Union Macomb vs Oakland County estadísticas y enfrentamientos
dom, 08 junio 2025 - 19:30
Terminado
Estadísticas Pós Partido
Las estadísticas serán actualizadas cuando tengamos datos
Frente a Frente Tendencias
Partidos Sufriendo Goles
Union Macomb
3
Sin Derrotas
Oakland County
3
Equipo Tendencias
Partidos Sufriendo Goles
Union Macomb
5
Más de 2.5 Goles
Oakland County
6
Partidos Sufriendo Goles
Oakland County
4
Menos de 9.5 Córners
Oakland County
3
Promedio de Goles
3.09
Liga: 3.3
Ambos Marcan
84%
Liga 54%
Más de 1.5+
100%
Liga 81%
Más de 2.5+
75%
Liga 61%
Tarjetas
0
Liga 5.33
Córners
7
Liga 8.77
Equipo de Casa
Union Macomb
USA - USL League Two
| Forma | Últimos 5 | PPP |
|---|---|---|
| General | V D E D V |
1.67 |
| Casa | E V E V V |
2 |
| Visitante | V D D V D |
1.5 |
| Estadísticas | General | Casa | Visitante |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria % | 50% | 50% | 50% |
| Goles | 2.33 | 2.5 | 2.25 |
| Marcados | 1.17 | 1.5 | 1 |
| Sufridos | 1.17 | 1 | 1.25 |
| Ambos Marcan | 50% | 100% | 25% |
| Portería a Cero | 17% | 0% | 25% |
| Sin Marcar | 33% | 0% | 50% |
| Marca Primero | 33% | 0% | 50% |
|
xG
|
1.01 | 1.11 | 0.9 |
|
xGA
|
1.06 | 1.47 | 0.66 |
Equipo de Fuera
Oakland County
USA - USL League Two
| Forma | Últimos 5 | PPP |
|---|---|---|
| General | D D V D V |
1.2 |
| Casa | D V D E V |
1.5 |
| Visitante | D V D E V |
1 |
| Estadísticas | General | Casa | Visitante |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria % | 40% | 50% | 33% |
| Goles | 3.8 | 4 | 3.67 |
| Marcados | 1.8 | 2.5 | 1.33 |
| Sufridos | 2 | 1.5 | 2.33 |
| Ambos Marcan | 60% | 50% | 67% |
| Portería a Cero | 20% | 50% | 0% |
| Sin Marcar | 20% | 0% | 33% |
| Marca Primero | 33% | 100% | 33% |
|
xG
|
0.72 | 0 | 1.22 |
|
xGA
|
1.61 | 0 | 2.11 |
Más de 0.5+
100%
100%
Promedio
100%
Más de 1.5+
83%
92%
Promedio
100%
Más de 2.5+
50%
75%
Promedio
100%
Más de 3.5+
0%
30%
Promedio
60%
Más de 4.5+
0%
10%
Promedio
20%
Más de 5.5+
0%
0%
Promedio
0%
Union Macomb - Últimos Partidos
Oakland County - Últimos Partidos
Forma
1.67/Partido
+39%
Union Macomb es +39% mejor a nivel de Forma
1.2/Partido
Forma - Últimos 5
1.4/Partido
+17%
Union Macomb es +17% mejor a nivel de Forma
1.2/Partido
Goles Marcados
1.17/Partido
+54%
Oakland County es +54% mejor a nivel de Goles Marcados
1.8/Partido
Lansing City (2)
Michigan Bucks (0)
Ann Arbor (1)
Oakland County (0)
Kalamazoo FC (2)
Midwest United (2)
Oakland County (1)
(2) Midwest United
(3) Northern Indiana
(1) Ann Arbor
(4) Michigan Bucks
(0) Union Macomb
(4) Kalamazoo FC
(1) Union Macomb
Goles Sufridos
1.17/Partido
+71%
Oakland County es +71% mejor a nivel de Goles Sufridos
2/Partido
Lansing City (2)
Michigan Bucks (0)
Ann Arbor (1)
Oakland County (0)
Kalamazoo FC (2)
Midwest United (2)
Oakland County (1)
(2) Midwest United
(3) Northern Indiana
