Pronósticos en WhatsApp

Chongqing Dangdai Lifan Logotipo del equipo

Estadísticas de Chongqing Dangdai Lifan

Información del equipo

Temporada

País

Recinto

2021

China

Chongqing Olympic Sports Center

Competición

China

Super Liga China

Resumen Resultados del Partido Equipo Mejores Jugadores Clasificación

Tabla Córners Tarjetas 1ª Mitad 2ª Mitad Más / Menos Goles Portería a Cero Ambos Marcan Anota / Sufre Primero

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shenzhen	22	82%	73%	59%	45%	36%	27%	14%	10.81
2	Shanghai SIPG	22	86%	68%	59%	50%	32%	18%	9%	10.43
3	Qingdao Huanghai	22	64%	59%	55%	45%	36%	27%	14%	9.91
4	Beijing Guoan	22	73%	59%	50%	50%	27%	18%	9%	9.9
5	Hebei CFFC	22	64%	59%	59%	41%	36%	27%	18%	9.81
6	Guangzhou R&F	22	68%	59%	55%	45%	14%	14%	9%	9.52
7	Shandong Luneng	22	77%	68%	50%	36%	27%	9%	0%	9.33
8	Dalian Yifang	22	64%	55%	41%	32%	18%	14%	9%	9.19
9	Changchun Yatai	22	64%	59%	50%	41%	18%	5%	5%	9.14
10	Shanghai Shenhua	22	55%	50%	45%	36%	27%	14%	0%	9
11	Wuhan Zall	22	68%	59%	41%	27%	18%	9%	5%	8.9
12	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	22	64%	50%	27%	23%	9%	9%	9%	8.68
13	Tianjin Teda	22	68%	55%	36%	18%	5%	5%	5%	8.66
14	Henan Jianye	22	50%	36%	27%	23%	18%	5%	5%	8.4
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	22	55%	41%	36%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8.34
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	22	45%	41%	27%	14%	5%	0%	0%	7.5

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shenzhen	11	82%	73%	55%	45%	27%	27%	9%	11.1
2	Shanghai SIPG	11	73%	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	9%	10.2
3	Qingdao Huanghai	11	64%	55%	55%	45%	45%	36%	18%	10
4	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	73%	73%	73%	36%	27%	9%	10.45
5	Hebei CFFC	11	82%	82%	82%	55%	45%	36%	27%	11
6	Guangzhou R&F	11	45%	36%	36%	27%	9%	9%	9%	8.2
7	Shandong Luneng	11	73%	64%	45%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8.73
8	Dalian Yifang	11	64%	55%	36%	36%	18%	9%	9%	9.28
9	Changchun Yatai	11	64%	55%	55%	45%	18%	9%	9%	9.4
10	Shanghai Shenhua	11	55%	55%	55%	36%	27%	0%	0%	9.34
11	Wuhan Zall	11	73%	55%	27%	27%	18%	9%	0%	8.64
12	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	55%	36%	27%	18%	9%	9%	9%	8.09
13	Tianjin Teda	11	73%	45%	27%	9%	0%	0%	0%	8
14	Henan Jianye	11	64%	45%	27%	27%	18%	0%	0%	8.7
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	55%	45%	36%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8.63
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	55%	55%	27%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.91

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Más de 9.5	Más de 10.5	Más de 11.5	Más de 12.5	Más de 13.5	Promedio
1	Shenzhen	11	82%	73%	64%	45%	45%	27%	18%	10.55
2	Shanghai SIPG	11	100%	73%	64%	55%	36%	18%	9%	10.64
3	Qingdao Huanghai	11	64%	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	9%	9.82
4	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	45%	27%	27%	18%	9%	9%	9.3
5	Hebei CFFC	11	45%	36%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	8.5
6	Guangzhou R&F	11	91%	82%	73%	64%	18%	18%	9%	10.73
7	Shandong Luneng	11	82%	73%	55%	36%	27%	9%	0%	10
8	Dalian Yifang	11	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	18%	9%	9.1
9	Changchun Yatai	11	64%	64%	45%	36%	18%	0%	0%	8.91
10	Shanghai Shenhua	11	55%	45%	36%	36%	27%	27%	0%	8.73
11	Wuhan Zall	11	64%	64%	55%	27%	18%	9%	9%	9.18
12	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	73%	64%	27%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9.28
13	Tianjin Teda	11	64%	64%	45%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9.4
14	Henan Jianye	11	36%	27%	27%	18%	18%	9%	9%	8.1
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	55%	36%	36%	36%	27%	9%	0%	8
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	36%	27%	27%	27%	9%	0%	0%	7.09

