Pronósticos en WhatsApp

Hebei CFFC Logotipo del equipo

Estadísticas de Hebei CFFC

Información del equipo

Temporada

País

Estadio

2022

China

Langfang City Sports Center

Competición

China

Super Liga China

Resumen Resultados del Partido Equipo Mejores Jugadores Clasificación

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Dalian Yifang	33	76%	58%	58%	39%	27%	15%	6%	9.55
2	Wuhan Three Towns	33	70%	58%	58%	33%	21%	18%	12%	9.52
3	Changchun Yatai	33	76%	64%	52%	36%	24%	15%	12%	9.3
4	Hangzhou	33	61%	48%	39%	24%	18%	15%	12%	9.15
5	Shandong Luneng	33	70%	48%	36%	24%	15%	12%	6%	9.07
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	33	67%	48%	36%	24%	21%	12%	6%	9
7	Shanghai SIPG	33	67%	55%	39%	24%	18%	18%	18%	9
8	Chengdu Better City FC	33	67%	55%	42%	33%	21%	12%	3%	9
9	Beijing Guoan	33	64%	48%	39%	24%	18%	18%	12%	8.97
10	Guangzhou R&F	33	61%	48%	39%	30%	24%	21%	15%	8.94
11	Henan Jianye	33	61%	48%	42%	24%	15%	15%	12%	8.87
12	Wuhan Zall	33	67%	55%	33%	24%	21%	15%	9%	8.73
13	Shenzhen	33	67%	45%	36%	24%	15%	12%	3%	8.69
14	Meizhou Hakka	33	55%	52%	42%	27%	12%	9%	6%	8.57
15	Shanghai Shenhua	33	55%	48%	33%	24%	12%	9%	3%	8.37
16	Hebei CFFC	33	67%	39%	24%	15%	12%	9%	3%	8.31
17	Tianjin Teda	33	55%	36%	27%	15%	15%	9%	6%	7.84
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	33	45%	36%	30%	18%	9%	6%	6%	7.73

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Dalian Yifang	17	76%	53%	53%	35%	18%	12%	6%	9.35
2	Wuhan Three Towns	16	75%	69%	69%	31%	25%	25%	13%	9.76
3	Changchun Yatai	17	76%	53%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	8.65
4	Hangzhou	16	75%	63%	50%	31%	31%	25%	25%	10.93
5	Shandong Luneng	16	69%	50%	31%	19%	13%	13%	0%	8.6
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	76%	59%	41%	29%	24%	18%	12%	9.7
7	Shanghai SIPG	16	69%	44%	38%	13%	6%	6%	6%	7.69
8	Chengdu Better City FC	16	69%	63%	44%	38%	25%	13%	0%	9.19
9	Beijing Guoan	17	65%	53%	41%	29%	24%	24%	18%	9.63
10	Guangzhou R&F	16	56%	50%	50%	38%	38%	31%	31%	9.38
11	Henan Jianye	17	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	6%	6%	8.69
12	Wuhan Zall	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	29%	18%	12%	8.53
13	Shenzhen	17	71%	41%	29%	24%	12%	12%	0%	8.48
14	Meizhou Hakka	16	50%	44%	38%	25%	6%	6%	6%	8.44
15	Shanghai Shenhua	16	63%	56%	44%	31%	25%	19%	6%	9.06
16	Hebei CFFC	16	63%	44%	25%	25%	19%	13%	6%	8.47
17	Tianjin Teda	17	53%	35%	24%	6%	6%	0%	0%	7.18
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	29%	24%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.18

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Dalian Yifang	16	75%	63%	63%	44%	38%	19%	6%	9.75
2	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	9.3
3	Changchun Yatai	16	75%	75%	69%	56%	44%	31%	25%	10
4	Hangzhou	17	47%	35%	29%	18%	6%	6%	0%	7.59
5	Shandong Luneng	17	71%	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	9.47
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	56%	38%	31%	19%	19%	6%	0%	8.25
7	Shanghai SIPG	17	65%	65%	41%	35%	29%	29%	29%	10.31
8	Chengdu Better City FC	17	65%	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	6%	8.82
9	Beijing Guoan	16	63%	44%	38%	19%	13%	13%	6%	8.31
10	Guangzhou R&F	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	12%	12%	0%	8.5
11	Henan Jianye	16	69%	56%	44%	25%	25%	25%	19%	9.07
12	Wuhan Zall	16	75%	56%	31%	13%	13%	13%	6%	8.94
13	Shenzhen	16	63%	50%	44%	25%	19%	13%	6%	8.94
14	Meizhou Hakka	17	59%	59%	47%	29%	18%	12%	6%	8.69
15	Shanghai Shenhua	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.71
16	Hebei CFFC	17	71%	35%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	8.18
17	Tianjin Teda	16	56%	38%	31%	25%	25%	19%	13%	8.6
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	63%	50%	38%	19%	6%	6%	6%	8.31

