China
China League One

Añadir a los Favoritos

Nantong Zhiyun 2 - 0 Sichuan Jiuniu

18.12.2021 - 01:30

Estadio: Tazi Lake Sports Centre (Wuhan)

Terminado

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	21%	15%	9%	9.61
2	Meizhou Hakka	34	71%	65%	47%	35%	24%	6%	3%	9.38
3	Nanjing City	34	59%	44%	29%	26%	15%	9%	3%	9
4	Suzhou Dongwu	34	62%	56%	47%	35%	18%	15%	6%	8.97
5	Beijing BG	34	56%	50%	41%	32%	26%	15%	12%	8.85
6	Kunshan	34	50%	47%	35%	29%	24%	15%	9%	8.78
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	29%	24%	12%	6%	3%	8.68
8	Shenyang Urban	34	53%	41%	32%	26%	24%	12%	9%	8.53
9	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	56%	44%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	8.48
10	Hangzhou	34	59%	47%	24%	24%	18%	12%	9%	8.29
11	BIT	34	47%	32%	24%	15%	6%	6%	6%	8.23
12	Nantong Zhiyun	34	44%	35%	24%	24%	18%	15%	9%	8.1
13	Wuhan Three Towns	34	56%	44%	26%	21%	15%	3%	0%	7.97
14	Chengdu Better City FC	34	47%	32%	24%	18%	18%	9%	6%	7.87
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	44%	29%	24%	21%	15%	9%	9%	7.85
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	38%	26%	18%	9%	9%	3%	0%	7.14
17	Zibo Cuju	34	50%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3%	3%	7.13
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	41%	26%	21%	15%	9%	3%	0%	7.01

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Nanjing City	17	65%	59%	41%	41%	24%	12%	0%	9.85
2	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	59%	41%	35%	18%	12%	6%	9.66
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	65%	59%	47%	35%	29%	6%	6%	9.44
4	Beijing BG	17	59%	53%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	9.41
5	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	6%	9
6	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	8.84
7	Kunshan	17	53%	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	12%	8.82
8	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59%	47%	29%	29%	18%	18%	12%	8.69
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	8
10	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	0%	0%	7.94
11	Hangzhou	17	59%	41%	12%	12%	6%	6%	6%	7.89
12	Chengdu Better City FC	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	7.88
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	0%	0%	7.82
14	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47%	35%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.81
15	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	6%	0%	7.71
16	BIT	17	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	7.43
17	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	24%	12%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6.94
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	35%	24%	24%	12%	12%	6%	0%	6.87

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	12%	10.19
2	Suzhou Dongwu	17	76%	76%	71%	53%	35%	29%	12%	10.06
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	76%	71%	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	9.32
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	9
5	BIT	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	12%	12%	12%	8.94
6	Kunshan	17	47%	41%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	8.71
7	Hangzhou	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	29%	18%	12%	8.71
8	Beijing BG	17	53%	47%	41%	29%	18%	0%	0%	8.25
9	Nanjing City	17	53%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	8.2
10	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	24%	24%	18%	6%	0%	8.11
11	Shenyang Urban	17	41%	35%	35%	35%	29%	12%	12%	8.07
12	Chengdu Better City FC	17	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	6%	6%	7.88
13	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.75
14	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	35%	24%	18%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.69
15	Nantong Zhiyun	17	29%	24%	18%	18%	18%	12%	6%	7.43
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	41%	29%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	7.43
17	Zibo Cuju	17	53%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	7.34
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	29%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	6.2

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Meizhou Hakka	34	79%	74%	56%	44%	38%	29%	15%	5.66
2	Hangzhou	34	82%	62%	50%	44%	38%	26%	9%	5.47
3	Wuhan Three Towns	34	88%	76%	59%	38%	21%	21%	15%	5.39
4	Nantong Zhiyun	34	82%	71%	44%	35%	26%	15%	6%	5.2
5	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	76%	56%	50%	38%	29%	26%	18%	5.13
6	Chengdu Better City FC	34	79%	65%	50%	35%	18%	12%	9%	5.03
7	Kunshan	34	76%	62%	53%	32%	18%	12%	6%	4.84
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	71%	56%	41%	26%	21%	18%	9%	4.52
9	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	68%	53%	41%	26%	12%	9%	6%	4.18
10	Shenyang Urban	34	59%	35%	29%	18%	12%	9%	9%	3.7
11	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	50%	41%	35%	26%	9%	6%	3%	3.63
12	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	38%	35%	24%	24%	18%	9%	6%	3.54
13	Beijing BG	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	6%	6%	6%	3.52
14	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	41%	32%	24%	12%	6%	3%	0%	3.07
15	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	47%	35%	21%	15%	3%	3%	0%	3.03
16	BIT	34	35%	24%	21%	9%	9%	6%	6%	3.03
17	Nanjing City	34	44%	32%	21%	15%	6%	3%	3%	2.97
18	Zibo Cuju	34	41%	26%	12%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.52

