Season
2025/26
Country
Asia
Stadium
Shanghai Stadium
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Shanghai SIPG’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the AFC Champions League 2025/2026.
And on the other side of the ball, Shanghai SIPG’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their AFC Champions League matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Shanghai SIPG this season in the AFC Champions League:
You can follow the Shanghai SIPG’s card situation in ACL all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.