(1) Ann Arbor
(4) Michigan Bucks
(0) Union Macomb
(4) Kalamazoo FC
(1) Union Macomb
xG
1.01/Partido
+40%
Union Macomb es +40% mejor a nivel de Goles Esperados
0.72/Partido
Lansing City (1.21)
Michigan Bucks (0.61)
Ann Arbor (0.21)
Oakland County (0.21)
Kalamazoo FC (0)
Midwest United (0)
Oakland County (1.16)
(-0.06) Midwest United
(-0.06) Northern Indiana
(-0.06) Ann Arbor
(0) Michigan Bucks
(0) Union Macomb
(1.16) Kalamazoo FC
(1.16) Union Macomb
xGA
1.06/Partido
+52%
Oakland County es +52% mejor a nivel de Goles Esperados Contra
1.61/Partido
Lansing City (1.33)
Michigan Bucks (0.97)
Ann Arbor (0.53)
Oakland County (0.53)
Kalamazoo FC (0)
Midwest United (0)
Oakland County (1.44)
(1.65) Midwest United
(1.65) Northern Indiana
(1.65) Ann Arbor
(0) Michigan Bucks
(0) Union Macomb
(1.31) Kalamazoo FC
(1.31) Union Macomb
Forma - 1ª Mitad
2.33/Partido
+17%
Union Macomb es +17% mejor a nivel de Forma 1ª Mitad
2/Partido
Más de 0.5+
100%
100%
Promedio
100%
Más de 1.5+
67%
67%
Promedio
67%
Más de 2.5+
33%
33%
Promedio
33%
Fueras de Juego
0/Partido
0 Fueras de Juego / Partido
Fueras de Juego son calculados con la suma de promedios de Fueras de Juego Union Macomb y del Oakland County durante la temporada 2025 de USA USL League Two.
0/Partido
Lansing City (-1)
Michigan Bucks (-1)
Ann Arbor (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
Kalamazoo FC (-1)
Midwest United (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
(-1) Midwest United
(-1) Northern Indiana
(-1) Ann Arbor
(-1) Michigan Bucks
(-1) Union Macomb
(-1) Kalamazoo FC
(-1) Union Macomb
Córners
8.75/Partido
16.75 Córners / Partido
Corners del Partido son calculados con la suma de promedios de Corners del Union Macomb y del Oakland County durante la temporada 2025 de USA USL League Two.
8/Partido
Lansing City (10)
Michigan Bucks (3)
Ann Arbor (4)
Oakland County (-1)
Kalamazoo FC (2)
Midwest United (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
(6) Midwest United
(-1) Northern Indiana
(-1) Ann Arbor
(2) Michigan Bucks
(-1) Union Macomb
(5) Kalamazoo FC
(-1) Union Macomb
Tarjetas
0/Partido
0 Tarjetas / Partido
Tarjetas del Partido son calculados con la suma de promedios de Tarjetas Amarillas del Union Macomb y del Oakland County durante la temporada 2025 de USA USL League Two.
0/Partido
Lansing City (-1)
Michigan Bucks (-1)
Ann Arbor (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
Kalamazoo FC (-1)
Midwest United (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
(-1) Midwest United
(-1) Northern Indiana
(-1) Ann Arbor
(-1) Michigan Bucks
(-1) Union Macomb
(1) Kalamazoo FC
(-1) Union Macomb
Tiros a Puerta
5/Partido
10 Tiros a Puerta / Partido
Tiros del Partido son calculados con la suma de promedios de Tiros a Puerta del Union Macomb y del Oakland County durante la temporada 2025 de USA USL League Two.