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	22	73%	68%	55%	32%	23%	23%	9%	4.86
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	22	59%	41%	27%	14%	9%	9%	0%	3.32
3	Shanghai SIPG	22	95%	82%	73%	59%	45%	36%	36%	6.95
4	Henan Jianye	22	64%	55%	18%	9%	5%	5%	0%	3.45
5	Beijing Guoan	22	82%	68%	55%	41%	18%	18%	18%	5.14
6	Hebei CFFC	22	73%	64%	45%	32%	9%	0%	0%	4.1
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	22	59%	45%	27%	18%	5%	5%	5%	3.32
8	Changchun Yatai	22	55%	50%	45%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.76
9	Shandong Luneng	22	77%	68%	68%	59%	45%	23%	9%	5.71
10	Guangzhou R&F	22	50%	27%	14%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.57
11	Shanghai Shenhua	22	86%	82%	64%	50%	36%	27%	9%	5.9
12	Tianjin Teda	22	59%	50%	45%	23%	14%	9%	5%	4.14
13	Dalian Yifang	22	82%	68%	59%	45%	36%	23%	14%	5.38
14	Shenzhen	22	91%	77%	77%	59%	41%	41%	27%	7.19
15	Wuhan Zall	22	77%	36%	27%	23%	23%	9%	5%	3.95
16	Qingdao Huanghai	22	50%	36%	32%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.23

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	82%	73%	55%	27%	27%	27%	18%	5.27
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	73%	55%	36%	9%	0%	0%	0%	3.55
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	91%	73%	64%	45%	36%	36%	36%	6.8
4	Henan Jianye	11	82%	82%	18%	18%	9%	9%	0%	4.4
5	Beijing Guoan	11	91%	82%	55%	45%	18%	18%	18%	5.27
6	Hebei CFFC	11	82%	82%	55%	36%	9%	0%	0%	4.36
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	55%	45%	18%	9%	0%	0%	0%	3
8	Changchun Yatai	11	45%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.3
9	Shandong Luneng	11	73%	64%	64%	55%	45%	18%	0%	5.18
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	45%	9%	9%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.2
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	73%	73%	45%	45%	36%	27%	0%	5.67
12	Tianjin Teda	11	64%	45%	36%	27%	18%	9%	0%	3.91
13	Dalian Yifang	11	82%	73%	64%	45%	45%	27%	27%	5.64
14	Shenzhen	11	91%	73%	73%	64%	55%	55%	27%	7.9
15	Wuhan Zall	11	91%	55%	36%	27%	27%	18%	9%	4.64
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	64%	45%	45%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.91

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	64%	64%	55%	36%	18%	18%	0%	4.4
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	45%	27%	18%	18%	18%	18%	0%	3.09
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	100%	91%	82%	73%	55%	36%	36%	7.09
4	Henan Jianye	11	45%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.5
5	Beijing Guoan	11	73%	55%	55%	36%	18%	18%	18%	5
6	Hebei CFFC	11	64%	45%	36%	27%	9%	0%	0%	3.8
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	64%	45%	36%	27%	9%	9%	9%	3.64
8	Changchun Yatai	11	64%	64%	64%	27%	18%	9%	0%	4.18
9	Shandong Luneng	11	82%	73%	73%	64%	45%	27%	18%	6.3
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	55%	45%	18%	9%	9%	9%	9%	3.91
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	100%	91%	82%	55%	36%	27%	18%	6.09
12	Tianjin Teda	11	55%	55%	55%	18%	9%	9%	9%	4.4
13	Dalian Yifang	11	82%	64%	55%	45%	27%	18%	0%	5.1
14	Shenzhen	11	91%	82%	82%	55%	27%	27%	27%	6.55
15	Wuhan Zall	11	64%	18%	18%	18%	18%	0%	0%	3.27
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	36%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.55

