1st Half
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
25 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 28 | 9 | +19 | 45 | 1.96 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
23 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 31 | 1.48 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
26 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 15 | 6 | +9 | 39 | 1.56 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
20 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 14 | 0.74 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
22 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 27 | 1.35 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 17 | -7 | 25 | 1.14 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 15 | 1.25 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 4 | 11 | 5 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 23 | 1.15 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
23 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 8 | 27 | -19 | 11 | 0.55 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
13 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 22 | 1.83 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
11 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 19 | 2.11 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
14 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 10 | 2 | +8 | 25 | 1.92 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
11 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 6 | 0.55 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
12 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 17 | 1.55 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 14 | 1.27 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 7 | 1.75 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
11 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 12 | 1.2 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
11 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 5 | 0.5 |
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
12 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 5 | +11 | 23 | 2.09 |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
12 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 12 | 1 |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
12 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 14 | 1.17 |
| 4 |
LA Force |
9 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 8 | 1 |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
10 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 10 | 1.11 |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
12 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 11 | 1 |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
8 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 1 |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
12 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 11 | 1.1 |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
12 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 6 | 0.6 |
Performance in the 1st half: Syracuse Pulse - 2022
It can be quite helpful to take a closer look at a team’s performance only in the first half of football games. Whether it’s the tactics of the coach or the comparison of their performance with other teams, they provide a glimpse into their overall play.
So if we only look at the first half of the match, we can see how Syracuse Pulse has performed compared to other teams in the NISA in terms of their initial tactics over the first 45 minutes.
Below are some deeper insights on how Syracuse Pulse has played in the 1st half of their games in NISA 2022:
- Taking into account only the first 45 minutes of the matches played, in 23 games so far, Syracuse Pulse has won 4 games in the first half, drew 11, and lost 5 matches.
- As a result, Syracuse Pulse is ranked 6th in the competition based on their performance in the first half of games.
- And in terms of points per match, if we analyse just the first 45 minutes of all the matches played, Syracuse Pulse would be averaging 1.15 points per match in this championship.
You can also check out Syracuse Pulse’s first half statistics for both home and away matches in the NISA 2022.