Football statistics for FK Bodo/Glimt
Team Info
Season
2025/26
Country
Europe
Stadium
Aspmyra Stadion
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Celtic |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Rangers |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 3 |
Copenhagen |
5 | 1 | 20% |
| 4 |
The New Saints |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 5 |
Red Star Belgrade |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 6 |
Qarabag |
5 | 2 | 40% |
| 7 |
Viktoria Plzeň |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 8 |
Benfica |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Basel |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 |
Žalgiris |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Zrinjski |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 12 |
Club Brugge |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 13 |
FCSB |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 14 |
Salzburg |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 15 |
Lincoln Red Imps |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 16 |
Fenerbahçe |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 17 |
Ludogorets |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 18 |
Olimpija |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 19 |
Ferencváros |
5 | 3 | 60% |
| 20 |
Dynamo Kyiv |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
FK Bodo/Glimt |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 22 |
Brann |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 23 |
Feyenoord |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 24 |
KuPS |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Nice |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Sturm Graz |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 27 |
Malmö FF |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 28 |
Dinamo Minsk |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 29 |
Servette |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 30 |
Maccabi Tel Aviv |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 31 |
Panathinaikos |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 32 |
Lech Poznań |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 33 |
Milsami |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Tallinna FC Levadia |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Slovan Bratislava |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 36 |
Rigas FS |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 37 |
Linfield |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 38 |
Víkingur |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 39 |
Budućnost |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 40 |
Rijeka |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 41 |
Noah |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 42 |
Egnatia Rrogozhinë |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Shelbourne |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 44 |
Hamrun Spartans |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 46 |
Paphos |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 47 |
Breidablik |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 48 |
Differdange 03 |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 49 |
Kairat |
8 | 1 | 13% |
| 50 |
Shkendija |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Celtic |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Rangers |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 3 |
Copenhagen |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
The New Saints |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Red Star Belgrade |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 6 |
Qarabag |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 7 |
Viktoria Plzeň |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 |
Benfica |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Basel |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 |
Žalgiris |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Zrinjski |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 12 |
Club Brugge |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 13 |
FCSB |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 14 |
Salzburg |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 15 |
Lincoln Red Imps |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 16 |
Fenerbahçe |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 17 |
Ludogorets |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Olimpija |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 19 |
Ferencváros |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 20 |
Dynamo Kyiv |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
FK Bodo/Glimt |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Brann |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 23 |
Feyenoord |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
KuPS |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Nice |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Sturm Graz |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 27 |
Malmö FF |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 28 |
Dinamo Minsk |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 29 |
Servette |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 30 |
Maccabi Tel Aviv |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
Panathinaikos |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 32 |
Lech Poznań |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 33 |
Milsami |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Tallinna FC Levadia |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Slovan Bratislava |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Rigas FS |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 37 |
Linfield |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 38 |
Víkingur |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 39 |
Budućnost |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 40 |
Rijeka |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Noah |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 42 |
Egnatia Rrogozhinë |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Shelbourne |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 44 |
Hamrun Spartans |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 46 |
Paphos |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 47 |
Breidablik |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Differdange 03 |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 49 |
Kairat |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
Shkendija |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Celtic |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Rangers |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 3 |
Copenhagen |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 4 |
The New Saints |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 5 |
Red Star Belgrade |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 6 |
Qarabag |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 7 |
Viktoria Plzeň |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 |
Benfica |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Basel |
0 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
Žalgiris |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 11 |
Zrinjski |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 12 |
Club Brugge |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 13 |
FCSB |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 14 |
Salzburg |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 15 |
Lincoln Red Imps |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 16 |
Fenerbahçe |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 17 |
Ludogorets |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Olimpija |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Ferencváros |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 20 |
Dynamo Kyiv |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
FK Bodo/Glimt |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 22 |
Brann |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 23 |
Feyenoord |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
KuPS |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Nice |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
Sturm Graz |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 27 |
Malmö FF |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 28 |
Dinamo Minsk |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Servette |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Maccabi Tel Aviv |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 31 |
Panathinaikos |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 32 |
Lech Poznań |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 33 |
Milsami |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Tallinna FC Levadia |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Slovan Bratislava |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 36 |
Rigas FS |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 37 |
Linfield |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Víkingur |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 39 |
Budućnost |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Rijeka |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 41 |
Noah |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 42 |
Egnatia Rrogozhinë |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
Shelbourne |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 44 |
Hamrun Spartans |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 46 |
Paphos |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 47 |
Breidablik |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
Differdange 03 |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 49 |
Kairat |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 50 |
Shkendija |
3 | 2 | 67% |
FK Bodo/Glimt BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in FK Bodo/Glimt’s case, their BTTS statistics in the UEFA Champions League 2025/2026 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on FK Bodo/Glimt in the competition:
- In 2 matches to date, FK Bodo/Glimt has scored and conceded in the same game 1 times
- In terms of percentage, FK Bodo/Glimt has had both teams score in 50% of their matches in UEFA Champions League.
You can also see FK Bodo/Glimt’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.