Country
Sweden
Teams
32
Season
2022
Matches
480/480
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() GAIS |
30 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Sandviken |
30 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Falkenberg |
30 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Trollhättan |
30 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Örebro Syrianska |
30 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Gefle |
30 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Hammarby Talang |
30 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Ljungskile |
30 | 57% |
9 |
![]() Oddevold |
30 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Tvååker |
30 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Motala |
30 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Umeå |
30 | 53% |
13 |
![]() Olympic |
30 | 53% |
14 |
![]() IF Karlstad |
30 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Sollentuna |
30 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Piteå |
30 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Vasalund |
30 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Lindome |
30 | 47% |
19 |
![]() Ängelholm |
30 | 47% |
20 |
![]() Stockholm Internazionale |
30 | 43% |
21 |
![]() Qviding FIF |
30 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Sylvia |
30 | 40% |
23 |
![]() Lund |
30 | 40% |
24 |
![]() Täby |
30 | 40% |
25 |
![]() Torns |
30 | 37% |
26 |
![]() Vänersborgs IF |
30 | 33% |
27 |
![]() Haninge |
30 | 33% |
28 |
![]() Oskarshamns AIK |
30 | 33% |
29 |
![]() Forward |
30 | 30% |
30 |
![]() Åtvidaberg |
30 | 30% |
31 |
![]() Team Thoren |
30 | 23% |
32 |
![]() IFK Malmö |
30 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Sandviken |
15 | 87% |
2 |
![]() Gefle |
15 | 80% |
3 |
![]() GAIS |
15 | 80% |
4 |
![]() Falkenberg |
15 | 80% |
5 |
![]() Motala |
15 | 73% |
6 |
![]() Hammarby Talang |
15 | 73% |
7 |
![]() Ljungskile |
15 | 67% |
8 |
![]() Oddevold |
15 | 67% |
9 |
![]() IF Karlstad |
15 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Örebro Syrianska |
15 | 60% |
11 |
![]() Trollhättan |
15 | 60% |
12 |
![]() Tvååker |
15 | 60% |
13 |
![]() Lund |
15 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Ängelholm |
15 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Umeå |
15 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Sollentuna |
15 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Piteå |
15 | 53% |
18 |
![]() Lindome |
15 | 53% |
19 |
![]() Qviding FIF |
15 | 47% |
20 |
![]() Oskarshamns AIK |
15 | 47% |
21 |
![]() Torns |
15 | 40% |
22 |
![]() Vänersborgs IF |
15 | 40% |
23 |
![]() Olympic |
15 | 40% |
24 |
![]() Stockholm Internazionale |
15 | 40% |
25 |
![]() Haninge |
15 | 33% |
26 |
![]() Sylvia |
15 | 33% |
27 |
![]() Team Thoren |
15 | 33% |
28 |
![]() Täby |
15 | 33% |
29 |
![]() Vasalund |
15 | 33% |
30 |
![]() Forward |
15 | 27% |
31 |
![]() Åtvidaberg |
15 | 20% |
32 |
![]() IFK Malmö |
15 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() GAIS |
15 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Örebro Syrianska |
15 | 67% |
3 |
![]() Olympic |
15 | 67% |
4 |
![]() Sandviken |
15 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Trollhättan |
15 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Vasalund |
15 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Falkenberg |
15 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Tvååker |
15 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Umeå |
15 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Sylvia |
15 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Stockholm Internazionale |
15 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Sollentuna |
15 | 47% |
13 |
![]() Hammarby Talang |
15 | 47% |
14 |
![]() Ljungskile |
15 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Piteå |
15 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Oddevold |
15 | 47% |
17 |
![]() Täby |
15 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Åtvidaberg |
15 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Gefle |
15 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Ängelholm |
15 | 40% |
21 |
![]() Lindome |
15 | 40% |
22 |
![]() IF Karlstad |
15 | 40% |
23 |
![]() Haninge |
15 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Torns |
15 | 33% |
25 |
![]() Motala |
15 | 33% |
26 |
![]() Qviding FIF |
15 | 33% |
27 |
![]() Forward |
15 | 33% |
28 |
![]() Vänersborgs IF |
15 | 27% |
29 |
![]() Lund |
15 | 27% |
30 |
![]() Oskarshamns AIK |
15 | 20% |
31 |
![]() IFK Malmö |
15 | 13% |
32 |
![]() Team Thoren |
15 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() IFK Malmö |
30 | 83% |
2 |
