Season
2021
Country
USA
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
32 | 17 | 53% |
2 |
![]() Miami FC |
33 | 19 | 58% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
36 | 16 | 44% |
4 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
33 | 21 | 64% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
32 | 24 | 75% |
6 |
![]() Atlanta United II |
32 | 19 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Tacoma Defiance |
32 | 18 | 56% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
33 | 22 | 67% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
32 | 17 | 53% |
10 |
![]() OKC Energy |
32 | 17 | 53% |
11 |
![]() LA Galaxy II |
32 | 17 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
32 | 19 | 59% |
13 |
![]() Rio Grande Valley |
34 | 24 | 71% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
32 | 21 | 66% |
15 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
34 | 17 | 50% |
16 |
![]() New York RB II |
32 | 20 | 63% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
33 | 24 | 73% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
35 | 23 | 66% |
19 |
![]() Real Monarchs |
32 | 16 | 50% |
20 |
![]() Orange County |
36 | 18 | 50% |
21 |
![]() San Antonio |
35 | 22 | 63% |
22 |
![]() Sporting KC II |
32 | 17 | 53% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
32 | 20 | 63% |
24 |
![]() Memphis 901 |
33 | 19 | 58% |
25 |
![]() Loudoun United |
32 | 18 | 56% |
26 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
32 | 18 | 56% |
27 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
33 | 18 | 55% |
28 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
33 | 18 | 55% |
29 |
![]() Austin Bold |
32 | 17 | 53% |
30 |
![]() San Diego Loyal |
33 | 23 | 70% |
31 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
34 | 15 | 44% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
16 | 7 | 44% |
2 |
![]() Miami FC |
16 | 10 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
20 | 10 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
17 | 11 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 12 | 75% |
6 |
![]() Atlanta United II |
16 | 10 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 10 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
16 | 10 | 63% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 7 | 44% |
10 |
![]() OKC Energy |
16 | 7 | 44% |
11 |
![]() LA Galaxy II |
16 | 8 | 50% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 10 | 63% |
13 |
![]() Rio Grande Valley |
16 | 11 | 69% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
16 | 9 | 56% |
15 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
17 | 9 | 53% |
16 |
![]() New York RB II |
16 | 10 | 63% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
16 | 12 | 75% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
18 | 11 | 61% |
19 |
![]() Real Monarchs |
16 | 9 | 56% |
20 |
![]() Orange County |
19 | 8 | 42% |
21 |
![]() San Antonio |
18 | 11 | 61% |
22 |
![]() Sporting KC II |
16 | 9 | 56% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 11 | 69% |
24 |
![]() Memphis 901 |
16 | 9 | 56% |
25 |
![]() Loudoun United |
16 | 10 | 63% |
26 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
16 | 10 | 63% |
27 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
16 | 10 | 63% |
28 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
17 | 7 | 41% |
29 |
![]() Austin Bold |
16 | 9 | 56% |
30 |
![]() San Diego Loyal |
16 | 12 | 75% |
31 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
16 | 8 | 50% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Indy Eleven |
16 | 10 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Miami FC |
17 | 9 | 53% |
3 |
![]() Tampa Bay Rowdies |
16 | 6 | 38% |
4 |
![]() Phoenix Rising |
16 | 10 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Las Vegas Lights |
16 | 12 | 75% |
6 |
![]() Atlanta United II |
16 | 9 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Tacoma Defiance |
16 | 8 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Tulsa Roughnecks |
17 | 12 | 71% |
9 |
![]() Pittsburgh Riverhounds |
16 | 10 | 63% |
10 |
![]() OKC Energy |
16 | 10 | 63% |
11 |
![]() LA Galaxy II |
16 | 9 | 56% |
12 |
![]() Sacramento Republic |
16 | 9 | 56% |
13 |
![]() Rio Grande Valley |
18 | 13 | 72% |
14 |
![]() Charleston Battery |
16 | 12 | 75% |
15 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
17 | 8 | 47% |
16 |
![]() New York RB II |
16 | 10 | 63% |
17 |
![]() Colorado Springs |
17 | 12 | 71% |
18 |
![]() Louisville City |
17 | 12 | 71% |
19 |
![]() Real Monarchs |
16 | 7 | 44% |
20 |
![]() Orange County |
17 | 10 | 59% |
21 |
![]() San Antonio |
17 | 11 | 65% |
22 |
![]() Sporting KC II |
16 | 8 | 50% |
23 |
![]() New Mexico United |
16 | 9 | 56% |
24 |
![]() Memphis 901 |
17 | 10 | 59% |
25 |
![]() Loudoun United |
16 | 8 | 50% |
26 |
![]() Hartford Athletic |
16 | 8 | 50% |
27 |
![]() Birmingham Legion |
17 | 8 | 47% |
28 |
![]() El Paso Locomotive |
16 | 11 | 69% |
29 |
![]() Austin Bold |
16 | 8 | 50% |
30 |
![]() San Diego Loyal |
17 | 11 | 65% |
31 |
![]() Oakland Roots |
18 | 7 | 39% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Austin Bold’s case, their BTTS statistics in the USL Championship 2021 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Austin Bold in the competition:
You can also see Austin Bold’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.