Season
2025
Country
USA
Stadium
Phoenix Rising Soccer Complex
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
14 | 67% |
2 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
13 | 65% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
12 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
12 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
12 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
12 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
11 | 52% |
10 |
![]() Miami FC II |
11 | 52% |
11 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 48% |
13 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
9 | 45% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
9 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
9 | 43% |
17 |
![]() Lexington |
9 | 43% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
8 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
6 | 29% |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
6 | 29% |
22 |
![]() Rhode Island |
6 | 29% |
23 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
5 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
5 | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
9 | 90% |
2 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 78% |
3 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
7 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
6 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
7 | 64% |
7 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 64% |
8 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
5 | 63% |
9 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
5 | 56% |
11 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 55% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
6 | 55% |
13 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 55% |
14 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
5 | 45% |
16 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
5 | 45% |
17 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
5 | 42% |
18 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 42% |
19 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
3 | 30% |
21 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 30% |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
2 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
3 | 25% |
24 |
![]() Rhode Island |
2 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
7 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
6 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Miami FC II |
5 | 56% |
6 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 56% |
7 |
![]() New Mexico United |
6 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
5 | 45% |
10 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Lexington |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
13 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
3 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Rhode Island |
4 | 36% |
15 |
![]() San Antonio |
3 | 33% |
16 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
4 | 33% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
4 | 33% |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
4 | 33% |
19 |
![]() Orange County |
3 | 30% |
20 |
![]() Loudoun United |
3 | 27% |
21 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
3 | 25% |
22 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
2 | 22% |
23 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
2 | 20% |
24 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
16 | 76% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
15 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
15 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Loudoun United |
15 | 71% |
5 |
![]() Rhode Island |
15 | 71% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
14 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Lexington |
12 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
12 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
11 | 55% |
11 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
11 | 55% |
12 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 55% |
13 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
11 | 52% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Orange County |
9 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Miami FC II |
10 | 47% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
10 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
9 | 45% |
19 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
9 | 42% |
20 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
9 | 42% |
21 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
8 | 40% |
22 |
![]() New Mexico United |
7 | 36% |
23 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
7 | 35% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
7 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Rhode Island |
8 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
6 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
9 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
7 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
7 | 70% |
6 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
6 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
7 | 58% |
8 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
7 | 58% |
9 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
6 | 54% |
11 |
![]() Miami FC II |
6 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() San Antonio |
5 | 45% |
15 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
4 | 44% |
16 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
4 | 40% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
3 | 37% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
4 | 36% |
19 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
4 | 36% |
20 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
3 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
3 | 30% |
22 |
![]() New Mexico United |
2 | 25% |
23 |
![]() Orange County |
2 | 22% |
24 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
1 | 10% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
8 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 75% |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
8 | 72% |
6 |
![]() Orange County |
7 | 70% |
7 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
8 | 66% |
8 |
![]() San Antonio |
6 | 66% |
9 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
8 | 66% |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
8 | 66% |
11 |
![]() Rhode Island |
7 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
5 | 62% |
13 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
6 | 60% |
14 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
6 | 60% |
15 |
![]() Lexington |
6 | 60% |
16 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
6 | 54% |
17 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
6 | 50% |
18 |
![]() New Mexico United |
5 | 45% |
19 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
4 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Miami FC II |
4 | 44% |
21 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
4 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
3 | 33% |
23 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
3 | 30% |
24 |
![]() Louisville City |
3 | 30% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Phoenix Rising scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL Championship 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Phoenix Rising is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL Championship, Phoenix Rising has scored before the opponent in 52% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 47%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Phoenix Rising’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Phoenix Rising being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.