5/Partido
Lansing City (2)
Michigan Bucks (1)
Ann Arbor (2)
Oakland County (-1)
Kalamazoo FC (5)
Midwest United (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
(2) Midwest United
(-1) Northern Indiana
(-1) Ann Arbor
(2) Michigan Bucks
(-1) Union Macomb
(5) Kalamazoo FC
(-1) Union Macomb
Union Macomb - Últimos Partidos
Oakland County - Últimos Partidos
Forma
2/Partido
+100%
Union Macomb es +100% mejor a nivel de Forma
1/Partido
Forma - Últimos 5
2/Partido
2/Partido
+100%
Union Macomb es +100% mejor a nivel de Forma
1/Partido
Goles Marcados
1.5/Partido
+13%
Union Macomb es +13% mejor a nivel de Goles Marcados
1.33/Partido
Ann Arbor (1)
Kalamazoo FC (2)
Oakland County (1)
Michigan Bucks (3)
Lansing City (3)
(2) Midwest United
(1) Ann Arbor
(4) Michigan Bucks
(1) Union Macomb
(2) South Bend Lions
Goles Sufridos
1/Partido
+133%
Oakland County es +133% mejor a nivel de Goles Sufridos
2.33/Partido
Ann Arbor (1)
Kalamazoo FC (2)
Oakland County (1)
Michigan Bucks (3)
Lansing City (3)
(2) Midwest United
(1) Ann Arbor
(4) Michigan Bucks
(1) Union Macomb
(2) South Bend Lions
xG
1.11/Partido
+10%
Oakland County es +10% mejor a nivel de Goles Esperados
1.22/Partido
Ann Arbor (1.21)
Kalamazoo FC (0)
Oakland County (1.4)
Michigan Bucks (1.4)
Lansing City (1.12)
(0.94) Midwest United
(0.94) Ann Arbor
(0) Michigan Bucks
(1.41) Union Macomb
(1.41) South Bend Lions
xGA
1.47/Partido
+123%
Union Macomb es +123% mejor a nivel de Goles Esperados Contra
0.66/Partido
Ann Arbor (0)
Kalamazoo FC (0)
Oakland County (0)
Michigan Bucks (0)
Lansing City (0)
(0) Midwest United
(0) Ann Arbor
(0) Michigan Bucks
(0) Union Macomb
(0) South Bend Lions
Forma - 1ª Mitad
1/Partido
+50%
Oakland County es +50% mejor a nivel de Forma 1ª Mitad
1.5/Partido
Más de 0.5+
100%
100%
Promedio
100%
Más de 1.5+
100%
75%
Promedio
50%
Más de 2.5+
0%
25%
Promedio
50%
Fueras de Juego
0/Partido
0 Fueras de Juego / Partido
Fueras de Juego son calculados con la suma de promedios de Fueras de Juego Union Macomb y del Oakland County durante la temporada 2025 de USA USL League Two.
0/Partido
Ann Arbor (-1)
Kalamazoo FC (-1)
Oakland County (-1)
Michigan Bucks (-1)
Lansing City (-1)
(-1) Midwest United
(-1) Ann Arbor
(-1) Michigan Bucks
(-1) Union Macomb
(-1) South Bend Lions
Córners
9.5/Partido
17.5 Córners / Partido
Corners del Partido son calculados con la suma de promedios de Corners del Union Macomb y del Oakland County durante la temporada 2025 de USA USL League Two.
8/Partido
Ann Arbor (4)
Kalamazoo FC (2)
Oakland County (-1)
Michigan Bucks (8)
Lansing City (6)
(6) Midwest United
(-1) Ann Arbor
(2) Michigan Bucks
(-1) Union Macomb
(-1) South Bend Lions
General - Cara a Cara
Portería a Cero
Union Macomb
0%
Resultados Cara a Cara
0
Victorias
1
Empate
2
Victorias
Portería a Cero
Oakland County
67%
Ambos Marcan
33%
1/3 Partidos
Más de 0.5+
100%
3/3 Partidos
Más de 1.5+
67%
2/3 Partidos
Más de 2.5+
33%
1/3 Partidos
Cara a Cara
Portería a Cero
Union Macomb
0%
Cara a Cara Resultados
0
Victorias
1
Empate
0
Victorias
Portería a Cero
Oakland County
0%
Ambos Marcan
100%
1/1 Partidos
Más de 0.5+
100%
1/1 Partidos
Más de 1.5+
100%
1/1 Partidos
Más de 2.5+
0%
0/1 Partidos
Tabla
| # | Equipo | JJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | PPP | strings.Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green
|
12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 24 | 2.00 | |
| 2 |
Dothan United
|
9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 4 | 16 | 23 | 2.56 | |
| 3 |
Ballard
|
11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 17 | 3 | 14 | 20 | 1.82 | |
| 4 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 14 | 20 | 2.50 | |
| 5 |
Michigan Bucks
|
9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 20 | 2.22 | |
| 6 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 23 | 4 | 19 | 20 | 2.50 | |
| 7 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 19 | 2.11 | |
| 8 |
Lionsbridge
|
10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 29 | 8 | 21 | 19 | 1.90 | |
| 9 |
Laredo Heat
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 10 |
Fort Wayne
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 11 |
Des Moines Menace
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 29 | 12 | 17 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 12 |
San Juan SC
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 28 | 6 | 22 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 13 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 16 | 18 | 3.00 | |
| 14 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 2.25 | |
| 15 |
Corpus Christi
|
6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 18 | 3.00 | |
| 16 |
FC Motown II
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 17 | 2.43 | |
| 17 |
Asheville City
|
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2.29 | |
| 18 |
Evergreen
|
7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 12 | 10 | 16 | 2.29 | |
| 19 |
Sueno
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 20 |
FC Tucson
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 2 | 28 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 21 |
RKC
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 22 |
Sporting JAX
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 23 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 24 |
Utah United
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 2.14 | |
| 25 |
Lane United
|
7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 2.14 | |
| 26 |
Discoveries
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 27 |
SC United Bantams
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 28 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 2.33 | |
| 29 |
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 8 | 14 | 2.33 | |
| 30 |
SF Glens
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 31 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 14 | 1.75 | |
