# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
13 | 68% |
2 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
13 | 65% |
3 |
![]() One Knoxville |
12 | 63% |
4 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
11 | 52% |
5 |
![]() Naples |
11 | 52% |
6 |
![]() Westchester SC |
10 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
9 | 45% |
8 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
9 | 43% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
9 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
8 | 40% |
11 |
![]() AV Alta |
8 | 38% |
12 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 33% |
13 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
6 | 33% |
14 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
7 | 33% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
8 | 73% |
3 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
7 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 60% |
5 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
6 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
7 | 58% |
7 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
6 | 55% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Forward Madison |
6 | 46% |
11 |
![]() AV Alta |
5 | 45% |
12 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
4 | 40% |
14 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
4 | 40% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 75% |
2 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 70% |
3 |
![]() Naples |
6 | 55% |
4 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
5 | 45% |
5 |
![]() One Knoxville |
5 | 45% |
6 |
![]() Union Omaha |
5 | 42% |
7 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 40% |
8 |
![]() AV Alta |
3 | 30% |
9 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 30% |
10 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
3 | 27% |
11 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
3 | 27% |
12 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
2 | 22% |
13 |
![]() Texoma |
2 | 20% |
14 |
![]() Forward Madison |
1 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
14 | 66% |
2 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
12 | 66% |
3 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
14 | 66% |
4 |
![]() AV Alta |
13 | 61% |
5 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
12 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Texoma |
13 | 59% |
7 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
12 | 57% |
8 |
![]() Union Omaha |
11 | 55% |
9 |
![]() Westchester SC |
10 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Naples |
10 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
10 | 47% |
12 |
![]() One Knoxville |
7 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
7 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
6 | 31% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 60% |
2 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
6 | 60% |
3 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
4 | 57% |
4 |
![]() AV Alta |
6 | 54% |
5 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 50% |
7 |
![]() Union Omaha |
4 | 50% |
8 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
5 | 45% |
9 |
![]() Texoma |
5 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Westchester SC |
4 | 40% |
11 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
4 | 40% |
12 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
4 | 36% |
13 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
3 | 27% |
14 |
![]() One Knoxville |
1 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Forward Madison |
7 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Texoma |
8 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Richmond Kickers |
7 | 77% |
4 |
![]() Greenville Triumph |
8 | 72% |
5 |
![]() Portland Hearts of Pine |
8 | 72% |
6 |
![]() AV Alta |
7 | 70% |
7 |
![]() Charlotte Independence |
7 | 70% |
8 |
![]() Westchester SC |
6 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Union Omaha |
7 | 58% |
10 |
![]() South Georgia Tormenta FC |
6 | 54% |
11 |
![]() One Knoxville |
6 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Naples |
5 | 45% |
13 |
![]() Chattanooga Red Wolves |
3 | 30% |
14 |
![]() Spokane Velocity |
2 | 25% |
This page keeps track of the number of matches a team has scored or conceded the first goal in a match. This helps give you a better idea of what to expect from Forward Madison and Spokane Velocity in terms of their tendencies from both an attacking and defensive perspective.
Forward Madison has come out and scored the first goal in 33% of the matches they have played so far in the USL League One. And on the other side, they have conceded the first goal in 66% of matches.
Meanwhile, Spokane Velocity comes into this contest having scored a goal before their opponent in 68% of matches in this campaign. And in terms of giving up the first goal, they have done so in 31% of matches.
This information helps to provide a deeper insight into the two teams’ play in the competition. A higher rate of scoring the first goal indicates a more aggressive side that imposes its will onto its opponents. Similarly, a high rate of conceding the first goal points to a side whose defence struggles to keep things tight at the back.
It should prove useful to study these teams’ tendencies of scoring or conceding first, as well as whether these tendencies change when they play at home or away in USL League One.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.