Temporada
País
2018
Vietnam
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ha Noi
|
26 | 85% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 35% | 27% | 15% | 10.76 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
26 | 77% | 54% | 54% | 42% | 35% | 31% | 19% | 10.4 |
| 3 |
Quang Nam
|
26 | 65% | 54% | 38% | 35% | 31% | 27% | 19% | 10.26 |
| 4 |
Sai Gon
|
26 | 85% | 77% | 54% | 46% | 35% | 23% | 4% | 10.11 |
| 5 |
Da Nang
|
26 | 85% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 27% | 23% | 15% | 10.04 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
26 | 77% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 9.8 |
| 7 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
26 | 88% | 73% | 50% | 35% | 19% | 12% | 8% | 9.76 |
| 8 |
Nam Dinh
|
26 | 85% | 65% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 12% | 8% | 9.72 |
| 9 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
26 | 69% | 42% | 35% | 23% | 15% | 12% | 8% | 8.92 |
| 10 |
Can Tho
|
26 | 69% | 58% | 42% | 27% | 15% | 12% | 4% | 8.77 |
| 11 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
26 | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 12% | 8.5 |
| 12 |
Binh Duong
|
26 | 62% | 42% | 27% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 4% | 8.46 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
26 | 50% | 35% | 35% | 27% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 8.39 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
26 | 50% | 46% | 27% | 19% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 8.15 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 46% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 11.08 |
| 2 |
Sai Gon
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 69% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 10.92 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 10.66 |
| 4 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 69% | 62% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 10.46 |
| 5 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 10 |
| 6 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 100% | 85% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 9.85 |
| 7 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 9.53 |
| 8 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 54% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 9.25 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 9 |
| 10 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
13 | 77% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 8.77 |
| 11 |
Can Tho
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 8.39 |
| 12 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 8.16 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 46% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.91 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 11.09 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 46% | 46% | 38% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 10.16 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 92% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 10.16 |
| 4 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 85% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 10.08 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 92% | 62% | 46% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 10.07 |
| 6 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 9.66 |
| 7 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 9.36 |
| 8 |
Sai Gon
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 9.31 |
| 9 |
Can Tho
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 9.16 |
| 10 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 9.08 |
| 11 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 62% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8.84 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 46% | 38% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 8.83 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 46% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8.3 |
| 14 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 7.92 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
26 | 92% | 88% | 85% | 73% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 7.88 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
26 | 85% | 65% | 54% | 42% | 35% | 31% | 15% | 5.6 |
| 4 |
Quang Nam
|
26 | 69% | 62% | 50% | 42% | 31% | 27% | 15% | 5.35 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
26 | 88% | 69% | 54% | 46% | 27% | 15% | 8% | 5.15 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
26 | 81% | 73% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 8% | 4% | 4.8 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
26 | 85% | 77% | 58% | 31% | 23% | 12% | 4% | 4.73 |
| 8 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
26 | 85% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 27% | 19% | 8% | 4.69 |
| 9 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
26 | 81% | 54% | 38% | 27% | 19% | 15% | 8% | 4.44 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
26 | 69% | 62% | 35% | 23% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 4.38 |
| 11 |
Sai Gon
|
26 | 88% | 62% | 46% | 23% | 12% | 12% | 4% | 4.38 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
26 | 77% | 65% | 42% | 23% | 12% | 8% | 4% | 4.23 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
26 | 69% | 50% | 23% | 19% | 19% | 12% | 4% | 4 |
| 14 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
26 | 77% | 42% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.65 |
| 15 |
Can Tho
|
26 | 46% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 2.85 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 85% | 85% | 77% | 46% | 8.54 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 5.92 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 85% | 85% | 69% | 54% | 54% | 8% | 0% | 5.83 |
| 5 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 46% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 5.5 |
| 6 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 69% | 46% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 5.46 |
| 7 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 5.38 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 5.08 |
| 9 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 5.08 |
| 10 |
Sai Gon
|
13 | 92% | 69% | 54% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 4.92 |
| 11 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 4.85 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 4.82 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 4.54 |
| 14 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 15 |
Can Tho
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.62 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 7.17 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 46% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 15% | 5.31 |
| 4 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 5.18 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 92% | 69% | 46% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 4.92 |
| 6 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 4.54 |
| 7 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 77% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 4.33 |
| 8 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 46% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Sai Gon
|
13 | 85% | 54% | 38% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 10 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 38% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.85 |
| 11 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 54% | 54% | 31% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 12 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 85% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.46 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| 14 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.25 |
| 15 |
Can Tho
|
13 | 38% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.08 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Can Tho
|
26 | 96% | 73% | 54% | 42% | 42% | 31% | 15% | 5.92 |
| 3 |
Sai Gon
|
26 | 92% | 81% | 62% | 42% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 5.73 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
26 | 85% | 73% | 54% | 50% | 31% | 27% | 19% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
26 | 92% | 77% | 69% | 42% | 23% | 15% | 4% | 5.32 |
| 6 |
Da Nang
|
26 | 92% | 77% | 54% | 50% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 5.31 |
| 7 |
Quang Nam
|
26 | 81% | 65% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 12% | 8% | 4.91 |
| 8 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
26 | 77% | 50% | 42% | 38% | 35% | 27% | 15% | 4.85 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
26 | 77% | 69% | 38% | 23% | 19% | 12% | 8% | 4.65 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
26 | 62% | 38% | 31% | 27% | 27% | 19% | 4% | 4.39 |
| 11 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
26 | 69% | 62% | 42% | 27% | 23% | 12% | 4% | 4.23 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
26 | 73% | 58% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 8% | 0% | 4.12 |
| 13 |
Binh Duong
|
26 | 69% | 58% | 42% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 4.08 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
26 | 73% | 50% | 42% | 19% | 12% | 8% | 8% | 3.92 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
26 | 54% | 31% | 27% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 0% | 2.88 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Sai Gon
|
13 | 92% | 92% | 69% | 46% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 6 |
| 3 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 92% | 77% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 5.58 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 100% | 85% | 69% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 5.31 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 4.83 |
| 6 |
Can Tho
|
13 | 100% | 54% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 4.77 |
| 7 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 46% | 38% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.54 |
| 8 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 69% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 4.31 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 4.15 |
| 10 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.92 |
| 11 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.92 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 54% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.09 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 54% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.92 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 46% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1.92 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Can Tho
|
13 | 92% | 92% | 69% | 62% | 62% | 46% | 23% | 7.08 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 62% | 62% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 6.31 |
| 4 |
Da Nang
|
13 | 100% | 85% | 62% | 62% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 6.08 |
| 5 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 5.58 |
| 6 |
Sai Gon
|
13 | 92% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 5.46 |
| 7 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 54% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 5.38 |
| 8 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 69% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 5.33 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 5.15 |
| 10 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 92% | 69% | 62% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 4.92 |
| 11 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 0% | 4.85 |
| 12 |
Than Quang Ninh
|
13 | 62% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 4.54 |
| 13 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 14 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 46% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.92 |
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de Can Tho en el V.League 1:
Los partidos de Can Tho registran un promedio total de 8.77 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 42.31% de los partidos de Can Tho en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
Can Tho promedia 2.85 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 7.69% de los encuentros, Can Tho logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 5.92 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de Can Tho como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.
Cambiar para
¿Quieres cambiar a ?
Entra o registrate para añadir a los favoritos
Puedes entrar con redes sociales
¿Aún no estás registrado? Crea Una Cuenta.