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	31	65%	39%	29%	19%	13%	3%	0%	3.39
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	31	65%	26%	6%	6%	3%	3%	3%	2.97
3	Shanghai SIPG	31	84%	74%	55%	42%	35%	29%	13%	5.5
4	Henan Jianye	31	81%	74%	58%	29%	23%	16%	13%	4.84
5	Hangzhou	31	84%	65%	55%	35%	19%	13%	6%	4.56
6	Beijing Guoan	31	87%	74%	58%	45%	42%	26%	10%	5.44
7	Hebei CFFC	31	29%	23%	3%	3%	0%	0%	0%	2.09
8	Changchun Yatai	31	74%	68%	52%	35%	26%	16%	13%	4.36
9	Shandong Luneng	31	97%	87%	77%	48%	35%	29%	23%	6.38
10	Guangzhou R&F	31	42%	32%	26%	19%	10%	3%	3%	2.91
11	Shanghai Shenhua	31	71%	58%	45%	29%	10%	3%	0%	3.79
12	Tianjin Teda	31	71%	55%	39%	26%	13%	10%	3%	4
13	Dalian Yifang	31	103%	81%	71%	48%	32%	26%	16%	5.58
14	Shenzhen	31	68%	55%	42%	26%	10%	6%	3%	3.91
15	Wuhan Zall	31	84%	52%	35%	16%	3%	3%	0%	3.7
16	Meizhou Hakka	31	81%	65%	52%	35%	16%	13%	6%	4.63
17	Wuhan Three Towns	31	90%	77%	52%	35%	32%	29%	23%	5.64
18	Chengdu Better City FC	31	87%	81%	71%	52%	39%	32%	16%	5.64

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	59%	35%	29%	12%	6%	0%	0%	3.29
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	59%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
3	Shanghai SIPG	16	69%	63%	44%	31%	31%	25%	6%	4.5
4	Henan Jianye	17	76%	71%	53%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.81
5	Hangzhou	16	81%	56%	56%	44%	31%	25%	13%	5.2
6	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	65%	53%	47%	47%	29%	18%	6.13
7	Hebei CFFC	16	25%	19%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.2
8	Changchun Yatai	17	88%	82%	53%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.71
9	Shandong Luneng	16	88%	75%	69%	44%	31%	25%	19%	5.93
10	Guangzhou R&F	16	44%	38%	38%	31%	13%	6%	6%	3.38
11	Shanghai Shenhua	16	75%	69%	63%	38%	13%	6%	0%	4.56
12	Tianjin Teda	17	59%	47%	35%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.59
13	Dalian Yifang	17	100%	76%	71%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.59
14	Shenzhen	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3.24
15	Wuhan Zall	17	71%	41%	35%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3.35
16	Meizhou Hakka	16	81%	69%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	4.5
17	Wuhan Three Towns	16	88%	81%	56%	44%	38%	31%	25%	6.13
18	Chengdu Better City FC	16	81%	81%	63%	50%	38%	31%	19%	5.81

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	63%	38%	25%	25%	19%	6%	0%	3.5
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	63%	19%	13%	13%	6%	6%	6%	3.25
3	Shanghai SIPG	17	88%	76%	59%	47%	35%	29%	18%	6.5
4	Henan Jianye	16	75%	69%	56%	31%	25%	19%	19%	4.88
5	Hangzhou	17	76%	65%	47%	24%	6%	0%	0%	4
6	Beijing Guoan	16	81%	75%	56%	38%	31%	19%	0%	4.75
7	Hebei CFFC	17	29%	24%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2
8	Changchun Yatai	16	50%	44%	44%	38%	31%	25%	19%	4
9	Shandong Luneng	17	94%	88%	76%	47%	35%	29%	24%	6.76
10	Guangzhou R&F	17	35%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	2.44
11	Shanghai Shenhua	17	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.06
12	Tianjin Teda	16	75%	56%	38%	25%	19%	19%	6%	4.47
13	Dalian Yifang	16	94%	75%	63%	50%	31%	25%	19%	5.56
14	Shenzhen	16	69%	56%	50%	38%	19%	13%	6%	4.67
15	Wuhan Zall	16	88%	56%	31%	19%	6%	6%	0%	4.06
16	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
17	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	65%	41%	24%	24%	24%	18%	5.18
18	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	71%	71%	47%	35%	29%	12%	5.47

