Sanna Khanh Hoa: Estadísticas de Córners en 2023/24
Información del equipo
Temporada
País
2023/24
Vietnam
Competición
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
26 | 77% | 65% | 62% | 46% | 35% | 23% | 12% | 9.85 |
| 2 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
26 | 73% | 65% | 46% | 35% | 31% | 19% | 15% | 9.77 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong
|
26 | 65% | 62% | 50% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 9.65 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
26 | 62% | 54% | 46% | 35% | 31% | 23% | 19% | 9.5 |
| 5 |
Binh Dinh
|
26 | 73% | 54% | 50% | 35% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 9.5 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
26 | 69% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 12% | 9.42 |
| 7 |
Hà Nội II
|
26 | 69% | 65% | 50% | 23% | 23% | 19% | 8% | 9.04 |
| 8 |
Quang Nam
|
26 | 73% | 54% | 42% | 31% | 31% | 12% | 4% | 9.04 |
| 9 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
26 | 62% | 46% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 8.62 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh
|
26 | 58% | 42% | 35% | 23% | 23% | 19% | 12% | 8.61 |
| 11 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
26 | 62% | 42% | 31% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 12% | 8.58 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
26 | 58% | 42% | 31% | 19% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8.5 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
26 | 69% | 50% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 8.27 |
| 14 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
26 | 62% | 42% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 8% | 4% | 7.96 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Viettel
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 62% | 46% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 11.31 |
| 2 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 10.38 |
| 3 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 77% | 77% | 62% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 9.85 |
| 4 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 9.31 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 9.08 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 54% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 9 |
| 7 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8.93 |
| 8 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 8.84 |
| 9 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 8.61 |
| 10 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 46% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 8.46 |
| 11 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8.38 |
| 12 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 69% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 8.31 |
| 13 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8.3 |
| 14 |
Binh Dinh
|
13 | 54% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 7.54 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Binh Dinh
|
13 | 92% | 69% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 54% | 31% | 11.47 |
| 2 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 77% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 10.77 |
| 3 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 69% | 46% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 10.23 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 62% | 62% | 54% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 10.23 |
| 5 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 9.85 |
| 6 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 9.76 |
| 7 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8.85 |
| 8 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8.77 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8.69 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 0% | 8.23 |
| 11 |
Viettel
|
13 | 38% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 7.69 |
| 12 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.69 |
| 13 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 54% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 7.31 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 46% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.77 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Viettel
|
26 | 88% | 77% | 65% | 38% | 35% | 19% | 19% | 5.81 |
| 3 |
Ha Noi
|
26 | 92% | 88% | 65% | 46% | 27% | 23% | 15% | 5.73 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
26 | 77% | 69% | 62% | 46% | 27% | 23% | 12% | 5.35 |
| 5 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
26 | 77% | 73% | 62% | 50% | 35% | 15% | 8% | 5.15 |
| 6 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
26 | 77% | 62% | 35% | 23% | 19% | 15% | 12% | 4.85 |
| 7 |
Nam Dinh
|
26 | 73% | 65% | 46% | 35% | 27% | 15% | 12% | 4.69 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
26 | 73% | 62% | 54% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 4.5 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
26 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 12% | 4.46 |
| 10 |
Binh Dinh
|
26 | 81% | 54% | 46% | 19% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 4.15 |
| 11 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
26 | 62% | 54% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 19% | 12% | 4 |
| 12 |
Quang Nam
|
26 | 65% | 46% | 35% | 19% | 19% | 12% | 4% | 3.96 |
| 13 |
Binh Duong
|
26 | 69% | 42% | 38% | 19% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 3.69 |
| 14 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
26 | 46% | 42% | 38% | 23% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 3.5 |
| 15 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
26 | 58% | 38% | 19% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.31 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Viettel
|
13 | 100% | 100% | 85% | 54% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 7.23 |
| 3 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 6.69 |
| 4 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 92% | 92% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 6.15 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 5.62 |
| 6 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 77% | 77% | 69% | 54% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 5.54 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 85% | 85% | 62% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 5.46 |
| 8 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 77% | 77% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 5.38 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 77% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 4.38 |
| 10 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 69% | 69% | 46% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 4.38 |
