China
China League One

Añadir a los Favoritos

Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1 - 0 Xinjiang Tianshan

20.12.2021 - 02:00

Lugar: Chengdu Longquanyi Football Stadium (Chengdu)

Finalizado

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería en Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	68%	53%	35%	26%	21%	15%	9%	9.61
2	Meizhou Hakka	34	71%	65%	47%	35%	24%	6%	3%	9.38
3	Nanjing City	34	59%	44%	29%	26%	15%	9%	3%	9
4	Suzhou Dongwu	34	62%	56%	47%	35%	18%	15%	6%	8.97
5	Beijing BG	34	56%	50%	41%	32%	26%	15%	12%	8.85
6	Kunshan	34	50%	47%	35%	29%	24%	15%	9%	8.78
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	65%	53%	29%	24%	12%	6%	3%	8.68
8	Shenyang Urban	34	53%	41%	32%	26%	24%	12%	9%	8.53
9	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	56%	44%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	8.48
10	Hangzhou	34	59%	47%	24%	24%	18%	12%	9%	8.29
11	BIT	34	47%	32%	24%	15%	6%	6%	6%	8.23
12	Nantong Zhiyun	34	44%	35%	24%	24%	18%	15%	9%	8.1
13	Wuhan Three Towns	34	56%	44%	26%	21%	15%	3%	0%	7.97
14	Chengdu Better City FC	34	47%	32%	24%	18%	18%	9%	6%	7.87
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	44%	29%	24%	21%	15%	9%	9%	7.85
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	38%	26%	18%	9%	9%	3%	0%	7.14
17	Zibo Cuju	34	50%	26%	15%	9%	3%	3%	3%	7.13
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	41%	26%	21%	15%	9%	3%	0%	7.01

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	53%	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	8.84
2	Meizhou Hakka	17	65%	59%	47%	35%	29%	6%	6%	9.44
3	Nanjing City	17	65%	59%	41%	41%	24%	12%	0%	9.85
4	Suzhou Dongwu	17	47%	35%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.81
5	Beijing BG	17	59%	53%	41%	35%	35%	29%	24%	9.41
6	Kunshan	17	53%	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	12%	8.82
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	71%	59%	41%	35%	18%	12%	6%	9.66
8	Shenyang Urban	17	65%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	6%	9
9	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	0%	0%	7.94
10	Hangzhou	17	59%	41%	12%	12%	6%	6%	6%	7.89
11	BIT	17	35%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	7.43
12	Nantong Zhiyun	17	59%	47%	29%	29%	18%	18%	12%	8.69
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	0%	0%	7.82
14	Chengdu Better City FC	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	7.88
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	8
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	35%	24%	24%	12%	12%	6%	0%	6.87
17	Zibo Cuju	17	47%	24%	12%	12%	6%	6%	6%	6.94
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	6%	0%	7.71

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	12%	10.19
2	Meizhou Hakka	17	76%	71%	47%	35%	18%	6%	0%	9.32
3	Nanjing City	17	53%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	8.2
4	Suzhou Dongwu	17	76%	76%	71%	53%	35%	29%	12%	10.06
5	Beijing BG	17	53%	47%	41%	29%	18%	0%	0%	8.25
6	Kunshan	17	47%	41%	29%	24%	24%	12%	6%	8.71
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	47%	18%	12%	6%	0%	0%	7.75
8	Shenyang Urban	17	41%	35%	35%	35%	29%	12%	12%	8.07
9	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	65%	59%	41%	24%	12%	12%	12%	9
10	Hangzhou	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	29%	18%	12%	8.71
11	BIT	17	59%	35%	29%	24%	12%	12%	12%	8.94
12	Nantong Zhiyun	17	29%	24%	18%	18%	18%	12%	6%	7.43
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	24%	24%	18%	6%	0%	8.11
14	Chengdu Better City FC	17	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	6%	6%	7.88
15	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	35%	24%	18%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.69
16	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	41%	29%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	7.43
17	Zibo Cuju	17	53%	29%	18%	6%	0%	0%	0%	7.34
18	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	29%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	6.2

