Shandong Luneng Logotipo del equipo

Estadísticas de Shandong Luneng

Información del equipo

Temporada

País

Estadio

2025

China

Jinan Olympic Sports Center Stadium

Competición

China

Super Liga China

Asia

AFC Champions League

Asia

AFC Champions League

Resumen Calendario de Partidos Resultados del Partido Equipo Mejores Jugadores Clasificación

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai Shenhua	24	92%	88%	83%	71%	50%	42%	33%	12.25
2	Meizhou Hakka	23	78%	74%	61%	52%	35%	30%	26%	11.21
3	Yunnan Yukun	24	83%	71%	58%	46%	46%	33%	25%	10.88
4	Henan Jianye	24	83%	71%	58%	42%	25%	25%	25%	10.46
5	Shandong Luneng	24	83%	75%	46%	42%	29%	21%	17%	10.21
6	Beijing Guoan	24	75%	67%	50%	38%	25%	17%	13%	9.91
7	Qingdao Jonoon	23	61%	57%	48%	48%	39%	22%	17%	9.91
8	Qingdao Youth Island	23	65%	48%	43%	39%	39%	35%	30%	9.91
9	Dalian Zhixing	23	83%	74%	65%	43%	22%	4%	4%	9.73
10	Shanghai SIPG	24	83%	67%	54%	29%	17%	13%	4%	9.63
11	Changchun Yatai	24	63%	58%	50%	38%	25%	21%	13%	9.63
12	Chengdu Better City FC	24	67%	58%	50%	25%	21%	21%	8%	9.29
13	Tianjin Teda	24	54%	50%	29%	25%	25%	21%	17%	9.17
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	24	75%	67%	58%	38%	17%	4%	4%	9.05
15	Hangzhou	24	63%	54%	42%	29%	17%	13%	8%	9.04
16	Wuhan Three Towns	24	63%	50%	38%	21%	8%	8%	8%	8.59

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai Shenhua	11	91%	91%	82%	64%	45%	45%	36%	12.27
2	Meizhou Hakka	11	82%	82%	64%	55%	27%	18%	18%	11.28
3	Yunnan Yukun	12	83%	75%	58%	33%	33%	25%	17%	10.41
4	Henan Jianye	12	75%	67%	50%	42%	17%	17%	17%	9.42
5	Shandong Luneng	12	83%	83%	67%	67%	42%	33%	25%	11.5
6	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	73%	55%	36%	36%	27%	18%	10.36
7	Qingdao Jonoon	12	50%	42%	33%	33%	33%	17%	17%	9
8	Qingdao Youth Island	12	67%	50%	42%	42%	42%	42%	42%	10.5
9	Dalian Zhixing	12	83%	75%	58%	50%	25%	8%	8%	10
10	Shanghai SIPG	13	85%	54%	46%	31%	8%	8%	8%	9.54
11	Changchun Yatai	12	50%	50%	50%	33%	25%	17%	8%	8.75
12	Chengdu Better City FC	13	77%	69%	54%	23%	23%	23%	0%	9.61
13	Tianjin Teda	11	45%	36%	36%	36%	36%	27%	18%	9.18
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	83%	75%	67%	42%	17%	0%	0%	9.41
15	Hangzhou	12	75%	67%	42%	25%	17%	8%	8%	8.83
16	Wuhan Three Towns	12	67%	42%	33%	17%	17%	17%	17%	9.08

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai Shenhua	13	92%	85%	85%	77%	54%	38%	31%	12.23
2	Meizhou Hakka	12	75%	67%	58%	50%	42%	42%	33%	11.17
3	Yunnan Yukun	12	83%	67%	58%	58%	58%	42%	33%	11.34
4	Henan Jianye	12	92%	75%	67%	42%	33%	33%	33%	11.5
5	Shandong Luneng	12	83%	67%	25%	17%	17%	8%	8%	8.91
6	Beijing Guoan	13	77%	62%	46%	38%	15%	8%	8%	9.53
7	Qingdao Jonoon	11	73%	73%	64%	64%	45%	27%	18%	10.91
8	Qingdao Youth Island	11	64%	45%	45%	36%	36%	27%	18%	9.28
9	Dalian Zhixing	11	82%	73%	73%	36%	18%	0%	0%	9.46
10	Shanghai SIPG	11	82%	82%	64%	27%	27%	18%	0%	9.73
11	Changchun Yatai	12	75%	67%	50%	42%	25%	25%	17%	10.5
12	Chengdu Better City FC	11	55%	45%	45%	27%	18%	18%	18%	8.91
13	Tianjin Teda	13	62%	62%	23%	15%	15%	15%	15%	9.15
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	67%	58%	50%	33%	17%	8%	8%	8.67
15	Hangzhou	12	50%	42%	42%	33%	17%	17%	8%	9.25
16	Wuhan Three Towns	12	58%	58%	42%	25%	0%	0%	0%	8.08

