China
China League One

Añadir a los Favoritos

Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0 - 0 Xinjiang Tianshan

10.10.2020 - 07:00

Finalizado

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería en Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	82%	71%	65%	41%	35%	24%	18%	10.18
2	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	87%	67%	60%	40%	20%	7%	7%	10
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	76%	65%	59%	41%	35%	24%	12%	9.88
4	Suzhou Dongwu	15	67%	67%	67%	53%	33%	27%	13%	9.86
5	Changchun Yatai	15	67%	60%	47%	40%	27%	27%	20%	9.6
6	Kunshan	15	67%	60%	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	9.47
7	Chengdu Better City FC	15	67%	40%	33%	27%	20%	20%	13%	9.07
8	Beijing Renhe	17	71%	47%	41%	18%	18%	6%	0%	9
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	59%	47%	35%	29%	18%	18%	12%	8.88
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	60%	60%	53%	33%	20%	7%	7%	8.87
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	15	67%	53%	47%	33%	27%	20%	7%	8.86
12	Nantong Zhiyun	15	53%	47%	33%	27%	27%	13%	13%	8.73
13	Shenyang Urban	15	67%	53%	40%	33%	20%	7%	0%	8.73
14	Beijing BG	15	53%	47%	33%	33%	27%	13%	0%	8.71
15	Meizhou Hakka	15	67%	40%	20%	20%	20%	20%	7%	8.53
16	Taizhou Yuanda	15	47%	27%	13%	7%	7%	7%	7%	8.06
17	Hangzhou	15	47%	33%	27%	13%	0%	0%	0%	7.33
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	15	60%	33%	27%	13%	7%	0%	0%	7.27

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	9	67%	56%	44%	44%	44%	22%	11%	9.23
2	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	7	86%	71%	57%	14%	0%	0%	0%	9.28
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	9	78%	78%	78%	56%	44%	22%	11%	10.11
4	Suzhou Dongwu	8	63%	63%	63%	38%	13%	13%	0%	8.63
5	Changchun Yatai	8	63%	50%	50%	50%	25%	25%	25%	9.76
6	Kunshan	7	71%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	0%	8.71
7	Chengdu Better City FC	8	75%	63%	50%	50%	38%	38%	25%	10.51
8	Beijing Renhe	8	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	0%	0%	8.76
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	8	63%	38%	25%	25%	25%	25%	25%	9.38
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	7	57%	57%	43%	14%	14%	14%	14%	8.72
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	7	71%	43%	43%	43%	29%	29%	0%	9.29
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	13%	13%	9.13
13	Shenyang Urban	8	38%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	0%	8
14	Beijing BG	8	63%	50%	38%	38%	38%	13%	0%	9.43
15	Meizhou Hakka	7	71%	43%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.71
16	Taizhou Yuanda	8	63%	25%	25%	13%	13%	13%	13%	9
17	Hangzhou	7	57%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	0%	8
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	7	57%	29%	29%	14%	0%	0%	0%	7.14

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	8	100%	88%	88%	38%	25%	25%	25%	11.26
2	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	8	88%	63%	63%	63%	38%	13%	13%	10.63
3	Xinjiang Tianshan	8	75%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	13%	9.63
4	Suzhou Dongwu	7	71%	71%	71%	71%	57%	43%	29%	11.29
5	Changchun Yatai	7	71%	71%	43%	29%	29%	29%	14%	9.43
6	Kunshan	8	63%	63%	50%	38%	25%	13%	13%	10.13
7	Chengdu Better City FC	7	57%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.43
8	Beijing Renhe	9	78%	44%	44%	11%	11%	11%	0%	9.25
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	9	56%	56%	44%	33%	11%	11%	0%	8.44
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	63%	63%	63%	50%	25%	0%	0%	9
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	8	63%	63%	50%	25%	25%	13%	13%	8.51
12	Nantong Zhiyun	7	43%	43%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	8.28
13	Shenyang Urban	7	100%	71%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	9.57
14	Beijing BG	7	43%	43%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	8
15	Meizhou Hakka	8	63%	38%	38%	38%	38%	38%	13%	9.26
16	Taizhou Yuanda	7	29%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7
17	Hangzhou	8	38%	13%	13%	13%	0%	0%	0%	6.75
18	Guizhou Zhicheng	8	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	0%	0%	7.38