| 32 |
Black Rock FC
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 33 |
Capo II
|
6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 2.33 | |
| 34 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 35 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 36 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 37 |
Pinellas County
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 38 |
Peoria City
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 39 |
West Chester United II
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 40 |
FC Buffalo
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 41 |
Albion Colorado
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 42 |
Hattiesburg
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 43 |
The Villages
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 44 |
Midwest United
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 45 |
Lexington II
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 46 |
City SC
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 47 |
North Carolina II
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 48 |
Rochester
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 49 |
Inter Gainesville
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 50 |
Snohomish United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 51 |
Almaden
|
8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 1.38 | |
| 52 |
Virginia Beach United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 53 |
Redlands
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| 54 |
Bangers
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 55 |
AHFC Royals
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| 56 |
Midlakes United
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 57 |
Miami FC
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| 58 |
West Seattle Junction
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 59 |
Colorado Storm
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 60 |
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 61 |
AC Connecticut
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 62 |
New England SC
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 63 |
Tennessee
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 64 |
Project 51O
|
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 65 |
Akron City
|
6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 66 |
Brazos Valley
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 67 |
Bigfoot
|
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 68 |
Sunflower State
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 69 |
Ann Arbor
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 70 |
Denton Diablos
|
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 9 | 1.80 | |
| 71 |
AMSG
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 72 |
Nona
|
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 1.80 | |
| 73 |
Lonestar
|
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 1.80 | |
| 74 |
Cedar Stars Rush
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 75 |
Kings Hammer Columbus
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 76 |
Real Central New Jersey
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 77 |
Charlottesville Blues
|
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 1.14 | |
| 78 |
Oakland County
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| 79 |
Houston FC
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| 80 |
Northern Indiana
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| 81 |
Birmingham Legion II
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| 82 |
River Light
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| 83 |
Brooke House
|
5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 8 | 1.60 | |
| 84 |
San Francisco City
|
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 7 | 1.00 | |
| 85 |
Columbus United
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 86 |
West Virginia Chaos
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 87 |
Academica
|
7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 | 1.00 | |
| 88 |
Oly Town
|
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 1.00 | |
| 89 |
Reading United
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 90 |
Kings Hammer Sun City
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 91 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 92 |
Seacoast United Phantoms
|
7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 | 0.86 | |
| 93 |
Toledo Villa
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 6 | 1.00 | |
| 94 |
FC Boston Bolts
|
7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 6 | 0.86 | |
| 95 |
Springfield
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 6 | 1.00 | |
| 96 |
Morris Elite
|
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 5 | 0.83 | |
| 97 |
Flatirons Rush
|
6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 4 | 0.67 | |
| 98 |
Union Macomb
|
6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 4 | 0.67 | |
| 99 |
Marin
|
7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 4 | 0.57 | |
| 100 |
Santafé Wanderers
|
6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 20 | -10 | 3 | 0.50 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | PPP | strings.Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 4 | 24 | 19 | 2.38 | |
| 2 |
FC Motown II
|
7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 19 | 2.71 | |
| 3 |
Snohomish United
|
9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 2.11 | |
| 4 |
Almaden
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 5 |
Virginia Beach United
|
7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 18 | 2.57 | |
| 6 |
Vermont Green
|
7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 2.43 | |
| 7 |
Ballard
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 25 | 4 | 21 | 17 | 2.13 | |
