Season
2017
Country
China
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 10% | 7% | 7% |
2 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 13% | 10% | 3% |
3 |
![]() Beijing Renhe |
30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 10% | 7% | 7% |
5 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
6 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
30 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 17% | 10% | 7% |
8 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
9 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
10 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
11 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
12 |
![]() Yunnan Lijiang |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
13 |
![]() Baoding Yingli Yitong |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
14 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
16 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
30 | 10% | 7% | 7% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 10% | 10% | 10% |
2 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 10% | 3% | 3% |
3 |
![]() Beijing Renhe |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
6 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 17% | 17% | 7% |
8 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
30 | 7% | 3% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
11 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 13% | 3% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Yunnan Lijiang |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
13 |
![]() Baoding Yingli Yitong |
30 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 10% | 10% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
2 |
![]() Hangzhou |
30 | 13% | 7% | 3% |
3 |
![]() Beijing Renhe |
30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai Shenxin |
30 | 13% | 13% | 7% |
5 |
![]() Zhejiang Yiteng |
30 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
30 | 7% | 7% | 3% |
7 |
![]() Shenzhen |
30 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
8 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
30 | 7% | 3% | 3% |
9 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Xinjiang Tianshan |
30 | 10% | 3% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Beijing BG |
30 | 10% | 3% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Yunnan Lijiang |
30 | 3% | 3% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Baoding Yingli Yitong |
30 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
14 |
![]() Nei Mongol Zhongyou |
30 | 10% | 7% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Qingdao Huanghai |
30 | 10% | 10% | 7% |
16 |
![]() Dalian Transcendence |
30 | 10% | 7% | 3% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Baoding Yingli Yitong’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the China League One 2017.
And on the other side of the ball, Baoding Yingli Yitong’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 3% of their China League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Baoding Yingli Yitong this season in the China League One:
You can follow the Baoding Yingli Yitong’s card situation in China League One all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.