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	15	60%	47%	13%	7%	7%	7%	7%	3.2
2	Changchun Yatai	15	100%	80%	73%	67%	47%	33%	20%	6.33
3	Beijing Renhe	17	82%	59%	41%	41%	29%	18%	12%	4.94
4	Guizhou Zhicheng	15	73%	60%	40%	33%	7%	0%	0%	4
5	Meizhou Hakka	15	73%	67%	47%	40%	27%	0%	0%	4.53
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	88%	71%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.59
7	Beijing BG	15	80%	67%	47%	20%	20%	13%	13%	5
8	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	67%	53%	27%	27%	27%	13%	7%	3.93
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	35%	24%	24%	18%	18%	18%	12%	3.35
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	88%	65%	53%	35%	29%	18%	18%	5.18
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	15	80%	73%	60%	47%	40%	13%	13%	5.13
12	Nantong Zhiyun	15	73%	33%	27%	20%	13%	7%	7%	3.73
13	Shenyang Urban	15	60%	40%	33%	13%	0%	0%	0%	3.13
14	Taizhou Yuanda	15	67%	33%	20%	20%	0%	0%	0%	3.13
15	Suzhou Dongwu	15	87%	73%	67%	53%	47%	33%	20%	5.73
16	Chengdu Better City FC	15	87%	73%	47%	47%	33%	27%	13%	5.4
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	80%	60%	47%	27%	20%	20%	20%	4.6
18	Kunshan	15	73%	60%	53%	33%	27%	13%	13%	4.8

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	7	71%	57%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	4
2	Changchun Yatai	8	100%	75%	75%	75%	50%	38%	13%	6.38
3	Beijing Renhe	8	75%	50%	25%	25%	25%	13%	13%	4.13
4	Guizhou Zhicheng	7	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	4
5	Meizhou Hakka	7	71%	71%	57%	43%	29%	0%	0%	4.71
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	9	78%	78%	56%	44%	22%	22%	22%	5
7	Beijing BG	8	88%	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	25%	6.57
8	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	7	57%	57%	29%	29%	29%	14%	14%	3.71
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	8	38%	38%	38%	38%	38%	38%	25%	4.38
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	9	89%	67%	44%	22%	11%	11%	11%	4.56
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	7	86%	86%	71%	57%	57%	29%	29%	6.29
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	75%	25%	25%	13%	13%	13%	13%	3.88
13	Shenyang Urban	8	63%	50%	38%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
14	Taizhou Yuanda	8	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	0%	0%	2.75
15	Suzhou Dongwu	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	63%	50%	25%	6.13
16	Chengdu Better City FC	8	88%	88%	50%	50%	38%	38%	13%	5.88
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	7	86%	71%	43%	14%	14%	14%	14%	4.43
18	Kunshan	7	57%	57%	57%	29%	29%	0%	0%	4.14

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	8	50%	38%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
2	Changchun Yatai	7	100%	86%	71%	57%	43%	29%	29%	6.29
3	Beijing Renhe	9	89%	67%	56%	56%	33%	22%	11%	5.75
4	Guizhou Zhicheng	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	0%	0%	0%	4
5	Meizhou Hakka	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	0%	0%	4.38
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	8	100%	63%	25%	13%	13%	0%	0%	4.13
7	Beijing BG	7	71%	57%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.43
8	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	8	75%	50%	25%	25%	25%	13%	0%	4.13
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	9	33%	11%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.44
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	8	88%	63%	63%	50%	50%	25%	25%	5.88
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	8	75%	63%	50%	38%	25%	0%	0%	4.13
12	Nantong Zhiyun	7	71%	43%	29%	29%	14%	0%	0%	3.57
13	Shenyang Urban	7	57%	29%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
14	Taizhou Yuanda	7	86%	29%	29%	29%	0%	0%	0%	3.57
15	Suzhou Dongwu	7	86%	71%	71%	43%	29%	14%	14%	5.29
16	Chengdu Better City FC	7	86%	57%	43%	43%	29%	14%	14%	4.86
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	75%	50%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	4.75
18	Kunshan	8	88%	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	5.38