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	34	82%	62%	50%	44%	38%	26%	9%	5.47
2	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	41%	32%	24%	12%	6%	3%	0%	3.07
3	Meizhou Hakka	34	79%	74%	56%	44%	38%	29%	15%	5.66
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	47%	35%	21%	15%	3%	3%	0%	3.03
5	Beijing BG	34	65%	38%	26%	15%	6%	6%	6%	3.52
6	BIT	34	35%	24%	21%	9%	9%	6%	6%	3.03
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	38%	35%	24%	24%	18%	9%	6%	3.54
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	68%	53%	41%	26%	12%	9%	6%	4.18
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	76%	56%	50%	38%	29%	26%	18%	5.13
10	Nantong Zhiyun	34	82%	71%	44%	35%	26%	15%	6%	5.2
11	Wuhan Three Towns	34	88%	76%	59%	38%	21%	21%	15%	5.39
12	Zibo Cuju	34	41%	26%	12%	6%	3%	3%	0%	2.52
13	Shenyang Urban	34	59%	35%	29%	18%	12%	9%	9%	3.7
14	Suzhou Dongwu	34	71%	56%	41%	26%	21%	18%	9%	4.52
15	Chengdu Better City FC	34	79%	65%	50%	35%	18%	12%	9%	5.03
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	50%	41%	35%	26%	9%	6%	3%	3.63
17	Kunshan	34	76%	62%	53%	32%	18%	12%	6%	4.84
18	Nanjing City	34	44%	32%	21%	15%	6%	3%	3%	2.97

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	17	94%	71%	53%	47%	41%	18%	6%	5.71
2	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	35%	24%	18%	18%	6%	6%	0%	2.8
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	88%	76%	59%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.69
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	41%	29%	18%	18%	6%	6%	0%	3.07
5	Beijing BG	17	65%	41%	29%	18%	6%	6%	6%	3.59
6	BIT	17	18%	12%	12%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	24%	24%	24%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.42
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	65%	53%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.47
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	76%	65%	59%	35%	35%	29%	18%	5.53
10	Nantong Zhiyun	17	94%	82%	53%	41%	35%	18%	0%	5.44
11	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	76%	53%	35%	24%	24%	12%	5.44
12	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.75
13	Shenyang Urban	17	71%	41%	35%	18%	12%	6%	6%	3.93
14	Suzhou Dongwu	17	53%	41%	29%	18%	18%	18%	6%	3.81
15	Chengdu Better City FC	17	76%	53%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.88
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	47%	41%	35%	24%	12%	12%	6%	3.59
17	Kunshan	17	82%	71%	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	4.94
18	Nanjing City	17	41%	41%	35%	29%	12%	6%	6%	3.71

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	17	71%	53%	47%	41%	35%	35%	12%	5.24
2	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	47%	41%	29%	6%	6%	0%	0%	3.36
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	71%	53%	47%	41%	29%	18%	5.63
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	53%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3
5	Beijing BG	17	65%	35%	24%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3.44
6	BIT	17	53%	35%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	3.94
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	53%	47%	24%	24%	18%	6%	6%	3.63
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	71%	53%	35%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.88
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	76%	47%	41%	41%	24%	24%	18%	4.75
10	Nantong Zhiyun	17	71%	59%	35%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.93
11	Wuhan Three Towns	17	94%	76%	65%	41%	18%	18%	18%	5.35
12	Zibo Cuju	17	41%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.27
13	Shenyang Urban	17	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	12%	12%	3.47
14	Suzhou Dongwu	17	88%	71%	53%	35%	24%	18%	12%	5.18
15	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	76%	59%	41%	18%	12%	6%	5.19
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	53%	41%	35%	29%	6%	0%	0%	3.67
17	Kunshan	17	71%	53%	47%	24%	12%	6%	6%	4.71
18	Nanjing City	17	47%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.27