![]() Team Thoren |
30 | 77% |
3 |
![]() Åtvidaberg |
30 | 70% |
4 |
![]() Forward |
30 | 70% |
5 |
![]() Torns |
30 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Oskarshamns AIK |
30 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Qviding FIF |
30 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Vänersborgs IF |
30 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Haninge |
30 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Stockholm Internazionale |
30 | 57% |
11 |
![]() Lund |
30 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Sylvia |
30 | 53% |
13 |
![]() Lindome |
30 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Vasalund |
30 | 50% |
15 |
![]() Piteå |
30 | 50% |
16 |
![]() Täby |
30 | 50% |
17 |
![]() Sollentuna |
30 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Umeå |
30 | 47% |
19 |
![]() IF Karlstad |
30 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Ängelholm |
30 | 43% |
21 |
![]() Motala |
30 | 43% |
22 |
![]() Gefle |
30 | 40% |
23 |
![]() Olympic |
30 | 37% |
24 |
![]() Ljungskile |
30 | 37% |
25 |
![]() Hammarby Talang |
30 | 37% |
26 |
![]() Tvååker |
30 | 33% |
27 |
![]() Oddevold |
30 | 33% |
28 |
![]() Örebro Syrianska |
30 | 30% |
29 |
![]() Falkenberg |
30 | 27% |
30 |
![]() Trollhättan |
30 | 27% |
31 |
![]() Sandviken |
30 | 20% |
32 |
![]() GAIS |
30 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() IFK Malmö |
15 | 80% |
2 |
![]() Åtvidaberg |
15 | 80% |
3 |
![]() Forward |
15 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Team Thoren |
15 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Täby |
15 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Sylvia |
15 | 60% |
7 |
![]() Vasalund |
15 | 60% |
8 |
![]() Stockholm Internazionale |
15 | 60% |
9 |
![]() Torns |
15 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Haninge |
15 | 60% |
11 |
![]() Qviding FIF |
15 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Oskarshamns AIK |
15 | 53% |
13 |
![]() Vänersborgs IF |
15 | 53% |
14 |
![]() Olympic |
15 | 47% |
15 |
![]() Piteå |
15 | 47% |
16 |
![]() Lindome |
15 | 47% |
17 |
![]() Umeå |
15 | 47% |
18 |
![]() Ängelholm |
15 | 40% |
19 |
![]() Sollentuna |
15 | 40% |
20 |
![]() Trollhättan |
15 | 33% |
21 |
![]() Lund |
15 | 33% |
22 |
![]() Ljungskile |
15 | 33% |
23 |
![]() IF Karlstad |
15 | 33% |
24 |
![]() Örebro Syrianska |
15 | 27% |
25 |
![]() Hammarby Talang |
15 | 27% |
26 |
![]() Gefle |
15 | 20% |
27 |
![]() GAIS |
15 | 20% |
28 |
![]() Tvååker |
15 | 20% |
29 |
![]() Oddevold |
15 | 20% |
30 |
![]() Motala |
15 | 20% |
31 |
![]() Sandviken |
15 | 13% |
32 |
![]() Falkenberg |
15 | 13% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Team Thoren |
15 | 87% |
2 |
![]() IFK Malmö |
15 | 87% |
3 |
![]() Lund |
15 | 73% |
4 |
![]() Qviding FIF |
15 | 67% |
5 |
![]() Forward |
15 | 67% |
6 |
![]() Vänersborgs IF |
15 | 67% |
7 |
![]() Motala |
15 | 67% |
8 |
![]() Oskarshamns AIK |
15 | 67% |
9 |
![]() Torns |
15 | 67% |
10 |
![]() Åtvidaberg |
15 | 60% |
11 |
![]() Gefle |
15 | 60% |
12 |
![]() Haninge |
15 | 60% |
13 |
![]() Lindome |
15 | 60% |
14 |
![]() IF Karlstad |
15 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Piteå |
15 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Sollentuna |
15 | 53% |
17 |
![]() Stockholm Internazionale |
15 | 53% |
18 |
![]() Hammarby Talang |
15 | 47% |
19 |
![]() Ängelholm |
15 | 47% |
20 |
![]() Sylvia |
15 | 47% |
21 |
![]() Tvååker |
15 | 47% |
22 |
![]() Umeå |
15 | 47% |
23 |
![]() Oddevold |
15 | 47% |
24 |
![]() Falkenberg |
15 | 40% |
25 |
![]() Ljungskile |
15 | 40% |
26 |
![]() Vasalund |
15 | 40% |
27 |
![]() Örebro Syrianska |
15 | 33% |
28 |
![]() Täby |
15 | 33% |
29 |
![]() Olympic |
15 | 27% |
30 |
![]() Sandviken |
15 | 27% |
31 |
![]() Trollhättan |
15 | 20% |
32 |
![]() GAIS |
15 | 7% |
Find information on how many times a team scores or concedes the first goal in Division 1 2022 in a flash as you have everything you need right here.
While this stat may not seem like the most important, it is nevertheless valuable data in terms of finding daily trends and patterns of a particular team in Division 1.
If a team usually scores first, it is a sign that it starts the match looking to attack. And if a club consistently concedes the first goal, it may mean that this team has a defence that struggles to contain the opposition long enough.
Let’s take a look at the teams who are on top of the table in scoring and conceding the first goal in Division 1:
And as always, you can find more data points for team scoring and conceding the first goal in the form of the home and away match filter.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.