Chattanooga Red Wolves 2 - 1 Inter Miami II
22.05.2021 - 23:00
Stadium : CHI Memorial Stadium (East Ridge, Tennessee)
Finished
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  North Carolina FC | 28 | 18 | 64% | 71% | 57% |
| 2 |  Toronto II | 28 | 15 | 54% | 50% | 57% |
| 3 |  Richmond Kickers | 29 | 14 | 48% | 29% | 67% |
| 4 |  FC Tucson | 30 | 18 | 60% | 53% | 67% |
| 5 |  South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 16 | 57% | 50% | 64% |
| 6 |  Greenville Triumph | 30 | 13 | 43% | 47% | 40% |
| 7 |  Forward Madison | 28 | 11 | 39% | 36% | 43% |
| 8 |  North Texas | 29 | 13 | 45% | 57% | 33% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 13 | 43% | 53% | 33% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 18 | 64% | 64% | 64% |
| 11 |  Union Omaha | 30 | 12 | 40% | 44% | 36% |
| 12 |  New England II | 28 | 13 | 46% | 50% | 43% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 24 | 86% | 100% | 71% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 26 | 93% | 86% | 100% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 26 | 90% | 86% | 93% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 29 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 27 | 90% | 87% | 93% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 27 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 27 | 90% | 100% | 80% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 29 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 20 | 71% | 79% | 64% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 19 | 68% | 64% | 71% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 19 | 66% | 50% | 80% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 24 | 80% | 87% | 73% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 21 | 75% | 64% | 86% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 21 | 70% | 67% | 73% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 19 | 68% | 64% | 71% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 23 | 79% | 86% | 73% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 20 | 67% | 80% | 53% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 22 | 79% | 79% | 79% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 22 | 73% | 75% | 71% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 16 | 57% | 57% | 57% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 10 | 36% | 36% | 36% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 4 | 14% | 7% | 21% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 8 | 28% | 29% | 27% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 11 | 37% | 27% | 47% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 12 | 43% | 43% | 43% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 6 | 20% | 33% | 7% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 7 | 25% | 14% | 36% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 7 | 24% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 7 | 23% | 20% | 27% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 10 | 36% | 50% | 21% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 6 | 20% | 25% | 14% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 8 | 29% | 14% | 43% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 7 | 25% | 29% | 21% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 4 | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 6 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 3 | 11% | 7% | 14% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 4 | 14% | 21% | 7% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 4 | 13% | 7% | 20% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 6 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 4 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 5 | 18% | 0% | 36% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 1 | 4% | 0% | 7% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 5 | 17% | 13% | 20% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 1 | 3% | 7% | 0% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 4 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 2 | 7% | 13% | 0% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 2 | 7% | 0% | 14% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 10 | 36% | 29% | 43% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 13 | 46% | 50% | 43% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 15 | 52% | 71% | 33% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 12 | 40% | 47% | 33% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 12 | 43% | 50% | 36% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 17 | 57% | 53% | 60% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 17 | 61% | 64% | 57% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 16 | 55% | 43% | 67% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 17 | 57% | 47% | 67% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 10 | 36% | 36% | 36% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 18 | 60% | 56% | 64% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 15 | 54% | 50% | 57% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 4 | 14% | 0% | 29% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 2 | 7% | 14% | 0% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 3 | 10% | 14% | 7% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 7% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 3 | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 3 | 10% | 0% | 20% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 1 | 4% | 7% | 0% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 8 | 29% | 21% | 36% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 9 | 32% | 36% | 29% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 10 | 34% | 50% | 20% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 6 | 20% | 13% | 27% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 7 | 25% | 36% | 14% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 9 | 30% | 33% | 27% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 9 | 32% | 36% | 29% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 6 | 21% | 14% | 27% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 10 | 33% | 20% | 47% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 6 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 8 | 27% | 25% | 29% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 12 | 43% | 43% | 43% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 18 | 64% | 64% | 64% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 24 | 86% | 93% | 79% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 21 | 72% | 71% | 73% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 19 | 63% | 73% | 53% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 16 | 57% | 57% | 57% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 24 | 80% | 67% | 93% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 21 | 75% | 86% | 64% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 22 | 76% | 64% | 87% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 23 | 77% | 80% | 73% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 18 | 64% | 50% | 79% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 24 | 80% | 75% | 86% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 20 | 71% | 86% | 57% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 21 | 75% | 71% | 79% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 25 | 86% | 79% | 93% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 24 | 80% | 80% | 80% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 25 | 89% | 93% | 86% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 28 | 93% | 87% | 100% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 26 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 25 | 86% | 79% | 93% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 26 | 87% | 93% | 80% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 22 | 79% | 79% | 79% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 26 | 87% | 75% | 100% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 23 | 82% | 100% | 64% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 27 | 96% | 93% | 100% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 27 | 96% | 100% | 93% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 28 | 97% | 100% | 93% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 25 | 83% | 87% | 80% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 26 | 93% | 93% | 93% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 29 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 28 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 28 | 97% | 93% | 100% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 30 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 24 | 86% | 86% | 86% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 28 | 93% | 88% | 100% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 26 | 93% | 100% | 86% |
You can check out how often Chattanooga Red Wolves and Inter Miami II matches in the USL League One go over or under a certain number of goals on this page. This is a handy tool to help predict how many goals they could potentially score when they meet in their upcoming match.
Here is an example of what we mean:
67% of Chattanooga Red Wolves’s matches in the USL League One have had more than 1.5 goals scored. And when we raise the line of total goals to 2.5, then the rate of matches that go over that number is 43%.
You can also check how many times the total has gone under. In Inter Miami II’s case, 21% of their matches have seen under 1.5 goals scored. And in terms of matches with under 2.5 goals, the rate is 36%.
You can also see whether Chattanooga Red Wolves and Inter Miami II matches go over or under a total number of goals when playing at home, away, or overall in USL League One.
The over/under goal analysis for Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Inter Miami II offers valuable insights into each club's playing styles as well as a reasonable estimation of goals we could see in the match.
However, predicting the number of goals in a match does not always go the way the math says it will. It’s important to always consider other factors as well in order to get the best chance of making an accurate prediction.