| 8 |
Lionsbridge
|
8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 2.13 | |
| 9 |
Asheville City
|
6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 22 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 2.67 | |
| 10 |
Evergreen
|
8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 16 | 2.00 | |
| 11 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 16 | 1.78 | |
| 12 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 2.00 | |
| 13 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 2.00 | |
| 14 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 16 | 1.78 | |
| 15 |
Laredo Heat
|
6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 | |
| 16 |
Fort Wayne
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 17 |
Sueno
|
8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 1.75 | |
| 18 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 2.00 | |
| 19 |
Dothan United
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 20 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 21 |
Michigan Bucks
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 22 |
Des Moines Menace
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 23 |
San Juan SC
|
8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 13 | 1.63 | |
| 24 |
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 25 |
Pinellas County
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 26 |
Peoria City
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 27 |
West Chester United II
|
7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 28 |
Midwest United
|
7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 1.86 | |
| 29 |
Flatirons Rush
|
6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 2.17 | |
| 30 |
Lexington II
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 31 |
Colorado Storm
|
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 2 | 12 | 1.71 | |
| 32 |
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 33 |
AC Connecticut
|
7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 1.71 | |
| 34 |
Ann Arbor
|
6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 35 |
Charlottesville Blues
|
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 12 | 1.71 | |
| 36 |
Oakland County
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 37 |
San Francisco City
|
7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 12 | 1.71 | |
| 38 |
Morris Elite
|
6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 12 | 2.00 | |
| 39 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 40 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 41 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 42 |
SF Glens
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 43 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| 44 |
Black Rock FC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 45 |
New England SC
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 46 |
Tennessee
|
6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 | 1.83 | |
| 47 |
Project 51O
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 48 |
Seacoast United Phantoms
|
7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 11 | 1.57 | |
| 49 |
FC Tucson
|
8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 10 | 1.25 | |
| 50 |
Utah United
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 51 |
Lane United
|
7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 52 |
Discoveries
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 53 |
Capo II
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 54 |
FC Buffalo
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 55 |
City SC
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 56 |
North Carolina II
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 57 |
Redlands
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 58 |
Bangers
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 59 |
Akron City
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 60 |
Denton Diablos
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 61 |
Houston FC
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 62 |
Columbus United
|
5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 2.00 | |
| 63 |
West Virginia Chaos
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 64 |
Academica
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 65 |
Union Macomb
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 66 |
Marin
|
7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 10 | 1.43 | |
| 67 |
Santafé Wanderers
|
6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 10 | 1.67 | |
| 68 |
RKC
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 69 |
Albion Colorado
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 70 |
Rochester
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 71 |
AHFC Royals
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 72 |
AMSG
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 73 |
Nona
|
5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1.80 | |
| 74 |
Lonestar
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 75 |
Northern Indiana
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 76 |
Birmingham Legion II
|
6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 77 |
Toledo Villa
|
6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 1.50 | |
| 78 |
Oly Town
|
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 8 | 1.14 | |
| 79 |
Reading United
|
6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 8 | 1.33 | |
| 80 |
FC Boston Bolts
|
7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 8 | 1.14 | |
| 81 |
Sporting JAX
|
7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 7 | 1.00 | |
| 82 |
SC United Bantams
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 83 |
Hattiesburg
|
5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1.40 | |
| 84 |
Brazos Valley
