# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada |
14 | 57% | 50% | 36% |
2 |
![]() Miami FC |
17 | 29% | 24% | 24% |
3 |
![]() NY Cosmos |
14 | 29% | 14% | 14% |
4 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
15 | 13% | 13% | 13% |
5 |
![]() FC Motown |
16 | 13% | 6% | 6% |
6 |
![]() El Farolito |
13 | 23% | 8% | 8% |
7 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() West Chester United |
12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Duluth FC |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Ann Arbor |
14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
11 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
13 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Academica |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Orange County FC |
14 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
14 |
![]() FC Baltimore |
12 | 25% | 17% | 8% |
15 |
![]() Philadelphia Lone Star |
11 | 18% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Midland-Odessa |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
17 |
![]() FCM Portland |
16 | 25% | 25% | 13% |
18 |
![]() Little Rock Rangers |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() FC Wichita |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
20 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
16 | 31% | 19% | 13% |
21 |
![]() Houston Regals SCA |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Elm City Express |
10 | 30% | 20% | 20% |
23 |
![]() Emerald Force |
14 | 14% | 14% | 14% |
24 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Riverside Coras |
9 | 33% | 11% | 11% |
26 |
![]() FC Arizona |
9 | 33% | 11% | 11% |
27 |
![]() Oxnard Guerreros |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
28 |
![]() Greater Lowell United |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Binghamton Thunder |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() OSA |
12 | 25% | 17% | 17% |
31 |
![]() Miami United FC |
13 | 54% | 54% | 54% |
32 |
![]() Boca Raton |
12 | 42% | 33% | 17% |
33 |
![]() Charlottesville Alliance |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Northern Virginia United |
11 | 18% | 9% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Tulsa Athletic |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
36 |
![]() Grand Rapids |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
37 |
![]() Virginia Legacy |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Houston Dutch Lions FC |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Temecula |
9 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
40 |
![]() Kitsap Pumas 09 |
12 | 33% | 33% | 17% |
41 |
![]() Rhode Island Reds FC |
9 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() Hartford City FC |
11 | 27% | 18% | 18% |
43 |
![]() Fort Pitt FC Regiment |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 |
![]() Med City FC |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
45 |
![]() Spokane Shadow |
13 | 23% | 15% | 0% |
46 |
![]() Torch FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() VSLT |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
48 |
![]() Aris |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 |
![]() FC Golden State |
12 | 17% | 17% | 17% |
50 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada |
14 | 57% | 21% | 21% |
2 |
![]() Miami FC |
17 | 29% | 18% | 12% |
3 |
![]() NY Cosmos |
14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
4 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
15 | 27% | 7% | 7% |
5 |
![]() FC Motown |
16 | 19% | 6% | 6% |
6 |
![]() El Farolito |
13 | 23% | 8% | 8% |
7 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() West Chester United |
12 | 17% | 8% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Duluth FC |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Ann Arbor |
14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
11 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
13 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Academica |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Orange County FC |
14 | 21% | 21% | 14% |
14 |
![]() FC Baltimore |
12 | 25% | 17% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Philadelphia Lone Star |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
16 |
![]() Midland-Odessa |
11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
17 |
![]() FCM Portland |
16 | 19% | 13% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Little Rock Rangers |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() FC Wichita |
12 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
16 | 38% | 13% | 6% |
21 |
![]() Houston Regals SCA |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Elm City Express |
10 | 40% | 40% | 10% |
23 |
![]() Emerald Force |
14 | 29% | 7% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
10 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Riverside Coras |
9 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() FC Arizona |
9 | 33% | 11% | 11% |
27 |
![]() Oxnard Guerreros |
10 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
28 |
