# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
18 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 19 | 1.12 |
2 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 16 | 4 | +12 | 35 | 1.94 |
3 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
18 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 28 | 1.56 |
4 |
![]() Stumptown Athletic |
18 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 26 | 1.44 |
5 |
![]() LA Force |
18 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 29 | 1.61 |
6 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 26 | 1.44 |
7 |
![]() San Diego 1904 |
18 | 1 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 10 | 0.59 |
8 |
![]() New Amsterdam |
18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 24 | 1.33 |
9 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 19 | 1.06 |
10 |
![]() Chicago House |
18 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 16 | 0.89 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 14 | 1.75 |
2 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 2 | +6 | 19 | 2.11 |
3 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 14 | 1.56 |
4 |
![]() Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 12 | 1.33 |
5 |
![]() LA Force |
9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 13 | 1.44 |
6 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 17 | 1.89 |
7 |
![]() San Diego 1904 |
9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 9 | 1 |
8 |
![]() New Amsterdam |
9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 10 | 1.11 |
9 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 1.22 |
10 |
![]() Chicago House |
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 9 | 1 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
9 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 5 | 0.56 |
2 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 2 | +6 | 16 | 1.78 |
3 |
![]() Michigan Stars |
9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | +2 | 14 | 1.56 |
4 |
![]() Stumptown Athletic |
9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 14 | 1.56 |
5 |
![]() LA Force |
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 16 | 1.78 |
6 |
![]() California Utd Strikers |
9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 1 |
7 |
![]() San Diego 1904 |
9 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 14 | -11 | 1 | 0.13 |
8 |
![]() New Amsterdam |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 14 | 1.56 |
9 |
![]() Maryland Bobcats |
9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 8 | 0.89 |
10 |
![]() Chicago House |
9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 7 | 0.78 |
It can be quite helpful to take a closer look at a team’s performance only in the first half of football games. Whether it’s the tactics of the coach or the comparison of their performance with other teams, they provide a glimpse into their overall play.
So if we only look at the first half of the match, we can see how San Diego 1904 has performed compared to other teams in the NISA in terms of their initial tactics over the first 45 minutes.
Below are some deeper insights on how San Diego 1904 has played in the 1st half of their games in NISA 2021/2022:
You can also check out San Diego 1904’s first half statistics for both home and away matches in the NISA 2021/2022.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.