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	17	94%	71%	53%	47%	41%	18%	6%	5.71
2	Meizhou Hakka	17	88%	76%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.69
3	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	76%	65%	59%	35%	35%	29%	18%	5.53
4	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	53%	41%	35%	18%	0%	5.44
5	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	76%	53%	35%	24%	24%	12%	5.44
6	Kunshan	17	82%	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	4.94
7	Chengdu Better City FC	17	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.88
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.47
9	Shenyang Urban	17	71%	41%	35%	18%	12%	6%	6%	3.93
10	Suzhou Dongwu	17	53%	41%	29%	18%	18%	18%	6%	3.81
11	Nanjing City	17	41%	41%	35%	29%	12%	6%	6%	3.71
12	Beijing BG	17	65%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	6%	3.59
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	47%	41%	35%	24%	12%	12%	6%	3.59
14	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	24%	24%	24%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.42
15	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	41%	29%	18%	18%	6%	6%	0%	3.07
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	35%	24%	18%	18%	6%	6%	0%	2.8
17	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.75
18	BIT	17	18%	12%	12%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	71%	53%	47%	41%	29%	18%	5.63
2	Wuhan Three Towns	17	94%	76%	65%	41%	18%	18%	18%	5.35
3	Hangzhou	17	71%	53%	47%	41%	35%	35%	12%	5.24
4	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	76%	59%	41%	18%	12%	6%	5.19
5	Suzhou Dongwu	17	88%	71%	53%	35%	24%	18%	12%	5.18
6	Nantong Zhiyun	17	71%	59%	35%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.93
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	76%	47%	41%	41%	24%	24%	18%	4.75
8	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	47%	24%	12%	6%	6%	4.71
9	BIT	17	53%	35%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	3.94
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	71%	53%	35%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
11	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	53%	41%	35%	29%	6%	0%	0%	3.67
12	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	53%	47%	24%	24%	18%	6%	6%	3.63
13	Shenyang Urban	17	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	12%	3.47
14	Beijing BG	17	65%	35%	24%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.44
15	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	47%	41%	29%	6%	6%	0%	0%	3.36
16	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	53%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3
17	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.27
18	Nanjing City	17	47%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.27

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65%	59%	53%	47%	32%	26%	15%	6.07
2	Nanjing City	34	71%	68%	59%	38%	29%	24%	15%	6.03
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	74%	62%	59%	44%	32%	21%	15%	5.45
4	Beijing BG	34	82%	62%	56%	41%	29%	26%	12%	5.33
5	BIT	34	79%	79%	56%	29%	18%	15%	9%	5.2
6	Shenyang Urban	34	74%	62%	38%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.83
7	Zibo Cuju	34	74%	65%	47%	41%	12%	3%	3%	4.61
8	Suzhou Dongwu	34	74%	53%	44%	29%	24%	15%	9%	4.45
9	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	62%	47%	32%	18%	15%	9%	6%	4.07
10	Kunshan	34	56%	41%	29%	24%	15%	15%	9%	3.94
11	Meizhou Hakka	34	59%	53%	29%	18%	12%	3%	3%	3.72
12	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	74%	47%	26%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
13	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	53%	38%	29%	18%	6%	6%	3%	3.55
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	53%	35%	26%	15%	12%	9%	3%	3.38
15	Nantong Zhiyun	34	41%	35%	24%	18%	9%	3%	3%	2.9
16	Chengdu Better City FC	34	50%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	3%	2.84
17	Hangzhou	34	50%	24%	15%	12%	6%	6%	3%	2.82
18	Wuhan Three Towns	34	35%	21%	15%	9%	9%	6%	0%	2.58

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Nanjing City	17	65%	59%	59%	47%	35%	24%	18%	6.14
2	Beijing BG	17	88%	65%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	5.82
3	BIT	17	76%	76%	65%	35%	12%	12%	6%	5.43
4	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	47%	47%	41%	35%	18%	18%	12%	5.42
5	Shenyang Urban	17	88%	71%	41%	29%	12%	12%	6%	5.07
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.87
7	Zibo Cuju	17	71%	65%	41%	35%	6%	0%	0%	4.19
8	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	47%	35%	29%	12%	12%	6%	4.13
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	71%	53%	41%	24%	18%	18%	6%	4.12
10	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.07
11	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	4
12	Kunshan	17	59%	47%	29%	24%	12%	12%	12%	3.88
13	Meizhou Hakka	17	65%	65%	18%	12%	12%	6%	6%	3.75
14	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	76%	41%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.53
15	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53%	47%	24%	18%	18%	6%	6%	3.25
16	Chengdu Better City FC	17	59%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3
17	Wuhan Three Towns	17	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	0%	2.38
18	Hangzhou	17	41%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.18

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	59%	47%	35%	18%	6.56
2	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	71%	71%	59%	47%	29%	18%	6
3	Nanjing City	17	76%	76%	59%	29%	24%	24%	12%	5.93
4	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	65%	53%	47%	18%	6%	6%	5.07
5	BIT	17	82%	82%	47%	24%	24%	18%	12%	5
6	Suzhou Dongwu	17	76%	59%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
7	Beijing BG	17	76%	59%	47%	35%	24%	24%	0%	4.81
8	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.6
9	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	59%	47%	35%	12%	12%	12%	6%	4.07
10	Kunshan	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	18%	18%	6%	4
11	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	71%	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.81
12	Meizhou Hakka	17	53%	41%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	3.69
13	Hangzhou	17	59%	41%	24%	24%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
14	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	47%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	3
15	Wuhan Three Towns	17	41%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.76
16	Chengdu Better City FC	17	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.69
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	35%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	2.53
18	Nantong Zhiyun	17	29%	24%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	2.5

Partido anterior

Kunshan Logotipo del equipo

Guizhou Zhicheng Logotipo del equipo

Shenyang Urban Logotipo del equipo

Shaanxi Chang'an Logotipo del equipo

Siguiente Partido