China
Super Liga China

Añadir a los Favoritos

Tianjin Teda 1 - 0 Shanghai SIPG

26.11.2022 - 07:00

Estadio: Tianjin Olympic Center Stadium

Terminado

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Dalian Yifang	33	76%	58%	58%	39%	27%	15%	6%	9.55
2	Wuhan Three Towns	33	70%	58%	58%	33%	21%	18%	12%	9.52
3	Changchun Yatai	33	76%	64%	52%	36%	24%	15%	12%	9.3
4	Hangzhou	33	61%	48%	39%	24%	18%	15%	12%	9.15
5	Shandong Luneng	33	70%	48%	36%	24%	15%	12%	6%	9.07
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	33	67%	48%	36%	24%	21%	12%	6%	9
7	Shanghai SIPG	33	67%	55%	39%	24%	18%	18%	18%	9
8	Chengdu Better City FC	33	67%	55%	42%	33%	21%	12%	3%	9
9	Beijing Guoan	33	64%	48%	39%	24%	18%	18%	12%	8.97
10	Guangzhou R&F	33	61%	48%	39%	30%	24%	21%	15%	8.94
11	Henan Jianye	33	61%	48%	42%	24%	15%	15%	12%	8.87
12	Wuhan Zall	33	67%	55%	33%	24%	21%	15%	9%	8.73
13	Shenzhen	33	67%	45%	36%	24%	15%	12%	3%	8.69
14	Meizhou Hakka	33	55%	52%	42%	27%	12%	9%	6%	8.57
15	Shanghai Shenhua	33	55%	48%	33%	24%	12%	9%	3%	8.37
16	Hebei CFFC	33	67%	39%	24%	15%	12%	9%	3%	8.31
17	Tianjin Teda	33	55%	36%	27%	15%	15%	9%	6%	7.84
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	33	45%	36%	30%	18%	9%	6%	6%	7.73

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Dalian Yifang	17	76%	53%	53%	35%	18%	12%	6%	9.35
2	Wuhan Three Towns	16	75%	69%	69%	31%	25%	25%	13%	9.76
3	Changchun Yatai	17	76%	53%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	8.65
4	Hangzhou	16	75%	63%	50%	31%	31%	25%	25%	10.93
5	Shandong Luneng	16	69%	50%	31%	19%	13%	13%	0%	8.6
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	76%	59%	41%	29%	24%	18%	12%	9.7
7	Shanghai SIPG	16	69%	44%	38%	13%	6%	6%	6%	7.69
8	Chengdu Better City FC	16	69%	63%	44%	38%	25%	13%	0%	9.19
9	Beijing Guoan	17	65%	53%	41%	29%	24%	24%	18%	9.63
10	Guangzhou R&F	16	56%	50%	50%	38%	38%	31%	31%	9.38
11	Henan Jianye	17	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	6%	6%	8.69
12	Wuhan Zall	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	29%	18%	12%	8.53
13	Shenzhen	17	71%	41%	29%	24%	12%	12%	0%	8.48
14	Meizhou Hakka	16	50%	44%	38%	25%	6%	6%	6%	8.44
15	Shanghai Shenhua	16	63%	56%	44%	31%	25%	19%	6%	9.06
16	Hebei CFFC	16	63%	44%	25%	25%	19%	13%	6%	8.47
17	Tianjin Teda	17	53%	35%	24%	6%	6%	0%	0%	7.18
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	29%	24%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.18

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Dalian Yifang	16	75%	63%	63%	44%	38%	19%	6%	9.75
2	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	9.3
3	Changchun Yatai	16	75%	75%	69%	56%	44%	31%	25%	10
4	Hangzhou	17	47%	35%	29%	18%	6%	6%	0%	7.59
5	Shandong Luneng	17	71%	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	9.47
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	56%	38%	31%	19%	19%	6%	0%	8.25
7	Shanghai SIPG	17	65%	65%	41%	35%	29%	29%	29%	10.31
8	Chengdu Better City FC	17	65%	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	6%	8.82
9	Beijing Guoan	16	63%	44%	38%	19%	13%	13%	6%	8.31
10	Guangzhou R&F	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	12%	12%	0%	8.5
11	Henan Jianye	16	69%	56%	44%	25%	25%	25%	19%	9.07
12	Wuhan Zall	16	75%	56%	31%	13%	13%	13%	6%	8.94
13	Shenzhen	16	63%	50%	44%	25%	19%	13%	6%	8.94
14	Meizhou Hakka	17	59%	59%	47%	29%	18%	12%	6%	8.69
15	Shanghai Shenhua	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.71
16	Hebei CFFC	17	71%	35%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	8.18
17	Tianjin Teda	16	56%	38%	31%	25%	25%	19%	13%	8.6
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	63%	50%	38%	19%	6%	6%	6%	8.31

