# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 1 | 100% |
2 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 2 | 100% |
3 | Sacramento Republic | 3 | 100% |
4 | Louisville City | 2 | 100% |
5 | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 100% |
6 | Las Vegas Lights | 3 | 67% |
7 | Loudoun United | 3 | 67% |
8 | New Mexico United | 3 | 67% |
9 | Miami FC | 3 | 67% |
10 | San Antonio | 3 | 67% |
11 | Charleston Battery | 3 | 67% |
12 | Detroit City FC | 2 | 50% |
13 | Rhode Island | 2 | 50% |
14 | Birmingham Legion | 2 | 50% |
15 | Indy Eleven | 3 | 33% |
16 | Monterey Bay | 3 | 33% |
17 | Orange County SC | 3 | 33% |
18 | Phoenix Rising | 3 | 33% |
19 | Oakland Roots | 3 | 33% |
20 | El Paso Locomotive | 4 | 25% |
21 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 0% |
22 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 0% |
23 | Memphis 901 | 2 | 0% |
24 | North Carolina FC | 3 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 1 | 100% |
2 | Sacramento Republic | 1 | 100% |
3 | Charleston Battery | 1 | 100% |
4 | Louisville City | 1 | 100% |
5 | San Antonio | 2 | 100% |
6 | New Mexico United | 1 | 100% |
7 | Loudoun United | 1 | 100% |
8 | Hartford Athletic | 1 | 100% |
9 | Miami FC | 2 | 50% |
10 | Phoenix Rising | 2 | 50% |
11 | Las Vegas Lights | 2 | 50% |
12 | Monterey Bay | 2 | 50% |
13 | Oakland Roots | 2 | 50% |
14 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 33% |
15 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 1 | 0% |
16 | Colorado Springs | 1 | 0% |
17 | Detroit City FC | 1 | 0% |
18 | Rhode Island | 1 | 0% |
19 | Orange County SC | 1 | 0% |
20 | Memphis 901 | 2 | 0% |
21 | North Carolina FC | 2 | 0% |
22 | Indy Eleven | 1 | 0% |
23 | Birmingham Legion | 0 | 0% |
24 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miami FC | 1 | 100% |
2 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 1 | 100% |
3 | Las Vegas Lights | 1 | 100% |
4 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 1 | 100% |
5 | Sacramento Republic | 2 | 100% |
6 | Louisville City | 1 | 100% |
7 | Hartford Athletic | 1 | 100% |
8 | Detroit City FC | 1 | 100% |
9 | Rhode Island | 1 | 100% |
10 | Loudoun United | 2 | 50% |
11 | Orange County SC | 2 | 50% |
12 | Indy Eleven | 2 | 50% |
13 | New Mexico United | 2 | 50% |
14 | Birmingham Legion | 2 | 50% |
15 | Charleston Battery | 2 | 50% |
16 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 0% |
17 | El Paso Locomotive | 1 | 0% |
18 | Colorado Springs | 2 | 0% |
19 | Oakland Roots | 1 | 0% |
20 | San Antonio | 1 | 0% |
21 | Memphis 901 | 0 | 0% |
22 | Monterey Bay | 1 | 0% |
23 | North Carolina FC | 1 | 0% |
24 | Phoenix Rising | 1 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 100% |
2 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 100% |
3 | Memphis 901 | 2 | 100% |
4 | El Paso Locomotive | 4 | 75% |
5 | Orange County SC | 3 | 67% |
6 | Oakland Roots | 3 | 67% |
7 | Monterey Bay | 3 | 67% |
8 | Indy Eleven | 3 | 67% |
9 | Phoenix Rising | 3 | 67% |
10 | North Carolina FC | 3 | 67% |
11 | Rhode Island | 2 | 50% |
12 | Detroit City FC | 2 | 50% |
13 | Birmingham Legion | 2 | 50% |
14 | New Mexico United | 3 | 33% |
15 | San Antonio | 3 | 33% |
16 | Loudoun United | 3 | 33% |
17 | Las Vegas Lights | 3 | 33% |
18 | Miami FC | 3 | 33% |
19 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 1 | 0% |
20 | Sacramento Republic | 3 | 0% |
21 | Charleston Battery | 3 | 0% |
22 | Louisville City | 2 | 0% |
23 | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 0% |
24 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 2 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Indy Eleven | 1 | 100% |
2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 1 | 100% |
3 | Colorado Springs | 1 | 100% |
4 | Orange County SC | 1 | 100% |
5 | Memphis 901 | 2 | 100% |
6 | Detroit City FC | 1 | 100% |
7 | Rhode Island | 1 | 100% |
8 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 67% |
9 | Oakland Roots | 2 | 50% |
10 | Monterey Bay | 2 | 50% |
11 | North Carolina FC | 2 | 50% |
12 | Miami FC | 2 | 50% |
13 | Phoenix Rising | 2 | 50% |
14 | Las Vegas Lights | 2 | 50% |
15 | Sacramento Republic | 1 | 0% |
16 | Charleston Battery | 1 | 0% |
17 | Louisville City | 1 | 0% |
18 | San Antonio | 2 | 0% |
19 | New Mexico United | 1 | 0% |
20 | Loudoun United | 1 | 0% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 1 | 0% |
22 | Birmingham Legion | 0 | 0% |
23 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 1 | 0% |
24 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 1 | 100% |
2 | Phoenix Rising | 1 | 100% |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 100% |
4 | Colorado Springs | 2 | 100% |
5 | San Antonio | 1 | 100% |
6 | El Paso Locomotive | 1 | 100% |
7 | Oakland Roots | 1 | 100% |
8 | Monterey Bay | 1 | 100% |
9 | Loudoun United | 2 | 50% |
10 | Orange County SC | 2 | 50% |
11 | Indy Eleven | 2 | 50% |
12 | New Mexico United | 2 | 50% |
13 | Birmingham Legion | 2 | 50% |
14 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 1 | 0% |
15 | Sacramento Republic | 2 | 0% |
16 | Charleston Battery | 2 | 0% |
17 | Detroit City FC | 1 | 0% |
18 | Louisville City | 1 | 0% |
19 | Rhode Island | 1 | 0% |
20 | Memphis 901 | 0 | 0% |
21 | Hartford Athletic | 1 | 0% |
22 | Miami FC | 1 | 0% |
23 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 1 | 0% |
24 | Las Vegas Lights | 1 | 0% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Oakland Roots scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2024.
Through this stat, we can see whether Oakland Roots is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, Oakland Roots has scored before the opponent in 33% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 67%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Oakland Roots’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Oakland Roots being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.