Season
2022
Country
Brazil
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Paysandu |
14 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
14 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Tapajós |
10 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Bragantino PA |
10 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Caeté |
10 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Remo |
14 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Castanhal |
10 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Independente PA |
8 | 38% |
9 |
![]() Paragominas |
8 | 38% |
10 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
14 | 29% |
11 |
![]() Amazônia PA |
8 | 25% |
12 |
![]() Itupiranga |
8 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Paysandu |
7 | 86% |
2 |
![]() Bragantino PA |
5 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Caeté |
5 | 60% |
4 |
![]() Tapajós |
5 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Castanhal |
5 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Remo |
7 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
7 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Paragominas |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Independente PA |
4 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Amazônia PA |
4 | 25% |
11 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
7 | 14% |
12 |
![]() Itupiranga |
4 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
7 | 57% |
2 |
![]() Paysandu |
7 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
7 | 43% |
4 |
![]() Remo |
7 | 43% |
5 |
![]() Tapajós |
5 | 40% |
6 |
![]() Caeté |
5 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Paragominas |
4 | 25% |
8 |
![]() Itupiranga |
4 | 25% |
9 |
![]() Amazônia PA |
4 | 25% |
10 |
![]() Independente PA |
4 | 25% |
11 |
![]() Bragantino PA |
5 | 20% |
12 |
![]() Castanhal |
5 | 20% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Itupiranga |
8 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Amazônia PA |
8 | 63% |
3 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
14 | 57% |
4 |
![]() Independente PA |
8 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Bragantino PA |
10 | 50% |
6 |
![]() Caeté |
10 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Castanhal |
10 | 40% |
8 |
![]() Tapajós |
10 | 40% |
9 |
![]() Paragominas |
8 | 38% |
10 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
14 | 36% |
11 |
![]() Remo |
14 | 36% |
12 |
![]() Paysandu |
14 | 21% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Itupiranga |
4 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
7 | 57% |
3 |
![]() Independente PA |
4 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Amazônia PA |
4 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
7 | 43% |
6 |
![]() Castanhal |
5 | 40% |
7 |
![]() Remo |
7 | 29% |
8 |
![]() Paragominas |
4 | 25% |
9 |
![]() Bragantino PA |
5 | 20% |
10 |
![]() Tapajós |
5 | 20% |
11 |
![]() Caeté |
5 | 20% |
12 |
![]() Paysandu |
7 | 14% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Bragantino PA |
5 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Itupiranga |
4 | 75% |
3 |
![]() Amazônia PA |
4 | 75% |
4 |
![]() Caeté |
5 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Tapajós |
5 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Águia de Marabá |
7 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Paragominas |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Independente PA |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Remo |
7 | 43% |
10 |
![]() Castanhal |
5 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Tuna Luso |
7 | 29% |
12 |
![]() Paysandu |
7 | 29% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Amazônia PA scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the Paraense 2022.
Through this stat, we can see whether Amazônia PA is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the Paraense, Amazônia PA has scored before the opponent in 25% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 63%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Amazônia PA’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Amazônia PA being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.