Season
Country
Stadium
2015/16
Belgium
Gemeentelijk Sportcentrum
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() AS Eupen |
32 | 69% | 56% | 34% |
2 |
![]() Royal Antwerp FC |
32 | 69% | 50% | 13% |
3 |
![]() Cercle Brugge |
32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
4 |
![]() SV Roeselare |
32 | 59% | 41% | 28% |
5 |
![]() AFC Tubize |
32 | 66% | 53% | 28% |
6 |
![]() Lierse SK |
32 | 66% | 38% | 22% |
7 |
![]() Union Saint-Gilloise |
32 | 78% | 59% | 22% |
8 |
![]() Lommel United |
32 | 59% | 38% | 16% |
9 |
![]() ASV Geel |
32 | 53% | 31% | 22% |
10 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
32 | 69% | 47% | 31% |
11 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
32 | 84% | 69% | 34% |
12 |
![]() KSK Heist |
32 | 84% | 53% | 38% |
13 |
![]() KMSK Deinze |
32 | 63% | 38% | 31% |
14 |
![]() White Star Bruxelles |
32 | 81% | 59% | 47% |
15 |
![]() KVV Coxyde |
32 | 44% | 25% | 9% |
16 |
![]() Excelsior Virton |
32 | 66% | 47% | 38% |
17 |
![]() Dessel Sport |
32 | 66% | 50% | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() AS Eupen |
32 | 69% | 44% | 19% |
2 |
![]() Royal Antwerp FC |
32 | 56% | 31% | 3% |
3 |
![]() Cercle Brugge |
32 | 72% | 34% | 9% |
4 |
![]() SV Roeselare |
32 | 53% | 31% | 9% |
5 |
![]() AFC Tubize |
32 | 66% | 44% | 19% |
6 |
![]() Lierse SK |
32 | 44% | 28% | 9% |
7 |
![]() Union Saint-Gilloise |
32 | 69% | 38% | 13% |
8 |
![]() Lommel United |
32 | 59% | 22% | 13% |
9 |
![]() ASV Geel |
32 | 66% | 41% | 9% |
10 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
32 | 69% | 53% | 22% |
11 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
32 | 94% | 63% | 28% |
12 |
![]() KSK Heist |
32 | 81% | 50% | 31% |
13 |
![]() KMSK Deinze |
32 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
14 |
![]() White Star Bruxelles |
32 | 75% | 47% | 22% |
15 |
![]() KVV Coxyde |
32 | 50% | 34% | 16% |
16 |
![]() Excelsior Virton |
32 | 66% | 44% | 16% |
17 |
![]() Dessel Sport |
32 | 69% | 41% | 16% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() AS Eupen |
32 | 72% | 47% | 16% |
2 |
![]() Royal Antwerp FC |
32 | 88% | 47% | 13% |
3 |
![]() Cercle Brugge |
32 | 69% | 47% | 16% |
4 |
![]() SV Roeselare |
32 | 63% | 44% | 16% |
5 |
![]() AFC Tubize |
32 | 59% | 38% | 22% |
6 |
![]() Lierse SK |
32 | 81% | 50% | 25% |
7 |
![]() Union Saint-Gilloise |
32 | 78% | 53% | 34% |
8 |
![]() Lommel United |
32 | 66% | 31% | 16% |
9 |
![]() ASV Geel |
32 | 56% | 25% | 6% |
10 |
![]() Patro Eisden |
32 | 53% | 44% | 19% |
11 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
32 | 63% | 34% | 9% |
12 |
![]() KSK Heist |
32 | 69% | 34% | 3% |
13 |
![]() KMSK Deinze |
32 | 59% | 31% | 13% |
14 |
![]() White Star Bruxelles |
32 | 78% | 63% | 25% |
15 |
![]() KVV Coxyde |
32 | 47% | 13% | 3% |
16 |
![]() Excelsior Virton |
32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
17 |
![]() Dessel Sport |
32 | 63% | 47% | 22% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of KSK Heist’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 50% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2015/2016.
And on the other side of the ball, KSK Heist’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 69% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for KSK Heist this season in the First Division B:
You can follow the KSK Heist’s card situation in First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.