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	24	83%	75%	54%	33%	25%	8%	0%	4.71
2	Henan Jianye	24	88%	83%	75%	63%	38%	38%	21%	6.08
3	Hangzhou	24	67%	50%	38%	21%	17%	8%	0%	3.83
4	Beijing Guoan	24	88%	75%	63%	50%	29%	21%	13%	5.58
5	Changchun Yatai	24	75%	50%	38%	29%	21%	4%	0%	4.13
6	Shandong Luneng	24	79%	79%	63%	50%	38%	17%	8%	5.13
7	Shanghai Shenhua	24	96%	96%	96%	88%	83%	58%	29%	8.04
8	Tianjin Teda	24	71%	38%	33%	29%	21%	17%	13%	4.21
9	Meizhou Hakka	23	83%	74%	65%	48%	39%	30%	26%	6.17
10	Qingdao Jonoon	23	78%	52%	35%	22%	17%	13%	4%	4.04
11	Wuhan Three Towns	24	58%	38%	29%	25%	17%	8%	4%	3.67
12	Chengdu Better City FC	24	88%	75%	63%	58%	38%	21%	13%	5.71
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	24	83%	50%	33%	25%	8%	4%	4%	4.13
14	Qingdao Youth Island	23	74%	52%	26%	26%	22%	13%	4%	4.17
15	Dalian Zhixing	23	96%	78%	57%	52%	35%	13%	13%	5.43
16	Yunnan Yukun	24	75%	54%	42%	33%	29%	21%	8%	4.38

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	13	92%	92%	69%	38%	31%	8%	0%	5.31
2	Henan Jianye	12	75%	75%	75%	58%	42%	42%	17%	5.75
3	Hangzhou	12	67%	42%	42%	17%	17%	0%	0%	3.58
4	Beijing Guoan	11	100%	82%	73%	64%	45%	45%	27%	7
5	Changchun Yatai	12	75%	42%	25%	17%	8%	0%	0%	3.67
6	Shandong Luneng	12	100%	100%	83%	67%	50%	25%	17%	6.42
7	Shanghai Shenhua	11	100%	100%	100%	100%	91%	73%	36%	9.09
8	Tianjin Teda	11	82%	55%	45%	36%	36%	36%	27%	5.73
9	Meizhou Hakka	11	82%	82%	73%	55%	45%	36%	27%	6.73
10	Qingdao Jonoon	12	75%	50%	42%	25%	17%	17%	8%	4.08
11	Wuhan Three Towns	12	92%	58%	50%	42%	25%	17%	8%	5.08
12	Chengdu Better City FC	13	100%	92%	69%	69%	54%	31%	15%	6.46
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	92%	75%	42%	33%	17%	8%	8%	4.83
14	Qingdao Youth Island	12	75%	67%	33%	33%	33%	25%	8%	4.75
15	Dalian Zhixing	12	100%	92%	67%	58%	42%	17%	17%	5.92
16	Yunnan Yukun	12	83%	67%	50%	42%	33%	17%	8%	4.83

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	11	73%	55%	36%	27%	18%	9%	0%	4
2	Henan Jianye	12	100%	92%	75%	67%	33%	33%	25%	6.42
3	Hangzhou	12	67%	58%	33%	25%	17%	17%	0%	4.08
4	Beijing Guoan	13	77%	69%	54%	38%	15%	0%	0%	4.38
5	Changchun Yatai	12	75%	58%	50%	42%	33%	8%	0%	4.58
6	Shandong Luneng	12	58%	58%	42%	33%	25%	8%	0%	3.83
7	Shanghai Shenhua	13	92%	92%	92%	77%	77%	46%	23%	7.15
8	Tianjin Teda	13	62%	23%	23%	23%	8%	0%	0%	2.92
9	Meizhou Hakka	12	83%	67%	58%	42%	33%	25%	25%	5.67
10	Qingdao Jonoon	11	82%	55%	27%	18%	18%	9%	0%	4
11	Wuhan Three Towns	12	25%	17%	8%	8%	8%	0%	0%	2.25
12	Chengdu Better City FC	11	73%	55%	55%	45%	18%	9%	9%	4.82
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	75%	25%	25%	17%	0%	0%	0%	3.42
14	Qingdao Youth Island	11	73%	36%	18%	18%	9%	0%	0%	3.55
15	Dalian Zhixing	11	91%	64%	45%	45%	27%	9%	9%	4.91
16	Yunnan Yukun	12	67%	42%	33%	25%	25%	25%	8%	3.92