General
Local
Visitante

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	15	73%	53%	53%	40%	7%	0%	0%	4.13
2	Changchun Yatai	15	53%	40%	27%	13%	13%	7%	7%	3.27
3	Beijing Renhe	17	71%	47%	35%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.06
4	Guizhou Zhicheng	15	60%	40%	33%	20%	7%	0%	0%	3.27
5	Meizhou Hakka	15	60%	53%	47%	27%	20%	7%	0%	4
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	17	94%	71%	53%	29%	24%	18%	18%	5.29
7	Beijing BG	15	67%	47%	20%	13%	7%	7%	7%	3.71
8	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	15	87%	73%	67%	60%	53%	47%	27%	6.07
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	17	88%	88%	53%	53%	35%	24%	18%	5.53
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	17	76%	65%	59%	53%	41%	12%	6%	5
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	15	60%	33%	27%	20%	13%	13%	13%	3.73
12	Nantong Zhiyun	15	80%	67%	47%	40%	33%	20%	20%	5
13	Shenyang Urban	15	87%	87%	67%	53%	47%	20%	20%	5.6
14	Taizhou Yuanda	15	87%	67%	33%	27%	27%	20%	13%	4.93
15	Suzhou Dongwu	15	60%	33%	20%	20%	20%	20%	20%	4.13
16	Chengdu Better City FC	15	67%	53%	20%	13%	13%	13%	7%	3.67
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	15	87%	53%	40%	20%	13%	7%	7%	4.27
18	Kunshan	15	93%	60%	53%	40%	13%	7%	0%	4.67

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	7	71%	43%	43%	43%	0%	0%	0%	4
2	Changchun Yatai	8	63%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.38
3	Beijing Renhe	8	88%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.63
4	Guizhou Zhicheng	7	71%	29%	29%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3.14
5	Meizhou Hakka	7	43%	29%	29%	14%	14%	0%	0%	3
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	9	89%	56%	44%	22%	22%	22%	22%	5.11
7	Beijing BG	8	50%	25%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.86
8	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	7	86%	71%	71%	57%	43%	29%	14%	5.57
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	8	88%	88%	50%	50%	25%	13%	13%	5
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	9	67%	67%	56%	44%	33%	11%	11%	4.67
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	7	71%	14%	14%	14%	0%	0%	0%	3
12	Nantong Zhiyun	8	88%	75%	50%	50%	38%	13%	13%	5.25
13	Shenyang Urban	8	75%	75%	50%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.5
14	Taizhou Yuanda	8	100%	100%	50%	38%	38%	25%	25%	6.25
15	Suzhou Dongwu	8	63%	13%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
16	Chengdu Better City FC	8	88%	63%	38%	25%	25%	25%	13%	4.63
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	7	86%	57%	43%	29%	14%	0%	0%	4.29
18	Kunshan	7	86%	57%	57%	43%	14%	0%	0%	4.57

#	Equipo	PJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Hangzhou	8	75%	63%	63%	38%	13%	0%	0%	4.25
2	Changchun Yatai	7	43%	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	14%	3.14
3	Beijing Renhe	9	56%	56%	33%	22%	11%	0%	0%	3.5
4	Guizhou Zhicheng	8	50%	50%	38%	25%	13%	0%	0%	3.38
5	Meizhou Hakka	8	75%	75%	63%	38%	25%	13%	0%	4.88
6	Xinjiang Tianshan	8	100%	88%	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	5.5
7	Beijing BG	7	86%	71%	29%	29%	14%	14%	14%	4.57
8	Nei Mongol Zhongyou	8	88%	75%	63%	63%	63%	63%	38%	6.5
9	Jiangxi Liansheng	9	89%	89%	56%	56%	44%	33%	22%	6
10	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	8	88%	63%	63%	63%	50%	13%	0%	5.38
11	Shaanxi Chang'an	8	50%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	25%	4.38
12	Nantong Zhiyun	7	71%	57%	43%	29%	29%	29%	29%	4.71
13	Shenyang Urban	7	100%	100%	86%	71%	71%	29%	29%	6.86
14	Taizhou Yuanda	7	71%	29%	14%	14%	14%	14%	0%	3.43
15	Suzhou Dongwu	7	57%	57%	43%	43%	43%	43%	43%	6
16	Chengdu Better City FC	7	43%	43%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.57
17	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	88%	50%	38%	13%	13%	13%	13%	4.25
18	Kunshan	8	100%	63%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	4.75

Partido anterior

Suzhou Dongwu Logotipo del equipo

Chengdu Better City FC Logotipo del equipo

Hangzhou Logotipo del equipo

Meizhou Hakka Logotipo del equipo

Siguiente Partido