Football statistics for NY Cosmos
Team Info
Season
Country
Stadium
2020/21
USA
MCU Park
Competition
Over Under Goals
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 3 | 43% | 33% | 50% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 10 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 9 | 41% | 36% | 45% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 7 | 39% | 40% | 38% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 2 | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 8 | 42% | 13% | 64% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 4 | 57% | 80% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 8 | 50% | 63% | 38% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 6 | 55% | 50% | 57% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 11 | 61% | 63% | 60% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 6 | 55% | 80% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 5 | 71% | 67% | 75% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 18 | 90% | 83% | 100% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 18 | 82% | 82% | 82% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 16 | 89% | 90% | 88% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 9 | 82% | 83% | 80% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 18 | 95% | 88% | 100% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 14 | 88% | 100% | 75% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 17 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 9 | 82% | 100% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 5 | 71% | 67% | 75% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 16 | 80% | 75% | 88% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 13 | 59% | 55% | 64% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 13 | 72% | 80% | 63% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 5 | 45% | 50% | 40% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 14 | 74% | 63% | 82% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 6 | 86% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 13 | 81% | 88% | 75% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 8 | 73% | 75% | 71% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 13 | 72% | 63% | 80% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 8 | 73% | 100% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 1 | 14% | 0% | 25% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 3 | 15% | 17% | 13% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 2 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 2 | 11% | 20% | 0% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 1 | 9% | 17% | 0% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 4 | 21% | 0% | 36% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 3 | 19% | 38% | 0% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 5 | 45% | 50% | 43% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 5 | 28% | 25% | 30% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 3 | 27% | 20% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 3 | 15% | 17% | 13% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 1 | 5% | 9% | 0% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 4 | 21% | 0% | 36% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 2 | 13% | 25% | 0% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 1 | 9% | 25% | 0% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 3 | 17% | 13% | 20% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 1 | 9% | 0% | 17% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 1 | 5% | 9% | 0% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 1 | 6% | 0% | 10% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 4 | 57% | 67% | 50% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 10 | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 13 | 59% | 64% | 55% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 11 | 61% | 60% | 63% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 9 | 82% | 83% | 80% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 11 | 58% | 88% | 36% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 3 | 43% | 20% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 8 | 50% | 38% | 63% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 5 | 45% | 50% | 43% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 7 | 39% | 38% | 40% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 5 | 45% | 20% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 2 | 29% | 33% | 25% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 2 | 10% | 17% | 0% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 4 | 18% | 18% | 18% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 2 | 11% | 10% | 13% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 2 | 18% | 17% | 20% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 1 | 5% | 13% | 0% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 2 | 13% | 0% | 25% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 1 | 6% | 13% | 0% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 2 | 18% | 0% | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 2 | 29% | 33% | 25% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 4 | 20% | 25% | 13% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 9 | 41% | 45% | 36% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 5 | 28% | 20% | 38% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 6 | 55% | 50% | 60% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 5 | 26% | 38% | 18% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 1 | 14% | 20% | 0% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 3 | 19% | 13% | 25% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 3 | 27% | 25% | 29% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 5 | 28% | 38% | 20% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 3 | 27% | 0% | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 6 | 86% | 100% | 75% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 17 | 85% | 83% | 88% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 20 | 91% | 91% | 91% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 16 | 89% | 80% | 100% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 10 | 91% | 83% | 100% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 15 | 79% | 100% | 64% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 6 | 86% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 13 | 81% | 63% | 100% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 6 | 55% | 50% | 57% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 13 | 72% | 75% | 70% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 8 | 73% | 80% | 67% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 17 | 85% | 83% | 88% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 21 | 95% | 91% | 100% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 18 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 15 | 79% | 100% | 64% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 6 | 86% | 80% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 14 | 88% | 75% | 100% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 10 | 91% | 75% | 100% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 15 | 83% | 88% | 80% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 10 | 91% | 100% | 83% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
NY Cosmos |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 |
Chattanooga FC |
20 | 20 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 3 |
Detroit City FC |
22 | 21 | 95% | 91% | 100% |
| 4 |
Michigan Stars |
18 | 18 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 5 |
Stumptown Athletic |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 6 |
LA Force |
19 | 19 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 7 |
Oakland Roots |
7 | 7 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 8 |
California Utd Strikers |
16 | 16 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 9 |
San Diego 1904 |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 10 |
New Amsterdam |
18 | 17 | 94% | 100% | 90% |
| 11 |
Maryland Bobcats |
11 | 11 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Average goals scored and conceded: NY Cosmos
Knowing NY Cosmos’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the NISA 2020/2021 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the NY Cosmos’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
- 43% of NY Cosmos games in the league have had 3 or more goals (NY Cosmos and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 57%.
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in NISA.
All of this information can help determine how NY Cosmos’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.