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	34	50%	24%	15%	12%	6%	6%	3%	2.82
2	Guizhou Zhicheng	34	62%	47%	32%	18%	15%	9%	6%	4.07
3	Meizhou Hakka	34	59%	53%	29%	18%	12%	3%	3%	3.72
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	74%	62%	59%	44%	32%	21%	15%	5.45
5	Beijing BG	34	82%	62%	56%	41%	29%	26%	12%	5.33
6	BIT	34	79%	79%	56%	29%	18%	15%	9%	5.2
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	65%	59%	53%	47%	32%	26%	15%	6.07
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	74%	47%	26%	18%	9%	6%	3%	3.67
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	53%	38%	29%	18%	6%	6%	3%	3.55
10	Nantong Zhiyun	34	41%	35%	24%	18%	9%	3%	3%	2.9
11	Wuhan Three Towns	34	35%	21%	15%	9%	9%	6%	0%	2.58
12	Zibo Cuju	34	74%	65%	47%	41%	12%	3%	3%	4.61
13	Shenyang Urban	34	74%	62%	38%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.83
14	Suzhou Dongwu	34	74%	53%	44%	29%	24%	15%	9%	4.45
15	Chengdu Better City FC	34	50%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	3%	2.84
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	53%	35%	26%	15%	12%	9%	3%	3.38
17	Kunshan	34	56%	41%	29%	24%	15%	15%	9%	3.94
18	Nanjing City	34	71%	68%	59%	38%	29%	24%	15%	6.03

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	17	41%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.18
2	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	18%	6%	6%	4.07
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	65%	65%	18%	12%	12%	6%	6%	3.75
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.87
5	Beijing BG	17	88%	65%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	5.82
6	BIT	17	76%	76%	65%	35%	12%	12%	6%	5.43
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	47%	47%	41%	35%	18%	18%	12%	5.42
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	76%	41%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.53
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	59%	47%	35%	29%	12%	12%	6%	4.13
10	Nantong Zhiyun	17	53%	47%	24%	18%	18%	6%	6%	3.25
11	Wuhan Three Towns	17	29%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	0%	2.38
12	Zibo Cuju	17	71%	65%	41%	35%	6%	0%	0%	4.19
13	Shenyang Urban	17	88%	71%	41%	29%	12%	12%	6%	5.07
14	Suzhou Dongwu	17	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	12%	4
15	Chengdu Better City FC	17	59%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	6%	3
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	71%	53%	41%	24%	18%	18%	6%	4.12
17	Kunshan	17	59%	47%	29%	24%	12%	12%	12%	3.88
18	Nanjing City	17	65%	59%	59%	47%	35%	24%	18%	6.14

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	17	59%	41%	24%	24%	12%	12%	6%	3.47
2	Guizhou Zhicheng	17	59%	47%	35%	12%	12%	12%	6%	4.07
3	Meizhou Hakka	17	53%	41%	41%	24%	12%	0%	0%	3.69
4	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	71%	71%	59%	47%	29%	18%	6
5	Beijing BG	17	76%	59%	47%	35%	24%	24%	0%	4.81
6	BIT	17	82%	82%	47%	24%	24%	18%	12%	5
7	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	82%	71%	65%	59%	47%	35%	18%	6.56
8	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	71%	53%	18%	18%	12%	12%	6%	3.81
9	Shaanxi Chang'an	17	47%	29%	24%	6%	0%	0%	0%	3
10	Nantong Zhiyun	17	29%	24%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
11	Wuhan Three Towns	17	41%	24%	18%	12%	12%	6%	0%	2.76
12	Zibo Cuju	17	76%	65%	53%	47%	18%	6%	6%	5.07
13	Shenyang Urban	17	59%	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	18%	4.6
14	Suzhou Dongwu	17	76%	59%	59%	41%	29%	18%	6%	4.88
15	Chengdu Better City FC	17	41%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	2.69
16	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	35%	18%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	2.53
17	Kunshan	17	53%	35%	29%	24%	18%	18%	6%	4
18	Nanjing City	17	76%	76%	59%	29%	24%	24%	12%	5.93

Partido anterior

Shijiazhuang Ever Bright Logotipo del equipo

Tianjin Teda Logotipo del equipo

BIT Logotipo del equipo

Jiangxi Liansheng Logotipo del equipo

Siguiente Partido