Phu Dong: Estadísticas de Córners en 2025/26
Información del equipo
Temporada
País
2025/26
Vietnam
Competición
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
15 | 87% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 10.67 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 9.78 |
| 3 |
Nam Dinh
|
14 | 57% | 50% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 9.35 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
15 | 67% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9.06 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
14 | 64% | 50% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 8.71 |
| 6 |
Viettel
|
14 | 71% | 29% | 21% | 21% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 8.64 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
15 | 60% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
15 | 73% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 8.27 |
| 9 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 7.94 |
| 11 |
Da Nang
|
14 | 57% | 50% | 36% | 29% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 7.93 |
| 12 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 54% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 8% | 8% | 8% | 7.84 |
| 13 |
Hà Nội II
|
15 | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.6 |
| 14 |
PVF-CAND
|
14 | 50% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.5 |
| 15 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
15 | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.13 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 10.75 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 10.33 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
7 | 86% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 9.72 |
| 4 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 9.63 |
| 5 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 9.38 |
| 6 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 57% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.57 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 8.34 |
| 8 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 8.28 |
| 9 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 8.13 |
| 10 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7.76 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 63% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.63 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.14 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
7 | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.71 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 33% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.34 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Más de 9.5 | Más de 10.5 | Más de 11.5 | Más de 12.5 | Más de 13.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 10.57 |
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 9.38 |
| 3 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 9.13 |
| 4 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 9.01 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 9 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 7 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 8.71 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 8.63 |
| 9 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.38 |
| 10 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
5 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 7.71 |
| 12 |
Viettel
|
7 | 57% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 7.57 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 7.13 |
| 14 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6.71 |
| 15 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
14 | 93% | 86% | 57% | 43% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 6.07 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
15 | 93% | 73% | 47% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 5.47 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
14 | 100% | 79% | 57% | 43% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 5.43 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
14 | 100% | 64% | 50% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 14% | 5.14 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 62% | 46% | 31% | 23% | 15% | 15% | 4.69 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.4 |
| 8 |
Hà Nội II
|
15 | 87% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.27 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
14 | 79% | 57% | 50% | 21% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4.07 |
| 10 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
14 | 57% | 36% | 14% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.57 |
| 12 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
15 | 73% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.47 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
15 | 60% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.4 |
| 14 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
15 | 40% | 40% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
14 | 64% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 100% | 83% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 6.33 |
| 3 |
Viettel
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 71% | 43% | 43% | 14% | 0% | 5.43 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.25 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 4.88 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 4.86 |
| 8 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 83% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 4.67 |
| 9 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.57 |
| 10 |
Hà Nội II
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 11 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 63% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 12 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.75 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
7 | 71% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 83% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 15 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 75% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 5.88 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 5.71 |
| 4 |
Viettel
|
7 | 100% | 86% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 67% | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 5.17 |
| 6 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