General
Casa
Visitante

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	22	50%	32%	27%	18%	18%	14%	9%	3.48
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	22	82%	64%	41%	18%	9%	5%	5%	4.18
3	Shanghai SIPG	22	59%	32%	32%	23%	5%	5%	5%	3.48
4	Henan Jianye	22	64%	50%	45%	32%	27%	18%	9%	4.95
5	Beijing Guoan	22	77%	55%	55%	36%	27%	23%	9%	4.76
6	Hebei CFFC	22	91%	77%	55%	50%	32%	23%	18%	5.71
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	22	82%	64%	55%	41%	32%	23%	14%	5.36
8	Changchun Yatai	22	73%	68%	50%	32%	27%	27%	18%	5.38
9	Shandong Luneng	22	68%	45%	27%	14%	5%	5%	0%	3.62
10	Guangzhou R&F	22	82%	73%	68%	64%	36%	23%	23%	5.95
11	Shanghai Shenhua	22	36%	32%	23%	14%	9%	9%	5%	3.1
12	Tianjin Teda	22	77%	64%	50%	36%	23%	5%	5%	4.52
13	Dalian Yifang	22	55%	45%	41%	18%	9%	5%	5%	3.81
14	Shenzhen	22	64%	55%	27%	18%	5%	5%	0%	3.62
15	Wuhan Zall	22	77%	77%	59%	41%	32%	27%	9%	4.95
16	Qingdao Huanghai	22	95%	86%	77%	50%	45%	36%	18%	6.68

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	55%	27%	27%	18%	18%	18%	9%	3.36
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	91%	73%	55%	27%	9%	0%	0%	4.36
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	55%	27%	27%	27%	0%	0%	0%	3.4
4	Henan Jianye	11	64%	45%	45%	27%	18%	18%	0%	4.3
5	Beijing Guoan	11	91%	64%	64%	36%	27%	27%	18%	5.18
6	Hebei CFFC	11	100%	100%	73%	73%	45%	27%	27%	6.64
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	82%	64%	55%	27%	27%	18%	9%	5.09
8	Changchun Yatai	11	73%	73%	55%	27%	27%	27%	27%	6.1
9	Shandong Luneng	11	55%	45%	36%	18%	0%	0%	0%	3.55
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	64%	55%	55%	45%	27%	18%	18%	5
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	36%	27%	27%	27%	18%	18%	9%	3.67
12	Tianjin Teda	11	73%	45%	45%	36%	27%	0%	0%	4.09
13	Dalian Yifang	11	55%	45%	45%	27%	9%	0%	0%	3.64
14	Shenzhen	11	36%	36%	27%	18%	9%	9%	0%	3.2
15	Wuhan Zall	11	64%	64%	55%	27%	18%	18%	9%	4
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	91%	82%	73%	45%	36%	27%	18%	6.09

#	Equipo	JJ	Más de 2.5	Más de 3.5	Más de 4.5	Más de 5.5	Más de 6.5	Más de 7.5	Más de 8.5	Promedio
1	Guangzhou Evergrande	11	45%	36%	27%	18%	18%	9%	9%	3.6
2	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	11	73%	55%	27%	9%	9%	9%	9%	4
3	Shanghai SIPG	11	64%	36%	36%	18%	9%	9%	9%	3.55
4	Henan Jianye	11	64%	55%	45%	36%	36%	18%	18%	5.6
5	Beijing Guoan	11	64%	45%	45%	36%	27%	18%	0%	4.3
6	Hebei CFFC	11	82%	55%	36%	27%	18%	18%	9%	4.7
7	Chongqing Dangdai Lifan	11	82%	64%	55%	55%	36%	27%	18%	5.64
8	Changchun Yatai	11	73%	64%	45%	36%	27%	27%	9%	4.73
9	Shandong Luneng	11	82%	45%	18%	9%	9%	9%	0%	3.7
10	Guangzhou R&F	11	100%	91%	82%	82%	45%	27%	27%	6.82
11	Shanghai Shenhua	11	36%	36%	18%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.64
12	Tianjin Teda	11	82%	82%	55%	36%	18%	9%	9%	5
13	Dalian Yifang	11	55%	45%	36%	9%	9%	9%	9%	4
14	Shenzhen	11	91%	73%	27%	18%	0%	0%	0%	4
15	Wuhan Zall	11	91%	91%	64%	55%	45%	36%	9%	5.91
16	Qingdao Huanghai	11	100%	91%	82%	55%	55%	45%	18%	7.27