Estadísticas de FLC Thanh Hoa

Team Info

Temporada

2023/24

País

Vietnam

Lugar

Sân vận động Thanh Hóa

Competición

Vietnam

V.League 1

Resumen Calendario Resultados Equipo Mejores Jugadores Clasificación

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería en Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Binh Dinh	19	74%	63%	63%	47%	42%	42%	21%	10.16
2	Binh Duong	19	68%	68%	58%	53%	42%	26%	16%	9.95
3	Công An Nhân Dân	19	68%	58%	53%	37%	37%	21%	16%	9.84
4	Viettel	19	63%	53%	42%	32%	32%	26%	21%	9.47
5	Hà Nội II	19	74%	68%	53%	26%	26%	21%	11%	9.42
6	Ho Chi Minh City	19	68%	58%	47%	32%	16%	16%	11%	9.27
7	Song Lam Nghe An	19	68%	58%	42%	26%	21%	21%	11%	9.16
8	Hai Phong	19	74%	58%	53%	37%	21%	11%	5%	9.15
9	Quang Nam	19	68%	47%	37%	26%	26%	11%	5%	8.64
10	Ha Noi	19	74%	53%	26%	11%	11%	11%	11%	8.57
11	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	19	68%	47%	37%	21%	21%	5%	5%	8.31
12	Nam Dinh	19	58%	37%	26%	11%	11%	11%	11%	8.05
13	Sanna Khanh Hoa	19	63%	42%	37%	26%	21%	16%	11%	8.05
14	FLC Thanh Hoa	19	58%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5%	5%	7.84

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Binh Dinh	9	44%	33%	33%	11%	11%	11%	0%	7.33
2	Binh Duong	10	70%	70%	60%	50%	40%	30%	10%	9.4
3	Công An Nhân Dân	10	70%	50%	40%	20%	20%	10%	0%	8.7
4	Viettel	10	90%	70%	60%	40%	40%	30%	30%	11
5	Hà Nội II	10	80%	80%	70%	40%	40%	30%	20%	10.4
6	Ho Chi Minh City	9	56%	56%	44%	33%	22%	22%	22%	9.44
7	Song Lam Nghe An	10	60%	60%	40%	30%	20%	20%	10%	8.8
8	Hai Phong	10	70%	50%	40%	40%	20%	10%	0%	8.6
9	Quang Nam	9	56%	22%	22%	11%	11%	11%	0%	7.45
10	Ha Noi	9	78%	44%	33%	22%	22%	22%	22%	9.44
11	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	9	78%	67%	56%	22%	22%	0%	0%	9.11
12	Nam Dinh	9	44%	33%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	8
13	Sanna Khanh Hoa	9	67%	33%	33%	33%	33%	22%	22%	8.44
14	FLC Thanh Hoa	10	80%	70%	50%	30%	20%	10%	10%	9.4

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Binh Dinh	10	100%	90%	90%	80%	70%	70%	40%	12.7
2	Binh Duong	9	67%	67%	56%	56%	44%	22%	22%	10.56
3	Công An Nhân Dân	9	67%	67%	67%	56%	56%	33%	33%	11.11
4	Viettel	9	33%	33%	22%	22%	22%	22%	11%	7.78
5	Hà Nội II	9	67%	56%	33%	11%	11%	11%	0%	8.33
6	Ho Chi Minh City	10	80%	60%	50%	30%	10%	10%	0%	9.1
7	Song Lam Nghe An	9	78%	56%	44%	22%	22%	22%	11%	9.55
8	Hai Phong	9	78%	67%	67%	33%	22%	11%	11%	9.77
9	Quang Nam	10	80%	70%	50%	40%	40%	10%	10%	9.7
10	Ha Noi	10	70%	60%	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.8
11	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	10	60%	30%	20%	20%	20%	10%	10%	7.6
12	Nam Dinh	10	70%	40%	40%	10%	10%	10%	10%	8.1
13	Sanna Khanh Hoa	10	60%	50%	40%	20%	10%	10%	0%	7.7
14	FLC Thanh Hoa	9	33%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	6.11