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 85 |
Cedar Stars Rush
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 86 |
Kings Hammer Columbus
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 87 |
River Light
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 88 |
Kings Hammer Sun City
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 89 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 7 | 1.17 | |
| 90 |
Midlakes United
|
7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 | 0.86 | |
| 91 |
Brooke House
|
6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 | 1.00 | |
| 92 |
Springfield
|
6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 26 | -16 | 6 | 1.00 | |
| 93 |
The Villages
|
5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 | 1.00 | |
| 94 |
Miami FC
|
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 5 | 0.83 | |
| 95 |
West Seattle Junction
|
7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 5 | 0.71 | |
| 96 |
Bigfoot
|
7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 5 | 0.71 | |
| 97 |
Real Central New Jersey
|
6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -1 | 5 | 0.83 | |
| 98 |
Sunflower State
|
6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 4 | 0.67 | |
| 99 |
Corpus Christi
|
6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 3 | 0.50 | |
| 100 |
Inter Gainesville
|
5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 12 | -12 | 0 | 0.00 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | V | E | D | GF | GC | DG | Pts | PPP | strings.Last 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Vermont Green
|
19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 37 | 8 | 29 | 41 | 2.16 | |
| 2 |
Western Mass Pioneers
|
17 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 48 | 9 | 39 | 38 | 2.24 | |
| 3 |
Ballard
|
19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 42 | 7 | 35 | 37 | 1.95 | |
| 4 |
Lionsbridge
|
18 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 59 | 19 | 40 | 36 | 2.00 | |
| 5 |
Dothan United
|
16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 6 | 28 | 36 | 2.25 | |
| 6 |
FC Motown II
|
14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 36 | 9 | 27 | 36 | 2.57 | |
| 7 |
Sarasota Paradise
|
14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 39 | 8 | 31 | 33 | 2.36 | |
| 8 |
Laredo Heat
|
13 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 14 | 23 | 33 | 2.54 | |
| 9 |
Michigan Bucks
|
16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 34 | 14 | 20 | 33 | 2.06 | |
| 10 |
Asheville City
|
13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 44 | 6 | 38 | 32 | 2.46 | |
| 11 |
Evergreen
|
15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 32 | 2.13 | |
| 12 |
Fort Wayne
|
14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 10 | 17 | 32 | 2.29 | |
| 13 |
Des Moines Menace
|
13 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 19 | 26 | 31 | 2.38 | |
| 14 |
San Juan SC
|
15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 18 | 25 | 31 | 2.07 | |
| 15 |
Ventura County Fusion
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 11 | 22 | 31 | 2.07 | |
| 16 |
Fort Lauderdale United
|
15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 31 | 2.07 | |
| 17 |
Sueno
|
14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 37 | 22 | 15 | 30 | 2.14 | |
| 18 |
Snohomish United
|
16 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 28 | 18 | 10 | 30 | 1.88 | |
| 19 |
Little Rock Rangers
|
13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 29 | 2.23 | |
| 20 |
Long Island Rough Riders
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 29 | 2.07 | |
| 21 |
Almaden
|
15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 13 | 15 | 29 | 1.93 | |
| 22 |
Minneapolis City SC
|
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 33 | 19 | 14 | 29 | 1.93 | |
| 23 |
Louisiana Krewe
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 2.07 | |
| 24 |
Virginia Beach United
|
14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 29 | 2.07 | |
| 25 |
Hudson Valley Hammers
|
15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 15 | 9 | 29 | 1.93 | |
| 26 |
North Carolina Fusion U23
|
13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 28 | 2.15 | |
| 27 |
|
13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 16 | 13 | 27 | 2.08 | |
| 28 |
FC Tucson
|
14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 12 | 44 | 26 | 1.86 | |
| 29 |
Pinellas County
|
12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 13 | 22 | 26 | 2.17 | |
| 30 |
Peoria City
|
13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 31 | 13 | 18 | 26 | 2.00 | |
| 31 |
West Chester United II
|
13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 30 | 17 | 13 | 26 | 2.00 | |
| 32 |
RKC
|
12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 36 | 16 | 20 | 25 | 2.08 | |
| 33 |
Utah United
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 11 | 17 | 25 | 1.92 | |
| 34 |
Midwest United
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 29 | 13 | 16 | 25 | 1.92 | |
| 35 |
SF Glens
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 16 | 11 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 36 |
Ocean City Nor'easters
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 29 | 18 | 11 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 37 |
Black Rock FC
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 14 | 10 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 38 |
Lane United
|
14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 25 | 1.79 | |
| 39 |
Discoveries
|
13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 26 | 20 | 6 | 25 | 1.92 | |
| 40 |
Capo II
|
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 31 | 14 | 17 | 24 | 2.00 | |
| 41 |
Lexington II
|
12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 8 | 24 | 2.00 | |
| 42 |
Sporting JAX
