15 | 93% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 6.4 |
| 3 |
Greenville Triumph
|
15 | 87% | 80% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 5.69 |
| 4 |
New England II
|
14 | 86% | 79% | 71% | 43% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 5.62 |
| 5 |
Toronto II
|
14 | 86% | 79% | 64% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 5.54 |
| 6 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
14 | 86% | 79% | 64% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 5.46 |
| 7 |
Richmond Kickers
|
14 | 93% | 79% | 57% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 4.86 |
| 8 |
Union Omaha
|
16 | 81% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 4.81 |
| 9 |
North Texas
|
14 | 93% | 79% | 57% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.57 |
| 10 |
Inter Miami II
|
14 | 71% | 50% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.15 |
| 11 |
FC Tucson
|
15 | 87% | 67% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 12 |
Forward Madison
|
14 | 64% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 3.77 |
| 13 |
North Carolina FC
|
14 | 64% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.64 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
New England II
|
14 | 71% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 5.09 |
| 3 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
15 | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 5 |
| 4 |
Greenville Triumph
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 5 |
Union Omaha
|
14 | 79% | 64% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 4.57 |
| 6 |
North Texas
|
15 | 73% | 60% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 4.47 |
| 7 |
Forward Madison
|
14 | 93% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 8 |
Inter Miami II
|
14 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 21% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 4.29 |
| 9 |
Richmond Kickers
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
| 10 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
14 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.77 |
| 11 |
Toronto II
|
14 | 57% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 12 |
FC Tucson
|
15 | 33% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 3 |
| 13 |
North Carolina FC
|
14 | 43% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.64 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
North Carolina FC
|
28 | 93% | 86% | 82% | 54% | 46% | 32% | 14% | 6.43 |
| 3 |
Inter Miami II
|
28 | 86% | 71% | 64% | 46% | 32% | 21% | 4% | 5.44 |
| 4 |
New England II
|
28 | 71% | 64% | 46% | 29% | 25% | 11% | 7% | 5.08 |
| 5 |
Toronto II
|
28 | 79% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 25% | 14% | 4.89 |
| 6 |
Richmond Kickers
|
29 | 79% | 59% | 52% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 7% | 4.79 |
| 7 |
Forward Madison
|
28 | 79% | 64% | 39% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 4.67 |
| 8 |
FC Tucson
|
30 | 80% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 4.46 |
| 9 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
28 | 64% | 61% | 54% | 25% | 11% | 4% | 4% | 4.42 |
| 10 |
North Texas
|
29 | 79% | 52% | 28% | 17% | 10% | 7% | 3% | 3.83 |
| 11 |
Union Omaha
|
30 | 63% | 43% | 30% | 10% | 7% | 3% | 3% | 3.47 |
| 12 |
Greenville Triumph
|
30 | 57% | 40% | 23% | 17% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3.43 |
| 13 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
30 | 63% | 43% | 30% | 10% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.39 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
North Carolina FC
|
14 | 86% | 71% | 71% | 50% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 5.64 |
| 3 |
Richmond Kickers
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 57% | 50% | 36% | 14% | 14% | 5 |
| 4 |
Inter Miami II
|
14 | 71% | 50% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 4.92 |
| 5 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
14 | 64% | 57% | 50% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 4.69 |
| 6 |
New England II
|
14 | 86% | 71% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 4.69 |
| 7 |
Toronto II
|
14 | 64% | 64% | 43% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 7% | 4.46 |
| 8 |
Forward Madison
|
14 | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 4.38 |
| 9 |
FC Tucson
|
15 | 73% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
North Texas
|
14 | 64% | 43% | 29% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 11 |
Union Omaha
|
16 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 12 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
15 | 60% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 |
| 13 |
Greenville Triumph
|
15 | 33% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
North Carolina FC
|
14 | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 7.21 |
| 3 |
Inter Miami II
|
14 | 100% | 93% | 86% | 57% | 36% | 21% | 0% | 5.93 |
| 4 |
New England II
|
14 | 57% | 57% | 57% | 36% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 5.55 |
| 5 |
Toronto II
|
14 | 93% | 64% | 57% | 36% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 5.29 |
| 6 |
FC Tucson
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.93 |
| 7 |
Forward Madison
|
14 | 93% | 79% | 43% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 4.93 |
| 8 |
Richmond Kickers
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.57 |
| 9 |
South Georgia Tormenta FC
|
14 | 64% | 64% | 57% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4.15 |
| 10 |
North Texas
|
15 | 93% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.13 |
| 11 |
Chattanooga Red Wolves
|
15 | 67% | 60% | 47% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 12 |
Greenville Triumph
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
| 13 |
Union Omaha
|
14 | 79% | 50% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 4 |
Estadísticas de Córners de North Texas
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de North Texas en el USL1:
Los partidos de North Texas registran un promedio total de 8.35 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 34.48% de los partidos de North Texas en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
North Texas promedia 4.52 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 24.14% de los encuentros, North Texas logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 3.83 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de North Texas como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.