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Song Lam Nghe An	19	68%	63%	53%	42%	32%	21%	16%	4.79
2	Ho Chi Minh City	19	42%	37%	32%	21%	5%	5%	5%	3.32
3	Binh Duong	19	68%	37%	32%	16%	16%	11%	0%	3.58
4	Sanna Khanh Hoa	19	63%	53%	47%	32%	32%	26%	16%	4.37
5	FLC Thanh Hoa	19	74%	53%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5%	3.89
6	Hai Phong	19	79%	74%	68%	53%	26%	21%	11%	5.47
7	Ha Noi	19	89%	84%	68%	53%	32%	26%	16%	5.89
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	19	63%	42%	21%	16%	5%	5%	5%	3.47
9	Quang Nam	19	58%	37%	26%	11%	11%	11%	5%	3.53
10	Nam Dinh	19	63%	58%	42%	32%	21%	11%	5%	4.05
11	Viettel	19	95%	79%	63%	37%	37%	21%	21%	6
12	Công An Nhân Dân	19	79%	74%	58%	42%	32%	11%	5%	4.95
13	Binh Dinh	19	89%	63%	58%	21%	16%	5%	5%	4.58
14	Hà Nội II	19	79%	68%	63%	42%	21%	21%	11%	5.05

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Song Lam Nghe An	10	70%	60%	50%	40%	30%	10%	10%	4.5
2	Ho Chi Minh City	9	33%	22%	22%	22%	11%	11%	11%	3.33
3	Binh Duong	10	60%	40%	30%	10%	10%	0%	0%	3.2
4	Sanna Khanh Hoa	9	56%	56%	56%	33%	33%	33%	22%	4.44
5	FLC Thanh Hoa	10	90%	80%	50%	40%	30%	20%	10%	5.3
6	Hai Phong	10	80%	70%	70%	60%	30%	30%	10%	5.5
7	Ha Noi	9	89%	89%	67%	56%	33%	33%	22%	6.44
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	9	78%	56%	22%	11%	0%	0%	0%	3.67
9	Quang Nam	9	56%	22%	22%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.78
10	Nam Dinh	9	67%	67%	56%	33%	22%	11%	11%	4.44
11	Viettel	10	100%	100%	80%	50%	50%	30%	30%	7.1
12	Công An Nhân Dân	10	80%	80%	50%	30%	20%	20%	10%	5
13	Binh Dinh	9	89%	44%	44%	11%	11%	0%	0%	4
14	Hà Nội II	10	80%	80%	80%	60%	40%	40%	20%	6

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Song Lam Nghe An	9	67%	67%	56%	44%	33%	33%	22%	5.11
2	Ho Chi Minh City	10	50%	50%	40%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.3
3	Binh Duong	9	78%	33%	33%	22%	22%	22%	0%	4
4	Sanna Khanh Hoa	10	70%	50%	40%	30%	30%	20%	10%	4.3
5	FLC Thanh Hoa	9	56%	22%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.33
6	Hai Phong	9	78%	78%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11%	5.44
7	Ha Noi	10	90%	80%	70%	50%	30%	20%	10%	5.4
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	10	50%	30%	20%	20%	10%	10%	10%	3.3
9	Quang Nam	10	60%	50%	30%	20%	20%	20%	10%	4.2
10	Nam Dinh	10	60%	50%	30%	30%	20%	10%	0%	3.7
11	Viettel	9	89%	56%	44%	22%	22%	11%	11%	4.78
12	Công An Nhân Dân	9	78%	67%	67%	56%	44%	0%	0%	4.89
13	Binh Dinh	10	90%	80%	70%	30%	20%	10%	10%	5.1
14	Hà Nội II	9	78%	56%	44%	22%	0%	0%	0%	4