| 11 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 77% | 54% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.92 |
| 12 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 13 |
Binh Dinh
|
13 | 77% | 38% | 38% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.69 |
| 14 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 38% | 15% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 3.54 |
| 15 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 38% | 31% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 3.38 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 92% | 85% | 69% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 5.31 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 62% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 5.08 |
| 4 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 8% | 0% | 4.85 |
| 5 |
Binh Dinh
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 4.62 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 4.54 |
| 7 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 23% | 8% | 4.38 |
| 8 |
Viettel
|
13 | 77% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 4.38 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 54% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 3.62 |
| 11 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 54% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 3.62 |
| 12 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 69% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 0% | 3.54 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.46 |
| 14 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3 |
| 15 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 38% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 2.69 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Binh Duong
|
26 | 81% | 65% | 54% | 50% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 5.96 |
| 3 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
26 | 92% | 81% | 65% | 50% | 42% | 27% | 12% | 5.92 |
| 4 |
Binh Dinh
|
26 | 77% | 73% | 54% | 46% | 35% | 27% | 19% | 5.35 |
| 5 |
Quang Nam
|
26 | 81% | 69% | 62% | 38% | 27% | 19% | 8% | 5.08 |
| 6 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
26 | 77% | 69% | 62% | 38% | 19% | 12% | 4% | 4.65 |
| 7 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
26 | 65% | 46% | 42% | 31% | 15% | 12% | 12% | 4.62 |
| 8 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
26 | 73% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 27% | 19% | 12% | 4.62 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
26 | 77% | 62% | 42% | 35% | 27% | 12% | 12% | 4.54 |
| 10 |
Hai Phong
|
26 | 65% | 62% | 58% | 35% | 23% | 15% | 12% | 4.5 |
| 11 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
26 | 77% | 62% | 42% | 23% | 8% | 4% | 0% | 4.04 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
26 | 69% | 50% | 31% | 19% | 12% | 8% | 8% | 3.92 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
26 | 69% | 50% | 46% | 12% | 4% | 4% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 14 |
Viettel
|
26 | 58% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 3.69 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
26 | 46% | 38% | 15% | 4% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 2.54 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 5.62 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 5.23 |
| 4 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 54% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 4.77 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 15% | 0% | 4.69 |
| 6 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 4.31 |
| 7 |
Viettel
|
13 | 62% | 46% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 4.08 |
| 8 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 77% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4 |
| 9 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 3.92 |
| 10 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 11 |
Binh Dinh
|
13 | 62% | 54% | 38% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 0% | 3.85 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 69% | 46% | 46% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.69 |
| 13 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 46% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 3.31 |
| 14 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 62% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.08 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 54% | 46% | 15% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Binh Dinh
|
13 | 92% | 92% | 69% | 62% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 6.85 |
| 3 |
Binh Duong
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 54% | 54% | 46% | 38% | 31% | 6.69 |
| 4 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
13 | 100% | 92% | 77% | 54% | 46% | 23% | 15% | 6.23 |
| 5 |
Hai Phong
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 77% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 5.69 |
| 6 |
Quang Nam
|
13 | 85% | 77% | 69% | 46% | 31% | 31% | 8% | 5.38 |
| 7 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 77% | 69% | 54% | 38% | 38% | 23% | 23% | 5.38 |
| 8 |
Sanna Khanh Hoa
|
13 | 54% | 54% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 5.23 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
13 | 77% | 62% | 38% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 4.77 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
13 | 85% | 62% | 46% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 8% | 4.77 |
| 11 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
13 | 77% | 77% | 69% | 31% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 4.62 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
13 | 85% | 69% | 38% | 23% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.15 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
13 | 69% | 54% | 46% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 3.77 |
| 14 |
Viettel
|
13 | 54% | 31% | 15% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 3.31 |
| 15 |
Ha Noi
|
13 | 38% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 2.38 |
Estadísticas de Córners de Sanna Khanh Hoa
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de Sanna Khanh Hoa en el V.League 1:
Los partidos de Sanna Khanh Hoa registran un promedio total de 8.62 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 42.31% de los partidos de Sanna Khanh Hoa en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
Sanna Khanh Hoa promedia 4 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 23.08% de los encuentros, Sanna Khanh Hoa logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 4.62 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de Sanna Khanh Hoa como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.