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	31	97%	87%	71%	42%	29%	23%	19%	5.61
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	31	81%	71%	52%	35%	26%	19%	13%	4.76
3	Shanghai SIPG	31	61%	45%	29%	26%	10%	10%	6%	3.5
4	Henan Jianye	31	71%	52%	39%	23%	13%	13%	10%	4.03
5	Hangzhou	31	68%	58%	42%	23%	19%	16%	10%	4.59
6	Beijing Guoan	31	65%	45%	29%	19%	16%	13%	3%	3.53
7	Hebei CFFC	31	90%	87%	81%	68%	52%	23%	10%	6.22
8	Changchun Yatai	31	84%	58%	48%	39%	26%	23%	16%	4.94
9	Shandong Luneng	31	58%	29%	13%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.69
10	Guangzhou R&F	31	84%	77%	68%	52%	39%	29%	19%	6.03
11	Shanghai Shenhua	31	84%	71%	48%	32%	19%	16%	10%	4.58
12	Tianjin Teda	31	87%	48%	26%	19%	16%	6%	0%	3.84
13	Dalian Yifang	31	71%	61%	48%	32%	10%	6%	3%	3.97
14	Shenzhen	31	90%	77%	52%	29%	19%	13%	6%	4.78
15	Wuhan Zall	31	84%	71%	55%	45%	29%	23%	13%	5.03
16	Meizhou Hakka	31	68%	48%	39%	19%	13%	13%	6%	3.94
17	Wuhan Three Towns	31	61%	52%	45%	26%	13%	13%	6%	3.88
18	Chengdu Better City FC	31	58%	45%	42%	16%	13%	3%	0%	3.36

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	94%	88%	71%	53%	41%	29%	29%	6.41
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	76%	59%	29%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.47
3	Shanghai SIPG	16	56%	38%	25%	19%	6%	6%	6%	3.19
4	Henan Jianye	17	59%	29%	29%	24%	18%	18%	12%	3.88
5	Hangzhou	16	69%	63%	56%	31%	25%	19%	19%	5.73
6	Beijing Guoan	17	59%	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	0%	3.5
7	Hebei CFFC	16	81%	81%	69%	56%	44%	19%	13%	6.27
8	Changchun Yatai	17	71%	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
9	Shandong Luneng	16	56%	31%	13%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.67
10	Guangzhou R&F	16	75%	69%	63%	44%	38%	31%	19%	6
11	Shanghai Shenhua	16	69%	56%	44%	38%	25%	19%	13%	4.5
12	Tianjin Teda	17	82%	35%	24%	18%	12%	12%	0%	3.59
13	Dalian Yifang	17	65%	59%	47%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.76
14	Shenzhen	17	100%	76%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	5.24
15	Wuhan Zall	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	29%	29%	18%	5.18
16	Meizhou Hakka	16	75%	50%	38%	13%	6%	6%	6%	3.94
17	Wuhan Three Towns	16	50%	50%	44%	25%	6%	6%	0%	3.63
18	Chengdu Better City FC	16	56%	50%	44%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.38

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	88%	75%	63%	25%	13%	13%	6%	4.75
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	75%	75%	69%	38%	31%	19%	13%	5.06
3	Shanghai SIPG	17	59%	47%	29%	29%	12%	12%	6%	3.81
4	Henan Jianye	16	75%	69%	44%	19%	6%	6%	6%	4.19
5	Hangzhou	17	59%	47%	24%	12%	12%	12%	0%	3.59
6	Beijing Guoan	16	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	13%	6%	3.56
7	Hebei CFFC	17	88%	82%	82%	71%	53%	24%	6%	6.18
8	Changchun Yatai	16	88%	63%	63%	50%	31%	31%	25%	6
9	Shandong Luneng	17	53%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
10	Guangzhou R&F	17	82%	76%	65%	53%	35%	24%	18%	6.06
11	Shanghai Shenhua	17	88%	76%	47%	24%	12%	12%	6%	4.65
12	Tianjin Teda	16	81%	56%	25%	19%	19%	0%	0%	4.13
13	Dalian Yifang	16	69%	56%	44%	31%	13%	6%	6%	4.19
14	Shenzhen	16	69%	69%	44%	19%	6%	6%	6%	4.27
15	Wuhan Zall	16	81%	69%	50%	44%	25%	13%	6%	4.88
16	Meizhou Hakka	17	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	18%	6%	3.94
17	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	41%	24%	18%	18%	12%	4.12
18	Chengdu Better City FC	17	53%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	0%	3.35