Season
2025
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
22 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 45 | 18 | +27 | 51 | 2.32 | |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
22 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 45 | 23 | +22 | 47 | 2.14 | |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
22 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 37 | 25 | +12 | 42 | 1.91 | |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
21 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 31 | 17 | +14 | 34 | 1.62 | |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 34 | +1 | 34 | 1.55 | |
6 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 33 | 30 | +3 | 33 | 1.57 | |
7 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
21 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 36 | 30 | +6 | 32 | 1.52 | |
8 |
![]() San Antonio |
21 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 26 | 27 | -1 | 30 | 1.43 | |
9 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
21 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 32 | 25 | +7 | 29 | 1.38 | |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 29 | 1.32 | |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 38 | 40 | -2 | 29 | 1.32 | |
12 |
![]() Orange County |
20 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 32 | 29 | +3 | 28 | 1.40 | |
13 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 28 | 1.27 | |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 23 | 28 | -5 | 28 | 1.27 | |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
21 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 27 | 29 | -2 | 27 | 1.29 | |
16 |
![]() New Mexico United |
20 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 26 | 30 | -4 | 27 | 1.35 | |
17 |
![]() Rhode Island |
22 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 23 | -7 | 24 | 1.09 | |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
23 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 23 | 30 | -7 | 24 | 1.04 | |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 25 | 32 | -7 | 24 | 1.14 | |
20 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
21 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 33 | 40 | -7 | 23 | 1.10 | |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 18 | 39 | -21 | 23 | 1.05 | |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
21 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 24 | 32 | -8 | 21 | 1.00 | |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
22 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 28 | 37 | -9 | 21 | 0.95 | |
24 |
![]() Miami FC II |
22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 22 | 37 | -15 | 20 | 0.91 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 7 | +16 | 27 | 2.45 | |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 8 | +19 | 27 | 2.70 | |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 13 | +7 | 23 | 2.09 | |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 18 | 1.64 | |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 14 | +8 | 23 | 2.09 | |
6 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 20 | 1.82 | |
7 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 24 | 15 | +9 | 18 | 1.80 | |
8 |
![]() San Antonio |
11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 13 | +2 | 16 | 1.45 | |
9 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 8 | +9 | 18 | 1.50 | |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 16 | 1.60 | |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 17 | +4 | 13 | 1.30 | |
12 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 25 | 18 | +7 | 20 | 2.00 | |
13 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 21 | 1.91 | |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 19 | 1.73 | |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 14 | 1.56 | |
16 |
![]() New Mexico United |
9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 14 | 1.56 | |
17 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 14 | 1.27 | |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 17 | 1.70 | |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 11 | 1.00 | |
20 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 23 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 | |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 17 | 1.31 | |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 11 | 1.22 | |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 10 | 0.83 | |
24 |
![]() Miami FC II |
12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 12 | 1.00 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG | Last 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Louisville City |
11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 11 | +11 | 24 | 2.18 | |
2 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 15 | +3 | 20 | 1.67 | |
3 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 | 12 | +5 | 19 | 1.73 | |
4 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 16 | 1.60 | |
5 |
![]() Loudoun United |
11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 11 | 1.00 | |
6 |
![]() North Carolina FC |
10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 13 | 1.30 | |
7 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 14 | 1.27 | |
8 |
![]() San Antonio |
10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 14 | 1.40 | |
9 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 17 | -2 | 11 | 1.22 | |
10 |
![]() Detroit City FC |
12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 13 | 1.08 | |
11 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 17 | 23 | -6 | 16 | 1.33 | |
12 |
![]() Orange County |
10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 8 | 0.80 | |
13 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
11 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 7 | 0.64 | |
14 |
![]() Lexington |
11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 9 | 0.82 | |
15 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 13 | 1.08 | |
16 |
![]() New Mexico United |
11 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 13 | 1.18 | |
17 |
![]() Rhode Island |
11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 10 | 0.91 | |
18 |
![]() Monterey Bay |
13 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 7 | 0.54 | |
19 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 13 | 1.30 | |
20 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 8 | 0.89 | |
21 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 24 | -18 | 6 | 0.67 | |
22 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 10 | 0.83 | |
23 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 22 | -3 | 11 | 1.10 | |
24 |
![]() Miami FC II |
10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 8 | 0.80 |
Colorado Springs currently ranks 15th in the USL Championship among all 24 clubs competing in the championship - regardless of the stages of the tournament.
In 21 matches played thus far, Colorado Springs has a record of 7 wins, 6 draws, and 8 defeats, and an average of 1.29 points per match.
These statistics are crucial in accurately measuring their overall performance during the championship. They can help give a better idea of whether the team is a true title contender or if they are not quite capable of competing with the very top teams for the championship.
Meanwhile, here is more information about Colorado Springs’s ongoing campaign in the USL Championship:
These five players currently lead the Colorado Springs standings for most goals in the season:
Topping the Colorado Springs table for most assists are these five players:
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.