Hà Nội II: Estadísticas de Córners en 2025/26
Información del equipo
Temporada
País
2025/26
Vietnam
Competición
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ha Noi
|
25 | 72% | 60% | 52% | 40% | 28% | 20% | 20% | 9.72 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
25 | 76% | 60% | 48% | 40% | 32% | 16% | 12% | 9.68 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
25 | 68% | 60% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 16% | 12% | 9.2 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong
|
25 | 68% | 56% | 40% | 28% | 24% | 16% | 12% | 9.08 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
25 | 68% | 60% | 48% | 24% | 16% | 12% | 8% | 8.96 |
| 6 |
Nam Dinh
|
25 | 56% | 40% | 36% | 28% | 16% | 12% | 4% | 8.84 |
| 7 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
25 | 60% | 48% | 44% | 28% | 24% | 16% | 4% | 8.68 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
25 | 76% | 44% | 32% | 20% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 8.32 |
| 9 |
Viettel
|
25 | 60% | 28% | 24% | 20% | 20% | 12% | 8% | 8.28 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
25 | 60% | 32% | 24% | 24% | 12% | 8% | 4% | 8.12 |
| 11 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
25 | 48% | 28% | 20% | 20% | 12% | 12% | 8% | 8 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
25 | 44% | 28% | 20% | 16% | 12% | 12% | 8% | 7.88 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
25 | 60% | 44% | 32% | 24% | 16% | 8% | 0% | 7.76 |
| 15 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
25 | 48% | 28% | 20% | 12% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 7.24 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Phu Dong
|
12 | 83% | 67% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 9.92 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
12 | 67% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 9.58 |
| 3 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 9.46 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 9.39 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
12 | 67% | 67% | 58% | 33% | 25% | 25% | 17% | 9.33 |
| 6 |
Ha Noi
|
12 | 58% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8.83 |
| 7 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 54% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 8.62 |
| 8 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8.54 |
| 9 |
Viettel
|
12 | 58% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8.34 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 8.31 |
| 11 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
12 | 58% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 7.75 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
12 | 58% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 7.33 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 46% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.31 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 38% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.16 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 10.54 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 9.77 |
| 3 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 92% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 9.23 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
12 | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 9.08 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
12 | 58% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 9 |
| 6 |
Hà Nội II
|
12 | 50% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8.66 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 8.61 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 8.31 |
| 9 |
Viettel
|
13 | 62% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8.23 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
12 | 58% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 7.91 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
12 | 42% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 7.83 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 7.77 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
12 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 7.42 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
12 | 50% | 25% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 7.17 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
25 | 92% | 88% | 60% | 48% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 6.16 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
25 | 88% | 68% | 48% | 40% | 32% | 20% | 8% | 5.2 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
25 | 84% | 72% | 60% | 52% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 5.12 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
25 | 88% | 64% | 52% | 40% | 24% | 16% | 12% | 5.04 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
25 | 80% | 64% | 52% | 36% | 32% | 20% | 12% | 4.88 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
25 | 68% | 56% | 40% | 32% | 20% | 16% | 12% | 4.4 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
25 | 84% | 64% | 40% | 28% | 20% | 4% | 4% | 4.32 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
25 | 76% | 64% | 40% | 24% | 16% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
25 | 68% | 48% | 36% | 16% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 3.8 |
| 11 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
25 | 72% | 52% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 3.68 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
25 | 64% | 44% | 20% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 3.56 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
25 | 52% | 48% | 36% | 28% | 16% | 4% | 0% | 3.48 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
25 | 64% | 40% | 20% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 3.08 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
25 | 52% | 36% | 20% | 12% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 2.96 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
12 | 92% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 5.33 |
| 3 |
Phu Dong
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 58% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 5.25 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 100% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 5 |
| 5 |
Viettel
|
12 | 83% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 4.92 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
12 | 92% | 58% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 4.75 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 4.62 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 4.54 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
12 | 75% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 4.5 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 69% | 69% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4 |
| 12 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 13 |
Da Nang
|
12 | 75% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
12 | 67% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.23 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 92% | 92% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 54% | 15% | 6.92 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 5.62 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 54% | 54% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 5.31 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 5.08 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 4.54 |
| 7 |
Hà Nội II
|
12 | 83% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 8 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
12 | 67% | 67% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.17 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
12 | 83% | 50% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.08 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 38% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 11 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 31% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.15 |
| 12 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
12 | 42% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.08 |
| 13 |
PVF-CAND
|
12 | 58% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.08 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
12 | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 2.67 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 54% | 38% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.54 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
25 | 88% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 36% | 24% | 12% | 5.72 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
25 | 88% | 72% | 56% | 48% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 5.16 |
| 5 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
25 | 88% | 64% | 48% | 32% | 24% | 16% | 12% | 5.04 |
| 6 |
Da Nang
|
25 | 72% | 64% | 48% | 40% | 40% | 16% | 8% | 4.68 |
| 7 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
25 | 88% | 68% | 52% | 28% | 16% | 8% | 4% | 4.64 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
25 | 80% | 68% | 48% | 40% | 16% | 8% | 4% | 4.56 |
| 9 |
Hai Phong
|
25 | 72% | 60% | 32% | 28% | 20% | 16% | 12% | 4.48 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
25 | 80% | 56% | 44% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 4% | 4.36 |
| 11 |
Phu Dong
|
25 | 68% | 60% | 36% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 8% | 4.2 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
25 | 76% | 44% | 32% | 20% | 16% | 4% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
25 | 72% | 56% | 28% | 20% | 12% | 8% | 0% | 3.68 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
25 | 56% | 44% | 28% | 16% | 12% | 8% | 4% | 3.56 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
25 | 52% | 40% | 28% | 16% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 3.16 |
| 16 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
25 | 52% | 32% | 20% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.84 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 5.54 |
| 4 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 5.31 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 92% | 69% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 4.92 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
12 | 75% | 67% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 4.83 |
| 7 |
Hai Phong
|
12 | 67% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 4.83 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
12 | 83% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.67 |
| 9 |
PVF-CAND
|
13 | 62% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 4.31 |
| 10 |
Da Nang
|
12 | 67% | 50% | 42% | 42% | 42% | 8% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 11 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
12 | 83% | 58% | 42% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
12 | 58% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 14 |
Viettel
|
12 | 67% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.42 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.08 |
| 16 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 38% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
12 | 83% | 75% | 58% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 5.92 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 100% | 77% | 69% | 62% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 5.46 |
| 4 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 92% | 77% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 5.38 |
| 5 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 77% | 77% | 54% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 5.23 |
| 6 |
PVF-CAND
|
12 | 100% | 75% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.83 |
| 7 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
12 | 92% | 58% | 42% | 42% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 4.75 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
12 | 83% | 67% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 9 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.15 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh
|
12 | 92% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Phu Dong
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 3.77 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
12 | 67% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 54% | 38% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 3.62 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
12 | 67% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
13 | 38% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Estadísticas de Córners de Hà Nội II
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de Hà Nội II en el V.League 1:
Los partidos de Hà Nội II registran un promedio total de 7.88 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 20% de los partidos de Hà Nội II en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
Hà Nội II promedia 4.2 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 24% de los encuentros, Hà Nội II logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 3.68 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de Hà Nội II como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.