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Song Lam Nghe An	19	79%	68%	47%	32%	11%	5%	0%	4.37
2	Ho Chi Minh City	19	100%	84%	63%	47%	37%	26%	11%	5.95
3	Binh Duong	19	84%	74%	63%	58%	42%	37%	26%	6.37
4	Sanna Khanh Hoa	19	58%	37%	37%	26%	11%	5%	5%	3.68
5	FLC Thanh Hoa	19	74%	58%	53%	11%	5%	5%	0%	3.95
6	Hai Phong	19	58%	53%	47%	21%	16%	11%	5%	3.68
7	Ha Noi	19	53%	42%	16%	5%	5%	0%	0%	2.68
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	19	79%	74%	68%	42%	21%	11%	0%	4.84
9	Quang Nam	19	74%	58%	58%	42%	37%	26%	11%	5.11
10	Nam Dinh	19	74%	58%	32%	16%	5%	5%	5%	4
11	Viettel	19	53%	26%	26%	21%	16%	11%	11%	3.47
12	Công An Nhân Dân	19	79%	63%	47%	32%	26%	21%	16%	4.89
13	Binh Dinh	19	74%	68%	58%	53%	42%	32%	26%	5.58
14	Hà Nội II	19	74%	58%	42%	32%	26%	11%	11%	4.37

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Song Lam Nghe An	10	70%	60%	50%	30%	20%	10%	0%	4.3
2	Ho Chi Minh City	9	100%	78%	56%	44%	33%	33%	11%	6.11
3	Binh Duong	10	90%	80%	70%	60%	40%	30%	20%	6.2
4	Sanna Khanh Hoa	9	78%	33%	33%	33%	11%	11%	11%	4
5	FLC Thanh Hoa	10	80%	60%	60%	10%	0%	0%	0%	4.1
6	Hai Phong	10	40%	40%	30%	20%	20%	10%	10%	3.1
7	Ha Noi	9	67%	56%	22%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	9	78%	67%	67%	67%	44%	22%	0%	5.44
9	Quang Nam	9	67%	44%	44%	33%	33%	11%	11%	4.67
10	Nam Dinh	9	67%	56%	33%	11%	0%	0%	0%	3.56
11	Viettel	10	60%	40%	40%	30%	20%	10%	10%	3.9
12	Công An Nhân Dân	10	70%	50%	30%	20%	10%	10%	0%	3.7
13	Binh Dinh	9	56%	44%	33%	22%	11%	0%	0%	3.33
14	Hà Nội II	10	70%	60%	40%	30%	30%	20%	20%	4.4

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Song Lam Nghe An	9	89%	78%	44%	33%	0%	0%	0%	4.44
2	Ho Chi Minh City	10	100%	90%	70%	50%	40%	20%	10%	5.8
3	Binh Duong	9	78%	67%	56%	56%	44%	44%	33%	6.56
4	Sanna Khanh Hoa	10	40%	40%	40%	20%	10%	0%	0%	3.4
5	FLC Thanh Hoa	9	67%	56%	44%	11%	11%	11%	0%	3.78
6	Hai Phong	9	78%	67%	67%	22%	11%	11%	0%	4.33
7	Ha Noi	10	40%	30%	10%	10%	10%	0%	0%	2.4
8	Hoang Anh Gia Lai	10	80%	80%	70%	20%	0%	0%	0%	4.3
9	Quang Nam	10	80%	70%	70%	50%	40%	40%	10%	5.5
10	Nam Dinh	10	80%	60%	30%	20%	10%	10%	10%	4.4
11	Viettel	9	44%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	11%	3
12	Công An Nhân Dân	9	89%	78%	67%	44%	44%	33%	33%	6.22
13	Binh Dinh	10	90%	90%	80%	80%	70%	60%	50%	7.6
14	Hà Nội II	9	78%	56%	44%	33%	22%	0%	0%	4.33