5 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 7 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 100% | 63% | 50% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 8 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.63 |
| 10 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 29% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 11 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.57 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 3.13 |
| 13 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.57 |
| 14 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.38 |
| 15 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 5.93 |
| 4 |
Hai Phong
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 5.2 |
| 5 |
Da Nang
|
14 | 71% | 64% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 21% | 14% | 5 |
| 6 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
15 | 87% | 73% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 4.8 |
| 7 |
Binh Duong
|
14 | 86% | 64% | 50% | 43% | 21% | 7% | 0% | 4.64 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 4.27 |
| 9 |
Nam Dinh
|
14 | 86% | 43% | 36% | 29% | 29% | 7% | 0% | 4.21 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
15 | 73% | 67% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 4.2 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
14 | 79% | 64% | 36% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.93 |
| 12 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
15 | 87% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 13 |
Ha Noi
|
14 | 57% | 43% | 36% | 21% | 14% | 7% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 14 |
Hà Nội II
|
15 | 67% | 47% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 3.33 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
14 | 57% | 36% | 21% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.21 |
| 16 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
13 | 69% | 38% | 23% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.15 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Quang Nam
|
1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 6 |
| 3 |
Hai Phong
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 5.25 |
| 5 |
Nam Dinh
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 6 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
8 | 88% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.38 |
| 7 |
Viettel
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.29 |
| 8 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
8 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.25 |
| 9 |
Ha Noi
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 4 |
| 10 |
Phu Dong
|
7 | 71% | 71% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 11 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 57% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.71 |
| 12 |
Binh Duong
|
6 | 67% | 50% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 13 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
7 | 86% | 57% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.43 |
| 14 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
8 | 50% | 50% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.88 |
| 15 |
Da Nang
|
6 | 50% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| 16 |
Hà Nội II
|
7 | 57% | 43% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.57 |
| # | Equipo | JJ | Más de 2.5 | Más de 3.5 | Más de 4.5 | Más de 5.5 | Más de 6.5 | Más de 7.5 | Más de 8.5 | Promedio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Da Nang
|
8 | 88% | 88% | 88% | 63% | 63% | 38% | 25% | 6.75 |
| 3 |
Hoang Anh Gia Lai
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 43% | 43% | 29% | 6.71 |
| 4 |
Song Lam Nghe An
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 5.43 |
| 5 |
Binh Duong
|
8 | 100% | 75% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 5.38 |
| 6 |
Hai Phong
|
7 | 86% | 71% | 29% | 29% | 14% | 14% | 14% | 4.86 |
| 7 |
Phu Dong
|
8 | 75% | 63% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 4.63 |
| 8 |
Ho Chi Minh City
|
7 | 71% | 57% | 57% | 43% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 9 |
PVF-CAND
|
7 | 100% | 71% | 29% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4.14 |
| 10 |
FLC Thanh Hoa
|
8 | 88% | 50% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 |
Hà Nội II
|
8 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4 |
| 12 |
Nam Dinh
|
6 | 100% | 33% | 17% | 17% | 17% | 0% | 0% | 3.83 |
| 13 |
Công An Nhân Dân
|
5 | 100% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 14 |
Ha Noi
|
8 | 50% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 15 |
Viettel
|
7 | 29% | 14% | 14% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.14 |
| 16 |
Quang Nam
|
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0 |
Estadísticas de Córners de Phu Dong
Las estadísticas de córners son un recurso clave para analizar partidos de fútbol con mayor profundidad. Este tipo de datos permite entender no solo qué tan agresivo es el ataque de un equipo, sino también cuánto sufre defensivamente, en función de los córners que concede a sus rivales.
Un equipo que genera muchos córners suele atacar con frecuencia, utilizar las bandas y mantener presión ofensiva constante. Por el contrario, conceder muchos córners puede indicar debilidades defensivas, repliegues prolongados o dificultades para contener ataques por los costados.
A continuación, te mostramos los principales números y promedios de córners de Phu Dong en el V.League 1:
Los partidos de Phu Dong registran un promedio total de 8.6 córners por encuentro (sumando córners a favor y en contra).
El 40% de los partidos de Phu Dong en este campeonato finalizaron con más de 9.5 córners.
Phu Dong promedia 4.4 córners a favor por partido en la presente temporada.
En el 26.67% de los encuentros, Phu Dong logró 5 o más córners a favor.
En cuanto al apartado defensivo, el equipo concede un promedio de 4.2 córners por partido.
Además, puedes consultar el desglose de córners de Phu Dong como local y visitante, junto con los porcentajes de over y under tanto en córners a favor como en córners concedidos. Esto aporta una visión más completa del comportamiento del equipo según el contexto del partido.
En APWin también tienes acceso a estadísticas de córners actualizadas a diario, lo que te permite identificar qué partidos, en distintas ligas del mundo, presentan mayor probabilidad de tener muchos córners y detectar oportunidades interesantes en este mercado.