|
13 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 23 | 1.77 | |
| 43 |
FC Buffalo
|
12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 23 | 1.92 | |
| 44 |
City SC
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 32 | 12 | 20 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 45 |
North Carolina II
|
12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 24 | 13 | 11 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 46 |
Colorado Storm
|
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 20 | 9 | 22 | 1.69 | |
| 47 |
Albion Colorado
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 48 |
|
13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 29 | 21 | 8 | 22 | 1.69 | |
| 49 |
SC United Bantams
|
12 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 1.83 | |
| 50 |
AC Connecticut
|
14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 22 | 1.57 | |
| 51 |
Redlands
|
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 19 | 21 | 21 | 1.75 | |
| 52 |
Rochester
|
12 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 24 | 16 | 8 | 21 | 1.75 | |
| 53 |
Corpus Christi
|
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 21 | 1.75 | |
| 54 |
New England SC
|
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 26 | 21 | 5 | 21 | 1.50 | |
| 55 |
Ann Arbor
|
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 18 | 3 | 21 | 1.75 | |
| 56 |
Bangers
|
14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | 1 | 21 | 1.50 | |
| 57 |
Tennessee
|
12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 21 | 1.75 | |
| 58 |
Project 51O
|
14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 21 | 1.50 | |
| 59 |
AHFC Royals
|
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 17 | 10 | 20 | 1.67 | |
| 60 |
Akron City
|
12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 20 | 1.67 | |
| 61 |
Charlottesville Blues
|
14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 27 | 19 | 8 | 20 | 1.43 | |
| 62 |
Oakland County
|
12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 17 | 5 | 20 | 1.67 | |
| 63 |
Hattiesburg
|
11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 20 | 1.82 | |
| 64 |
San Francisco City
|
14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 19 | 1.36 | |
| 65 |
Denton Diablos
|
11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 19 | 1.73 | |
| 66 |
AMSG
|
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 18 | 13 | 18 | 1.50 | |
| 67 |
The Villages
|
11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 1.64 | |
| 68 |
Nona
|
10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 18 | 1.80 | |
| 69 |
Houston FC
|
12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 14 | 3 | 18 | 1.50 | |
| 70 |
Lonestar
|
11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 1.64 | |
| 71 |
Columbus United
|
11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 11 | 5 | 17 | 1.55 | |
| 72 |
West Virginia Chaos
|
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 21 | 18 | 3 | 17 | 1.42 | |
| 73 |
Flatirons Rush
|
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 17 | 1.42 | |
| 74 |
Northern Indiana
|
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 | |
| 75 |
Brazos Valley
|
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 19 | 23 | -4 | 17 | 1.42 | |
| 76 |
Seacoast United Phantoms
|
14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 25 | -4 | 17 | 1.21 | |
| 77 |
Morris Elite
|
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 20 | -5 | 17 | 1.42 | |
| 78 |
Birmingham Legion II
|
12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 17 | 1.42 | |
| 79 |
Midlakes United
|
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 27 | -7 | 17 | 1.21 | |
| 80 |
Academica
|
14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 17 | 1.21 | |
| 81 |
Miami FC
|
12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 24 | 22 | 2 | 16 | 1.33 | |
| 82 |
Cedar Stars Rush
|
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 16 | 1.33 | |
| 83 |
Kings Hammer Columbus
|
12 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 17 | 22 | -5 | 16 | 1.33 | |
| 84 |
West Seattle Junction
|
14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 16 | 1.14 | |
| 85 |
Toledo Villa
|
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 15 | 1.25 | |
| 86 |
Oly Town
|
14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 29 | -1 | 15 | 1.07 | |
| 87 |
River Light
|
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 15 | 1.25 | |
| 88 |
Reading United
|
12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 22 | -4 | 15 | 1.25 | |
| 89 |
Bigfoot
|
14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 27 | 33 | -6 | 15 | 1.07 | |
| 90 |
Real Central New Jersey
|
12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 14 | 1.17 | |
| 91 |
Brooke House
|
11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 14 | 1.27 | |
| 92 |
Union Macomb
|
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 | 1.17 | |
| 93 |
Sunflower State
|
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 27 | -5 | 14 | 1.17 | |
| 94 |
Kings Hammer Sun City
|
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 14 | 1.17 | |
| 95 |
FC Boston Bolts
|
14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 14 | 1.00 | |
| 96 |
Kalamazoo FC
|
12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 14 | 1.17 | |
| 97 |
Marin
|
14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 20 | 35 | -15 | 14 | 1.00 | |
| 98 |
Santafé Wanderers
|
12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 22 | 33 | -11 | 13 | 1.08 | |
| 99 |
Inter Gainesville
|
11 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 11 | 18 | -7 | 12 | 1.09 | |
| 100 |
Springfield
|
12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 16 | 39 | -23 | 12 | 1.00 |
Sabe Más Sobre el Partido Union Macomb vs Oakland County
Dónde y cuándo será el Partido entre Union Macomb x Oakland County?