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	24	79%	63%	46%	42%	25%	17%	17%	4.92
2	Henan Jianye	24	79%	58%	38%	33%	21%	13%	13%	4.38
3	Hangzhou	24	79%	71%	71%	46%	33%	17%	8%	5.21
4	Beijing Guoan	24	71%	63%	46%	33%	29%	21%	0%	4.33
5	Changchun Yatai	24	92%	67%	54%	46%	29%	17%	17%	5.5
6	Shandong Luneng	24	75%	71%	54%	42%	38%	17%	4%	5.08
7	Shanghai Shenhua	24	75%	50%	38%	33%	21%	17%	0%	4.21
8	Tianjin Teda	24	88%	71%	33%	33%	29%	13%	13%	4.96
9	Meizhou Hakka	23	78%	65%	52%	39%	22%	17%	13%	5.04
10	Qingdao Jonoon	23	87%	70%	65%	52%	43%	35%	17%	5.87
11	Wuhan Three Towns	24	96%	63%	50%	38%	29%	13%	4%	4.92
12	Chengdu Better City FC	24	63%	42%	29%	25%	13%	4%	0%	3.58
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	24	71%	63%	58%	46%	33%	17%	8%	4.92
14	Qingdao Youth Island	23	87%	70%	57%	52%	39%	35%	22%	5.74
15	Dalian Zhixing	23	74%	57%	52%	35%	26%	9%	0%	4.3
16	Yunnan Yukun	24	88%	79%	67%	58%	46%	38%	25%	6.5

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	13	77%	54%	31%	31%	8%	8%	8%	4.23
2	Henan Jianye	12	67%	50%	33%	25%	8%	8%	8%	3.67
3	Hangzhou	12	83%	75%	75%	50%	33%	8%	0%	5.25
4	Beijing Guoan	11	55%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.36
5	Changchun Yatai	12	83%	58%	50%	42%	42%	17%	17%	5.08
6	Shandong Luneng	12	67%	67%	58%	42%	33%	17%	8%	5.08
7	Shanghai Shenhua	11	64%	27%	18%	18%	9%	0%	0%	3.18
8	Tianjin Teda	11	82%	55%	9%	9%	9%	0%	0%	3.45
9	Meizhou Hakka	11	64%	64%	64%	45%	18%	9%	0%	4.55
10	Qingdao Jonoon	12	75%	50%	50%	42%	33%	33%	17%	4.92
11	Wuhan Three Towns	12	92%	50%	33%	17%	8%	0%	0%	4
12	Chengdu Better City FC	13	54%	31%	23%	23%	8%	0%	0%	3.15
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	67%	58%	58%	50%	33%	8%	0%	4.58
14	Qingdao Youth Island	12	92%	67%	50%	50%	50%	42%	25%	5.75
15	Dalian Zhixing	12	67%	50%	42%	33%	25%	17%	0%	4.08
16	Yunnan Yukun	12	83%	75%	58%	50%	33%	25%	17%	5.58

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Shanghai SIPG	11	82%	73%	64%	55%	45%	27%	27%	5.73
2	Henan Jianye	12	92%	67%	42%	42%	33%	17%	17%	5.08
3	Hangzhou	12	75%	67%	67%	42%	33%	25%	17%	5.17
4	Beijing Guoan	13	85%	85%	62%	38%	38%	31%	0%	5.15
5	Changchun Yatai	12	100%	75%	58%	50%	17%	17%	17%	5.92
6	Shandong Luneng	12	83%	75%	50%	42%	42%	17%	0%	5.08
7	Shanghai Shenhua	13	85%	69%	54%	46%	31%	31%	0%	5.08
8	Tianjin Teda	13	92%	85%	54%	54%	46%	23%	23%	6.23
9	Meizhou Hakka	12	92%	67%	42%	33%	25%	25%	25%	5.5
10	Qingdao Jonoon	11	100%	91%	82%	64%	55%	36%	18%	6.91
11	Wuhan Three Towns	12	100%	75%	67%	58%	50%	25%	8%	5.83
12	Chengdu Better City FC	11	73%	55%	36%	27%	18%	9%	0%	4.09
13	Sichuan Jiuniu	12	75%	67%	58%	42%	33%	25%	17%	5.25
14	Qingdao Youth Island	11	82%	73%	64%	55%	27%	27%	18%	5.73
15	Dalian Zhixing	11	82%	64%	64%	36%	27%	0%	0%	4.55
16	Yunnan Yukun	12	92%	83%	75%	67%	58%	50%	33%	7.42