![]() Greater Lowell United |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Binghamton Thunder |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() OSA |
12 | 33% | 25% | 17% |
31 |
![]() Miami United FC |
13 | 62% | 54% | 38% |
32 |
![]() Boca Raton |
12 | 33% | 33% | 8% |
33 |
![]() Charlottesville Alliance |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Northern Virginia United |
11 | 18% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Tulsa Athletic |
11 | 18% | 9% | 9% |
36 |
![]() Grand Rapids |
13 | 8% | 0% | 0% |
37 |
![]() Virginia Legacy |
10 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Houston Dutch Lions FC |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Temecula |
9 | 11% | 11% | 11% |
40 |
![]() Kitsap Pumas 09 |
12 | 33% | 33% | 25% |
41 |
![]() Rhode Island Reds FC |
9 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() Hartford City FC |
11 | 18% | 18% | 9% |
43 |
![]() Fort Pitt FC Regiment |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 |
![]() Med City FC |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
45 |
![]() Spokane Shadow |
13 | 15% | 8% | 8% |
46 |
![]() Torch FC |
10 | 20% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() VSLT |
14 | 7% | 7% | 0% |
48 |
![]() Aris |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 |
![]() FC Golden State |
12 | 17% | 8% | 0% |
50 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Jacksonville Armada |
14 | 57% | 43% | 36% |
2 |
![]() Miami FC |
17 | 41% | 29% | 24% |
3 |
![]() NY Cosmos |
14 | 29% | 29% | 14% |
4 |
![]() New Orleans Jesters |
15 | 13% | 7% | 7% |
5 |
![]() FC Motown |
16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
6 |
![]() El Farolito |
13 | 23% | 15% | 8% |
7 |
![]() Laredo Heat |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() West Chester United |
12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Duluth FC |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Ann Arbor |
14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
11 |
![]() Erie Commodores |
13 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Academica |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Orange County FC |
14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
14 |
![]() FC Baltimore |
12 | 25% | 8% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Philadelphia Lone Star |
11 | 18% | 9% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Midland-Odessa |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() FCM Portland |
16 | 25% | 25% | 19% |
18 |
![]() Little Rock Rangers |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() FC Wichita |
12 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
20 |
![]() Chattanooga FC |
16 | 38% | 19% | 13% |
21 |
![]() Houston Regals SCA |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() Elm City Express |
10 | 20% | 20% | 20% |
23 |
![]() Emerald Force |
14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
24 |
![]() Napa Valley 1839 FC |
10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Riverside Coras |
9 | 33% | 11% | 11% |
26 |
![]() FC Arizona |
9 | 33% | 11% | 11% |
27 |
![]() Oxnard Guerreros |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() Greater Lowell United |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() Binghamton Thunder |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() OSA |
12 | 17% | 8% | 8% |
31 |
![]() Miami United FC |
13 | 62% | 46% | 31% |
32 |
![]() Boca Raton |
12 | 50% | 25% | 8% |
33 |
![]() Charlottesville Alliance |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Northern Virginia United |
11 | 27% | 9% | 0% |
35 |
![]() Tulsa Athletic |
11 | 9% | 0% | 0% |
36 |
![]() Grand Rapids |
13 | 8% | 8% | 8% |
37 |
![]() Virginia Legacy |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 |
![]() Houston Dutch Lions FC |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 |
![]() Temecula |
9 | 11% | 11% | 0% |
40 |
![]() Kitsap Pumas 09 |
12 | 33% | 25% | 8% |
41 |
![]() Rhode Island Reds FC |
9 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 |
![]() Hartford City FC |
11 | 27% | 27% | 9% |
43 |
![]() Fort Pitt FC Regiment |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 |
![]() Med City FC |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
45 |
![]() Spokane Shadow |
13 | 15% | 15% | 8% |
46 |
![]() Torch FC |
10 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 |
![]() VSLT |
14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
48 |
![]() Aris |
14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 |
![]() FC Golden State |
12 | 25% | 25% | 17% |
50 |
![]() Minneapolis City SC |
14 | 21% | 7% | 7% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Binghamton Thunder’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the NPSL 2018.
And on the other side of the ball, Binghamton Thunder’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their NPSL matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Binghamton Thunder this season in the NPSL:
You can follow the Binghamton Thunder’s card situation in NPSL all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.