El partido entre el Union Macomb y el Oakland County se llevará a cabo en casa del Union Macomb, el 08 Junio 2025, a las 19:30. El partido es para la N/A jornada de USA USL League Two, dónde el Union Macomb está en 20º y Oakland County en 69º. N/A Stadium es donde se llevará a cabo el partido.
¿Cuál es el desempeño del Union Macomb?
Union Macomb es 20º en USA USL League Two. Ha jugado 6 partidos, 3 victorias, 1 empate y 2 derrotas. Union Macomb promedia 1.67 Puntos Por Partido en USA USL League Two, con 7 goles Anotados y 7 goles Concedidos.
Jugando en Casa, Union Macomb se encuentra actualmente en 45º, ha jugado 2 partidos, 1 ganado, 1 empate y 0 derrotas. Union Macomb promedia 2 Puntos Por Partido en USA USL League Two en casa, con 3 goles Anotados y 2 goles Concedidos.
¿Cuál es el desempeño del Oakland County?
Oakland County es 69º en USA USL League Two. Ha jugado 5 partidos, 2 victorias, 0 empates y 3 derrotas. Oakland County promedia 1.2 Puntos Por Partido en USA USL League Two, con 9 goles Anotados y 10 goles Concedidos.
Jugando como visitante, Oakland County se encuentra actualmente en 73º, ha jugado 3 partidos, 1 ganado, 0 empates y 2 derrotas. Oakland County promedia 1 Puntos Por Partido en USA USL League Two fuera de casa, con 4 goles Anotados y 7 goles Concedidos.
¿Cuál es la forma actual del Union Macomb?
En los últimos 5 partidos, Union Macomb ha ganado 2, empatado 1 y perdido 2. Promedia 1.4 puntos por Partido en los últimos 5 partidos, en comparación con el 1.67 que promedia en la competición.
En casa, en los últimos 5 partidos, Union Macomb ha ganado 1, Empatado 1 y perdido 0. Promedia 2 Por Partido en los últimos 5 partidos, en comparación con el 2 que promedia en la competición.
¿Cuál es la forma actual del Oakland County?
En los últimos 5 partidos, Oakland County ha ganado 2, empatado 0 y perdido 3. Promedia 1.2 puntos por Partido en los últimos 5 partidos, en comparación con el 1.2 que promedia en la competición.
Como visitante, en los últimos 5 partidos, Oakland County ha ganado 1, Empatado 0 y perdido 2. Promedia 1 Puntos Por Partido en los últimos 5 partidos, en comparación con el 1 que promedia en la competición
¿Cuál es el Frente a Frente entre Union Macomb y Oakland County?
En los últimos 5 años, Union Macomb y Oakland County han jugado 3 veces. Union Macomb ha ganado 0, mientras que el Oakland County ha ganado 2. 1 partido finalizaron en empate.
En los últimos 5 años, cuando el partido se juega en N/A Stadium, ha habido 0 victorias por el Union Macomb, 0 victorias para el Oakland County y 0 partidos partidos que han finalizado en empate.