Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
25 | 60% | 48% | 28% |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
23 | 83% | 70% | 61% |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
26 | 54% | 38% | 27% |
| 4 |
LA Force |
20 | 50% | 30% | 10% |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
22 | 32% | 18% | 9% |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 67% | 63% | 33% |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
12 | 58% | 42% | 17% |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 61% | 57% | 30% |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
23 | 61% | 39% | 22% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
25 | 44% | 32% | 16% |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
23 | 78% | 65% | 43% |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
26 | 62% | 50% | 23% |
| 4 |
LA Force |
20 | 65% | 20% | 10% |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
22 | 18% | 14% | 5% |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 75% | 42% | 25% |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
12 | 50% | 33% | 33% |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 61% | 48% | 22% |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
23 | 65% | 43% | 17% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Chattanooga FC |
25 | 72% | 48% | 36% |
| 2 |
ASC San Diego |
23 | 83% | 61% | 43% |
| 3 |
Michigan Stars |
26 | 38% | 31% | 19% |
| 4 |
LA Force |
20 | 55% | 25% | 10% |
| 5 |
California Utd Strikers |
22 | 50% | 23% | 14% |
| 6 |
Maryland Bobcats |
24 | 63% | 54% | 17% |
| 7 |
Bay Cities |
12 | 50% | 42% | 8% |
| 8 |
Valley United |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Syracuse Pulse |
23 | 61% | 39% | 17% |
| 10 |
Flower City Union |
23 | 48% | 30% | 17% |
Syracuse Pulse card statistics
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Syracuse Pulse’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 48% of their games played so far in the NISA 2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Syracuse Pulse’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 61% of their NISA matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Syracuse Pulse this season in the NISA:
- Overall, matches involving Syracuse Pulse have had 4 or more cards 61% of the time (those are cards given to both Syracuse Pulse and their opponents).
- In terms of Fair Play, Syracuse Pulse is in 5th place in the competition.
You can follow the Syracuse Pulse’s card situation in NISA all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.