Season
Country
2025
USA
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
13 | 65% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
13 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
13 | 62% |
4 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
12 | 55% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
11 | 52% |
6 |
![]() Naples |
11 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
9 | 45% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
10 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
8 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
7 | 37% |
12 |
![]() AV Alta |
8 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
7 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 32% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
8 | 89% |
2 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 58% |
6 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 55% |
7 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 46% |
11 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() AV Alta |
5 | 45% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 40% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 70% |
2 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 55% |
4 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 45% |
5 |
![]() Westchester SC |
5 | 45% |
6 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 45% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 42% |
8 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
4 | 36% |
9 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 27% |
10 |
![]() AV Alta |
3 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
3 | 27% |
12 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 22% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
2 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
15 | 68% |
2 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
14 | 66% |
3 |
![]() AV Alta |
14 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
12 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
12 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
13 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
11 | 55% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
12 | 54% |
9 |
![]() Naples |
11 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
10 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
10 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
8 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 35% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 35% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 60% |
2 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 54% |
3 |
![]() AV Alta |
6 | 54% |
4 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 54% |
5 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
5 | 45% |
10 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 27% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
1 | 11% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
8 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() AV Alta |
8 | 72% |
6 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
8 | 72% |
7 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
7 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
7 | 58% |
9 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 54% |
11 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
3 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 30% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Chattanooga Red Wolves scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the USL League One 2025.
Through this stat, we can see whether Chattanooga Red Wolves is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the USL League One, Chattanooga Red Wolves has scored before the opponent in 62% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 38%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Chattanooga Red Wolves’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Chattanooga Red Wolves being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.