País
Equipos
Temporada
Partidos
Vietnam
15
2025/2026
83/186
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
12 | 83% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 25% | 10.66 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.63 |
| 3 |
Ha Noi
|
12 | 75% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9.08 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
12 | 67% | 50% | 42% | 25% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8.75 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
12 | 58% | 50% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8.59 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
12 | 58% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8.59 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
12 | 58% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 8.08 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
12 | 58% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
12 | 67% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Viettel
|
11 | 73% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 7.82 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 7.54 |
| 13 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.41 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
12 | 42% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.17 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
11 | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.64 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 10.43 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 10.2 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 67% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 9.67 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 9 |
| 6 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 8.28 |
| 7 |
Viettel
|
4 | 100% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.83 |
| 11 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.57 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7.29 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
5 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.8 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.5 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 11 |
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9.6 |
| 3 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 9 |
| 4 |
Da Nang
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 9 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.57 |
| 7 |
Ha Noi
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.29 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 8 |
| 9 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.84 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 60% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.6 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 7.57 |
| 13 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.34 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
12 | 92% | 92% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 33% | 8% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
12 | 92% | 67% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 5.33 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
11 | 100% | 73% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 5.27 |
| 5 |
Viettel
|
11 | 100% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 5.27 |
| 6 |
Hà Nội II
|
12 | 83% | 58% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 4.17 |
| 8 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 4.09 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
12 | 67% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.92 |
| 11 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
12 | 75% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
12 | 42% | 42% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.17 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
12 | 58% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.75 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 7 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
4 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 7 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.57 |
| 8 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.2 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
7 | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4 |
| 12 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 86% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 15 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 67% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Nam Dinh
|
5 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 4 |
Ha Noi
|
7 | 86% | 86% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 0% | 5.29 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 100% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 5.2 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 75% | 75% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 7 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 100% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 12 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.4 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.17 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
12 | 83% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 5.42 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
12 | 92% | 83% | 42% | 33% | 25% | 17% | 17% | 5.33 |
| 5 |
Da Nang
|
12 | 75% | 67% | 58% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 17% | 5.33 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
12 | 92% | 67% | 50% | 42% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 7 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
12 | 83% | 67% | 58% | 17% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.5 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
12 | 75% | 75% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8% | 4.42 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
11 | 82% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 9% | 0% | 4.36 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
12 | 75% | 58% | 42% | 33% | 17% | 8% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
12 | 75% | 75% | 42% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.08 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
11 | 82% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 3.55 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.45 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
12 | 50% | 33% | 25% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.08 |
| 15 |
Hà Nội II
|
12 | 67% | 42% | 25% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 16 |
Viettel
|
11 | 45% | 27% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.55 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 5.29 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 5 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 17% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 83% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 7 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Phu Dong
|
5 | 80% | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| 10 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
4 | 75% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
5 | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.8 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.33 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Da Nang
|
7 | 86% | 86% | 86% | 71% | 71% | 43% | 29% | 7 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.8 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
5 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 5.2 |
| 6 |
Binh Duong
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 71% | 57% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 5.14 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 4.86 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
5 | 100% | 100% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.6 |
| 9 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.17 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh
|
5 | 100% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
4 | 100% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.14 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Para quienes disfrutan analizar datos en profundidad, conocer las estadísticas de córners en de la Liga de Vietnam marca una gran diferencia, especialmente para apostadores, analistas y aficionados al fútbol que buscan una lectura más completa de la competición.
Precisamente por eso, APWin se destaca como una fuente confiable. Aquí encontrarás datos actualizados y precisos, como:
Media de córners por partido
Equipos que más y menos generan córners
Clubes que más córners conceden a sus rivales
Estadísticas avanzadas de córners en la Liga de Vietnam 2025/26
Los partidos de de la Liga de Vietnam 2025/26 presentan una media de 8.29 córners por encuentro.
En esta página puedes consultar todas las medias de córners del campeonato, con datos detallados por equipo y según el contexto del partido.
Hasta el momento, el equipo con la mayor media de córners por partido es:
Hai Phong, con un promedio de 10.66 córners por encuentro, considerando tanto los córners a favor como los concedidos.
Por el contrario, el equipo con la menor media de córners en Liga de Vietnam 2025/26 es:
Quang Nam, cuyos partidos registran una media de 8 córners por juego disputado.
Además de las medias generales, APWin ofrece datos específicos que permiten entender mejor el comportamiento de los equipos en relación con los córners a lo largo del campeonato:
• Equipo con más córners a favor:
Ha Noi – media de 6 córners por partido.
• Equipo con menos córners a favor:
Quang Nam – media de 2 córners por encuentro.
• Equipo que más córners concede a sus rivales:
Hoang Anh Gia Lai – promedio de 5.42 córners concedidos por partido.
• Equipo que menos córners concede:
Quang Nam – media de 6 córners permitidos por encuentro.
En esta página también puedes:
Filtrar las estadísticas de córners de los equipos de de la Liga de Vietnam según partidos como local o visitante.
Analizar el comportamiento de los equipos en distintos contextos de juego.
Seguir las principales tendencias de córners del día, ideales para quienes buscan oportunidades en los mercados de córners.
Además de la información disponible aquí, en APWin también encontrarás pronósticos en los principales mercados de córners, como apuestas over córners y under córners en fútbol, siempre basados en datos y análisis.
A continuación, respondemos algunas de las dudas más comunes sobre los córners en esta competición:
Según las estadísticas actuales, Hai Phong es el equipo con más córners por partido, con una media de 10.66. En segundo lugar se encuentra Ha Noi, con 9.08 córners por encuentro, seguido por Nam Dinh, que promedia 9.63.
Actualmente, la media de córners del campeonato es de 8.29 córners por partido.
Cambiar para
¿Quieres cambiar a ?
Entra o registrate para añadir a los favoritos
Puedes entrar con redes sociales
¿Aún no estás registrado? Crea Una Cuenta.