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	31	65%	39%	29%	19%	13%	3%	0%	3.39
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	31	65%	26%	6%	6%	3%	3%	3%	2.97
3	Shanghai SIPG	31	84%	74%	55%	42%	35%	29%	13%	5.5
4	Henan Jianye	31	81%	74%	58%	29%	23%	16%	13%	4.84
5	Hangzhou	31	84%	65%	55%	35%	19%	13%	6%	4.56
6	Beijing Guoan	31	87%	74%	58%	45%	42%	26%	10%	5.44
7	Hebei CFFC	31	29%	23%	3%	3%	0%	0%	0%	2.09
8	Changchun Yatai	31	74%	68%	52%	35%	26%	16%	13%	4.36
9	Shandong Luneng	31	97%	87%	77%	48%	35%	29%	23%	6.38
10	Guangzhou R&F	31	42%	32%	26%	19%	10%	3%	3%	2.91
11	Shanghai Shenhua	31	71%	58%	45%	29%	10%	3%	0%	3.79
12	Tianjin Teda	31	71%	55%	39%	26%	13%	10%	3%	4
13	Dalian Yifang	31	103%	81%	71%	48%	32%	26%	16%	5.58
14	Shenzhen	31	68%	55%	42%	26%	10%	6%	3%	3.91
15	Wuhan Zall	31	84%	52%	35%	16%	3%	3%	0%	3.7
16	Meizhou Hakka	31	81%	65%	52%	35%	16%	13%	6%	4.63
17	Wuhan Three Towns	31	90%	77%	52%	35%	32%	29%	23%	5.64
18	Chengdu Better City FC	31	87%	81%	71%	52%	39%	32%	16%	5.64

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	59%	35%	29%	12%	6%	0%	0%	3.29
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	59%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
3	Shanghai SIPG	16	69%	63%	44%	31%	31%	25%	6%	4.5
4	Henan Jianye	17	76%	71%	53%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.81
5	Hangzhou	16	81%	56%	56%	44%	31%	25%	13%	5.2
6	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	65%	53%	47%	47%	29%	18%	6.13
7	Hebei CFFC	16	25%	19%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.2
8	Changchun Yatai	17	88%	82%	53%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.71
9	Shandong Luneng	16	88%	75%	69%	44%	31%	25%	19%	5.93
10	Guangzhou R&F	16	44%	38%	38%	31%	13%	6%	6%	3.38
11	Shanghai Shenhua	16	75%	69%	63%	38%	13%	6%	0%	4.56
12	Tianjin Teda	17	59%	47%	35%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.59
13	Dalian Yifang	17	100%	76%	71%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.59
14	Shenzhen	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3.24
15	Wuhan Zall	17	71%	41%	35%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3.35
16	Meizhou Hakka	16	81%	69%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	4.5
17	Wuhan Three Towns	16	88%	81%	56%	44%	38%	31%	25%	6.13
18	Chengdu Better City FC	16	81%	81%	63%	50%	38%	31%	19%	5.81

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	63%	38%	25%	25%	19%	6%	0%	3.5
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	63%	19%	13%	13%	6%	6%	6%	3.25
3	Shanghai SIPG	17	88%	76%	59%	47%	35%	29%	18%	6.5
4	Henan Jianye	16	75%	69%	56%	31%	25%	19%	19%	4.88
5	Hangzhou	17	76%	65%	47%	24%	6%	0%	0%	4
6	Beijing Guoan	16	81%	75%	56%	38%	31%	19%	0%	4.75
7	Hebei CFFC	17	29%	24%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2
8	Changchun Yatai	16	50%	44%	44%	38%	31%	25%	19%	4
9	Shandong Luneng	17	94%	88%	76%	47%	35%	29%	24%	6.76
10	Guangzhou R&F	17	35%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	2.44
11	Shanghai Shenhua	17	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.06
12	Tianjin Teda	16	75%	56%	38%	25%	19%	19%	6%	4.47
13	Dalian Yifang	16	94%	75%	63%	50%	31%	25%	19%	5.56
14	Shenzhen	16	69%	56%	50%	38%	19%	13%	6%	4.67
15	Wuhan Zall	16	88%	56%	31%	19%	6%	6%	0%	4.06
16	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
17	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	65%	41%	24%	24%	24%	18%	5.18
18	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	71%	71%	47%	35%	29%	12%	5.47

