Temporada
País
2025/26
Vietnam
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 10.55 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9.18 |
| 4 |
Ha Noi
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 8.91 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 8.9 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 8.64 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 8.09 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
11 | 64% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.81 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 7.8 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
11 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.45 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
10 | 70% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.4 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.18 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.7 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10.2 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 10.17 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 10.16 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 9.67 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9 |
| 6 |
PVF-CAND
|
6 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 7 |
Viettel
|
4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.83 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 7.67 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
4 | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.25 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
6 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.16 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.8 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
5 | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.4 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 11 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10.5 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 10.17 |
| 4 |
Phu Dong
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 9.67 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.83 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 7 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 8 |
| 8 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.84 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.6 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
5 | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 13 |
Viettel
|
6 | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.84 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.34 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
11 | 91% | 91% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 9% | 6.09 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
11 | 100% | 73% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 5.64 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.5 |
| 5 |
Viettel
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.8 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 8 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.1 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4 |
| 11 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
11 | 45% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
11 | 73% | 36% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.36 |
| 13 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.27 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 50% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 3.1 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
11 | 64% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.82 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 7 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 6 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 |
PVF-CAND
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4.83 |
| 8 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 9 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.2 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 4 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
6 | 83% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 15 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
4 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 6.25 |
| 3 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 83% | 83% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 5.33 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 100% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 5.2 |
| 5 |
Viettel
|
6 | 100% | 83% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
6 | 83% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 100% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 5.82 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 5.73 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.91 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.55 |
| 7 |
Nam Dinh
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 55% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
11 | 73% | 64% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
11 | 73% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.09 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.18 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.91 |
| 16 |
Viettel
|
10 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
6 | 100% | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 5.83 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 4 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 10 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.6 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 83% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 8.17 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.8 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.2 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 5 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.6 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
4 | 100% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 10 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 100% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de Hà Nội II en el V.League 1:
Los partidos de Hà Nội II registran un promedio total de 7.18 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 9.09% de los partidos de Hà Nội II en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
Hà Nội II promedia 4 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 18.18% de los encuentros, Hà Nội II logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 3.18 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de Hà Nội II como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.
Cambiar para
¿Quieres cambiar a ?
Entra o registrate para añadir a los favoritos
Puedes entrar con redes sociales
¿Aún no estás registrado? Crea Una Cuenta.