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	31	97%	87%	71%	42%	29%	23%	19%	5.61
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	31	81%	71%	52%	35%	26%	19%	13%	4.76
3	Shanghai SIPG	31	61%	45%	29%	26%	10%	10%	6%	3.5
4	Henan Jianye	31	71%	52%	39%	23%	13%	13%	10%	4.03
5	Hangzhou	31	68%	58%	42%	23%	19%	16%	10%	4.59
6	Beijing Guoan	31	65%	45%	29%	19%	16%	13%	3%	3.53
7	Hebei CFFC	31	90%	87%	81%	68%	52%	23%	10%	6.22
8	Changchun Yatai	31	84%	58%	48%	39%	26%	23%	16%	4.94
9	Shandong Luneng	31	58%	29%	13%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.69
10	Guangzhou R&F	31	84%	77%	68%	52%	39%	29%	19%	6.03
11	Shanghai Shenhua	31	84%	71%	48%	32%	19%	16%	10%	4.58
12	Tianjin Teda	31	87%	48%	26%	19%	16%	6%	0%	3.84
13	Dalian Yifang	31	71%	61%	48%	32%	10%	6%	3%	3.97
14	Shenzhen	31	90%	77%	52%	29%	19%	13%	6%	4.78
15	Wuhan Zall	31	84%	71%	55%	45%	29%	23%	13%	5.03
16	Meizhou Hakka	31	68%	48%	39%	19%	13%	13%	6%	3.94
17	Wuhan Three Towns	31	61%	52%	45%	26%	13%	13%	6%	3.88
18	Chengdu Better City FC	31	58%	45%	42%	16%	13%	3%	0%	3.36

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	94%	88%	71%	53%	41%	29%	29%	6.41
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	76%	59%	29%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.47
3	Shanghai SIPG	16	56%	38%	25%	19%	6%	6%	6%	3.19
4	Henan Jianye	17	59%	29%	29%	24%	18%	18%	12%	3.88
5	Hangzhou	16	69%	63%	56%	31%	25%	19%	19%	5.73
6	Beijing Guoan	17	59%	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	0%	3.5
7	Hebei CFFC	16	81%	81%	69%	56%	44%	19%	13%	6.27
8	Changchun Yatai	17	71%	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
9	Shandong Luneng	16	56%	31%	13%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.67
10	Guangzhou R&F	16	75%	69%	63%	44%	38%	31%	19%	6
11	Shanghai Shenhua	16	69%	56%	44%	38%	25%	19%	13%	4.5
12	Tianjin Teda	17	82%	35%	24%	18%	12%	12%	0%	3.59
13	Dalian Yifang	17	65%	59%	47%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.76
14	Shenzhen	17	100%	76%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	5.24
15	Wuhan Zall	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	29%	29%	18%	5.18
16	Meizhou Hakka	16	75%	50%	38%	13%	6%	6%	6%	3.94
17	Wuhan Three Towns	16	50%	50%	44%	25%	6%	6%	0%	3.63
18	Chengdu Better City FC	16	56%	50%	44%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.38

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	88%	75%	63%	25%	13%	13%	6%	4.75
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	75%	75%	69%	38%	31%	19%	13%	5.06
3	Shanghai SIPG	17	59%	47%	29%	29%	12%	12%	6%	3.81
4	Henan Jianye	16	75%	69%	44%	19%	6%	6%	6%	4.19
5	Hangzhou	17	59%	47%	24%	12%	12%	12%	0%	3.59
6	Beijing Guoan	16	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	13%	6%	3.56
7	Hebei CFFC	17	88%	82%	82%	71%	53%	24%	6%	6.18
8	Changchun Yatai	16	88%	63%	63%	50%	31%	31%	25%	6
9	Shandong Luneng	17	53%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
10	Guangzhou R&F	17	82%	76%	65%	53%	35%	24%	18%	6.06
11	Shanghai Shenhua	17	88%	76%	47%	24%	12%	12%	6%	4.65
12	Tianjin Teda	16	81%	56%	25%	19%	19%	0%	0%	4.13
13	Dalian Yifang	16	69%	56%	44%	31%	13%	6%	6%	4.19
14	Shenzhen	16	69%	69%	44%	19%	6%	6%	6%	4.27
15	Wuhan Zall	16	81%	69%	50%	44%	25%	13%	6%	4.88
16	Meizhou Hakka	17	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	18%	6%	3.94
17	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	41%	24%	18%	18%	12%	4.12
18	Chengdu Better City FC	17	53%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	0%	3.35

Partido anterior

Shenzhen Logotipo del equipo

Wuhan Three Towns Logotipo del equipo

Zibo Cuju Logotipo del equipo

Beijing BG Logotipo del equipo

Siguiente Partido